Communicating climate (change) uncertainties: Simulation games as boundary objects

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 45, Issue , 2015, Pages 41-52

  van Pelt, S C ^a   Haasnoot, Marjolijn ^c   Arts, Bas ^b   Ludwig, Fulco ^b   Swart, Rob ^b   Biesbroek, Robbert ^b  

^a Weather Impact   (Netherlands)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c DELTARES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Climate; Climate adaptation; Climate change; Climate change uncertainty; Communicating uncertainty; Simulation game; Water management; Water manager

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAME; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; SIMULATION; UNCERTAINTY; WORKSHOP;

EID: 84949116545     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alley R.B., Marotzke J., Nordhaus W.D., Overpeck J.T., Peteet D.M., Pielke R.A., Pierrehumbert R.T., Rhines P.B., Stocker T.F., Talley L.D. Abrupt climate change. Science 2003, 299(5615):2005-2010.
2. Arnell N.W., Benito G., Cogley J.G., Doll P., Jiang T., Mwakalila S.S. Climate change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Chapter 3. Freshwater Resources 2014, Press CU. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA.
3. Arnold G., Bos H., Doef R., Goud R., Kielen N., Luijn Fv. Water Management in the Netherlands. wd0111vv007b 2011, Centre for Water management (Rijkswaterstaat), Den Haag, the Netherlands.
4. Biesbroek G.R., Klostermann J.E.M., Termeer C.J.A.M., Kabat P. On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Reg. Environ. Change 2013, 13(5):1119-1129. 10. 1007/s10113-013-0421-y.
5. Bowker G.C., Star S.L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences 2000, The MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
6. Burch S., Sheppard S.R., Shaw A., Flanders D. Planning for climate change in a flood-prone community: municipal barriers to policy action and the use of visualizations as decision-support tools. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2010, 3(2):126-139.
7. Carolan M.S. Ontological politics: mapping a complex environmental problem. Environ. Values 2004, 13(4):497-522.
8. Clark W.C., Tomich T.P., Van Noordwijk M., Guston D., Dickson N.M., Catacutan D., McNie E. Boundary work for sustainable development: natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) 2011, Paper presented at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
9. Deltares (2014). (accessed 27.06.14). http://www.deltares.nl/en/product/1518666/sustainable-delta-game.
10. Demeritt D. The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2001, 91(2):307-337.
11. Deser C., Knutti R., Solomon S., Phillips A.S. Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate. Nat. Clim. Change 2012, 2(11):775-779.
12. Dessai S., Hulme M., Lempert R., Pielke R. Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation?. Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. N. Adger (Ed.).
13. Dessai S., Van der Sluis J. Uncertainty and Climate Change Adaptation - Scoping Study. Report NWS-E-2007-198 2007, 95. Department of Science Technology and Society, Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
14. Diefenderfer H.L., Thom R.M., Hofseth K. A framework for risk analysis for ecological restoration projects in the US Army Corps of Engineers. Economics and Ecological Risk Assessment: Applications to Watershed Management 2005, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA. R.J.F. Bruins, M.T. Heberling (Eds.).
15. Dupuis J., Biesbroek R. Comparing apples and oranges: the dependent variable problem in comparing and evaluating climate change adaptation policies. Global Environ. Change 2013, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.022.
16. Eisenack K. A climate change board game for interdisciplinary communication and education. Simul. Gaming 2012, 10.1177/1046878112452639.
17. Fischhoff B. Nonpersuasive communication about matters of greatest urgency: climate change. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41(21):7204-7208. 10. 1021/es0726411.
18. Gieryn T.F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983, 48(6):781-795. 10. 2307/2095325.
19. Haasnoot M., Middelkoop H., Offermans A., Beek E., Deursen W.A.V. Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment. Clim. Change 2012, 115(3-4):795-819. 10. 1007/s10584-012-0444-2.
20. Hall J. Probabilistic climate scenarios may misrepresent uncertainty and lead to bad adaptation decisions. Hydrol. Process. 2007, 21(8).
21. Haug C., Huitema D., Wenzler I. Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2011, 78(6):968-981. 10. 1016/j.techfore.2010.12.001.
22. Hawkins E., Sutton R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2009, 90(8):1095-1107. 10. 1175/2009bams2607.1.
23. Hawkins E., Sutton R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim. Dyn. 2011, 37(1):407-418. 10. 1007/s00382-010-0810-6.
24. Hoppe R. Policy analysis, science, and politics: from speaking truth to power to making sense together. Sci. Public Policy 1999, 26(3):201-210.
25. Hoppe R. Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis Prax. 2005, 3(3):199-215. 10. 1007/s10202-005-0074-0.
26. Hoppe R., Wesselink A., Cairns R. Lost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change. WIREs Clim. Change 2013, 4(4):283-300. 10. 1002/wcc.225.
27. Huitema D., Turnhout E. Working at the science-policy interface: a discursive analysis of boundary work at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Environ. Polit. 2009, 18. 10. 1080/09644010903007427.
28. IPCC Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom/New York, NY, USA. C.B. Field, V. Barros, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach (Eds.).
29. Jasanoff S. The Fifth Branch: Scientists as Policy-Makers 1990, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Jones R.N. Managing uncertainty in climate change projections - issues for impact assessment. Clim. Change 2000, 45(3-4):403-419. 10. 1023/a:1005551626280.
31. Juhola S., Driscoll P., Mendler de Suarez J., Suarez P. Social strategy games in communicating trade-offs between mitigation and adaptation in cities. Urban Clim. 2013, 4(0):102-116. 10. 1016/j.uclim.2013.04.003.
32. Kabat P., Fresco L.O., Stive M.J.F., Veerman C.P., van Alphen J.S.L.J., Parmet B.W.A.H., Hazeleger W., Katsman C. Dutch coasts in transition. Nat. Geosci. 2009, 2(7):450-452.
33. Koppenjan J., Klijn E. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: Public Private Controversies 2004, Routledge, Oxon.
34. Kriz W.C. Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simul. Gaming 2003, 34(4):495-511.
35. Kunreuther H., Heal G., Allen M., Edenhofer O., Field C.B., Yohe G. Risk management and climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2013, 3(5):447-450.
36. Lemos M.C., Rood R.B. Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice. WIREs Clim. Change 2010, 1(5):670-682.
37. Levina N., Vaast E. The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Q. 2005, 19(2):335-363.
38. Lonsdale K., Downing T., Nicholls R., Parker D., Vafeidis A., Dawson R., Hall J. Plausible responses to the threat of rapid sea-level rise in the Thames Estuary. Clim. Change 2008, 91(1):145-169.
39. Lynch A.H., Tryhorn L., Abramson R. Working at the boundary: facilitating interdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2008, 89(2):169-179. 10. 1175/bams-89-2-169.
40. Maslin M., Austin P. Uncertainty: climate models at their limit. Nature 2012, 486(7402):183-184.
41. Milfont T.L. Global warming, climate change and human psychology. Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in theory, research and practice 2010, 19-42.
42. Mozumder P., Flugman E., Randhir T. Adaptation behavior in the face of global climate change: survey responses from experts and decision makers serving the Florida Keys. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2011, 54(1):37-44. 10. 1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.008.
43. Patt A. Communicating Uncertainty to Policy Makers. Uncertainties in Environmental Modelling and Consequences for Policy Making 2009, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
44. Patt A., Dessai S. Communicating uncertainty: lessons learned and suggestions for climate change assessment. Compt. Rend. Geosci. 2005, 337(4):425-441. 10. 1016/j.crte.2004.10.004.
45. Pidgeon N., Fischhoff B. The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat. Clim. Change 2011, 1(1):35-41.
46. Ren C., Ng E.Y., Katzschner L. Urban climatic map studies: a review. Int. J. Climatol. 2011, 31(15):2213-2233.
47. Risbey J.S., Kandlikar M. Expressions of likelihood and confidence in the IPCC uncertainty assessment process. Clim. Change 2007, 85(1-2):19-31.
48. Shackley S., Deanwood R. Stakeholder perceptions of climate change impacts at the Regional Scale: implications for the effectiveness of regional and local responses. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2002, 45(3):381-402. 10. 1080/09640560220133414.
49. Shackley S., Wynne B. Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary-ordering devices and authority. Sci. Technol. Human Values 1996, 21(3):275-302.
50. Sheppard S.R.J. Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environ. Sci. Policy 2005, 8(6):637-654. 10. 1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002.
51. Shukla J., Hagedorn R., Miller M., Palmer T.N., Hoskins B., Kinter J., Marotzke J., Slingo J. Strategies: revolution in climate prediction is both necessary and possible: a declaration at the world modelling summit for climate prediction. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2009, 90(2):175-178. 10. 1175/2008bams2759.1.
52. Slocum R. Polar bears and energy-efficient lightbulbs: strategies to bring climate change home. Environ. Plan. D 2004, 22:413-438.
53. Star S.L. This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Human Values 2010, 35(5):601-617. 10. 1177/0162243910377624.
54. Star S.L., Griesemer J.R. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Soc. Stud. Sci. 1989, 19(3):387-420. 10. 1177/030631289019003001.
55. Swart R., Bernstein L., Ha-Duong M., Petersen A. Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Clim. Change 2009, 92(1-2):1-29. 10. 1007/s10584-008-9444-7.
56. Tang S., Dessai S. Usable science? The U.K. climate projections 2009 and decision support for adaptation planning. Weather Clim. Soc. 2012, 4(4):300-313. 10. 1175/wcas-d-12-00028.1.
57. Tribbia J., Moser S.C. More than information: what coastal managers need to plan for climate change. Environ. Sci. Policy 2008, 11(4):315-328. 10. 1016/j.envsci.2008.01.003.
58. Turnhout E. The effectiveness of boundary objects: the case of ecological indicators. Sci. Public Policy 2009, 36(5):403-412.
59. Valkering P., van der Brugge R., Offermans A., Haasnoot M., Vreugdenhil H. A perspective-based simulation game to explore future pathways of a water-society system under climate change. Simul. Gaming 2012, 10.1177/1046878112441693.
60. Van der Brugge R., Rotmans J., Loorbach D. The transition in Dutch water management. Reg. Environ. Change 2005, 5(4):164-176. 10. 1007/s10113-004-0086-7.
61. Van Pelt S.C., Beersma J.J., Buishand A.T., Van den Hurk B.J.J.M., Schellekens J. Uncertainty in the future change of extreme precipitation over the Rhine basin: the role of internal climate variability. Clim. Dyn. 2014, 0930-7575, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2312-4.
62. Vervoort J.M., Kok K., van Lammeren R., Veldkamp T. Stepping into futures: exploring the potential of interactive media for participatory scenarios on social-ecological systems. Futures 2010, 42(6):604-616. (Special Issue: futures for multiple civilizations). 10. 1016/j.futures.2010.04.031.
63. Wardekker J.A., van der Sluijs J.P., Janssen P.H.M., Kloprogge P., Petersen A.C. Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface. Environ. Sci. Policy 2008, 11(7):627-641. 10. 1016/j.envsci.2008.05.005.
64. Webster M. Communicating climate change uncertainty to policy-makers and the public. Clim. Change 2003, 61(1-2):1-8. 10. 1023/a:1026351131038.
65. Weingart P., Engels A., Pansegrau P. Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Underst. Sci. 2000, 9(3):261-283.
66. Wesselink A., Buchanan K.S., Georgiadou Y., Turnhout E. Technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics at the science-policy interface (SI: environmental and developmental discourses: technical knowledge, discursive spaces and politics). Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 30(0):1-9. 10. 1016/j.envsci.2012.12.008.
67. White D.D., Wutich A., Larson K.L., Gober P., Lant T., Senneville C. Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater. Sci. Public Policy 2010, 37(3):219-232. 10. 3152/030234210x497726.
68. Wilby R.L., Dessai S. Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 2010, 65(7):180-185. 10. 1002/wea.543.