Uncertainty communication in environmental assessments: views from the Dutch science-policy interface

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 627-641

  Wardekker, J Arjan ^a,b   van der Sluijs, Jeroen P ^a   Janssen, Peter H M ^b   Kloprogge, Penny ^a   Petersen, Arthur C ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Information needs; Pedigree; Probability; Risk communication; Science policy interface; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA;

AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FLOODING; NETHERLANDS; NITROUS OXIDE EMISSION; PARTICULATE MATTER; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 46749090316     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Blanke D.D., and Mitchell W. Towards Health with Justice: Litigation and Public Inquiries as Tools for Tobacco Control (2002), World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva
2. Chu D., Strand R., and Fjelland R. Theories of complexity. Complexity 8 (2003) 19-30
3. Cooney R. The Precautionary Principle in Biodiversity Conservation and Natural Resource Management: An Issues Paper for Policy-makers, Researchers and Practitioners (2004), IUCN, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK
4. De Vries, A.S., 2007. Department of Science, Technology, Health and Policy Studies. University of Twente, Enschede (Personal communication).
5. EEA. Late Lessons From Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000 (2001), European Environment Agency, Copenhagen
6. EEA, 2005. Environment and health. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. Available from: http://reports.eea.europa.eu/eea_report_2005_10/en.
7. Flugstad A.R., and Windschitl P.D. The Influence of Reasons on Interpretations of Probability Forecasts. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16 (2003) 107-126
8. Frewer L., Hunt S., Brennan M., Kuznesof S., Ness M., and Ritson C. The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research 6 1 (2003) 75-85
9. Funtowicz S.O. Why knowledge assessment?. In: Guimarães Pereira A., Guedes Vaz S., and Tognetti S. (Eds). Interfaces between Science and Society (2006), Greenleaf Publishing Ltd., Sheffield 138-145
10. Funtowicz S.O., and Ravetz J.R. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
11. Funtowicz S.O., and Ravetz J.R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 (1993) 739-755
12. Groenenberg H., and Van der Sluijs J.P. Valueloading and uncertainty in a sector-based differentiation scheme for emission allowances. Climatic Change 71 1 (2005) 75-115
13. GroupSystems, 2002. GroupSystems Workgroup Edition & Professional Suite, Version 3.4. See http://www.groupsystems.com/.
14. Guimarães Pereira A., and Corral Quintana S. From technocratic to participatory decision support systems: responding to new governance initiatives. Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis 6 (2002) 95-107
15. In: Guimarães Pereira A., Guedes Vaz S., and Tognetti S. (Eds). Interfaces Between Science and Society (2006), Greenleaf Publishing Ltd., Sheffield
16. Ha-Duong M., Swart R., Bernstein L., and Petersen A.C. Uncertainty management in the IPCC: agreeing to disagree. Global Environmental Change 17 (2007) 8-11
17. Hellström T. The Science-Policy dialogue in transformation: model-uncertainty and environmental policy. Science and Public Policy 23 2 (1996) 91-97
18. Hofstede G. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. (2001), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
19. Holling C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review Of Ecology And Systematics 4 (1973) 1-23
20. Honingh N. Onzekerheden in het Mest- en ammoniakmodel (2004), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht
21. Ibrekk H., and Morgan M.G. Graphical communication of uncertain quantities to nontechnical people. Risk Analysis 7 (1987) 519-529
22. IPCC. Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. IPCC. Guidance Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Addressing Uncertainties (2005), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
24. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis-Summary for Policymakers (2007), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
25. Janssen P.H.M., Petersen A.C., Van der Sluijs J.P., Risbey J.S., and Ravetz J.R. A guidance for assessing and communicating uncertainties. Water Science & Technology 52 (2005) 125-131
26. Kasemir B., Jaeger C.C., Gardner M.T., Clark W.C., and Wokaun A. Public Participation in Sustainability Science-A Handbook (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Kloprogge P., and Van der Sluijs J.P. Verslag Expert Meeting onzekerheidscommunicatie rond fijn stof en gezondheid (2006), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht
28. Kloprogge P., and Van der Sluijs J.P. Verslag Beleidslabsessie 'Onzekerheidsinformatie in de Milieubalans 2005' (2006), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht
29. Kloprogge, P., Van der Sluijs, J.P., Wardekker, J.A., 2007. Uncertainty Communication: Issues and Good Practice. Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht. Available from: http://www.nusap.net/guidance/.
30. Krupnick A., Morgenstern R., Batz M., Nelson P., Burtraw D., Shih J.S., and McWilliams M. Not A Sure Thing: Making Regulatory Choices under Uncertainty (2006), Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington
31. Kuhn K.M. Message format and audience values: interactive effects of uncertainty information and environmental attitudes on perceived risk. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20 (2000) 41-51
32. Manning M., Petit M., Easterling D., Murphy D., Patwardhan A., Rogner H.H., Swart R., and Yohe G. IPCC Workshop on Describing Scientific Uncertainties in Climate Change to Support Analysis of Risk and of Options (2004), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva
33. Michaels D. Doubt is their product. Scientific American 292 6 (2005) 96-101
34. MNP. Milieubalans 2005 (2005), Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP), Bilthoven
35. Morgan M.G. Uncertainty analysis in risk assessment. Human Ecological Risk Assessment 4 1 (1998) 25-39
36. Morgan M.G. Characterizing and dealing with uncertainty: insights from the integrated assessment of climate change. Integrated Assessment 4 1 (2003) 46-55
37. Moss R.H., and Schneider S.H. Uncertainties in the IPCC TAR: recommendations to lead authors for more consistent assessment and reporting. In: Pachauri R., Taniguchi T., and Tanaka K. (Eds). IPCC Supporting Material, Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC (2000), Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva 33-51
38. Neutra R.R., Cohen A., Fletcher T., Michaels D., Richter E.D., and Soskolne C.L. Toward guidelines for the ethical reanalysis and reinterpretation of another's research. Epidemiology 17 3 (2006) 335-338
39. Patt A.G., and Dessai S. Communicating uncertainty: lessons learned and suggestions for climate change assessment. Comptes Rendus Geoscience 337 (2005) 425-441
40. Patt A.G., and Schrag D.P. Using specific language to describe risk and probability. Climatic Change 61 (2003) 17-30
41. Petersen A.C. Simulating Nature-A Philosophical Study of Computer-simulation Uncertainties and Their Role in Climate Science and Policy Advice (2006), Het Spinhuis Publishers, Amsterdam
42. Renooij S., and Witteman C. Talking probabilities: communicating probabilistic information with words and numbers. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 22 (1999) 169-194
43. Risbey. Subjective elements in climate policy advice. Climatic Change 85 1-2 (2007) 11-17
44. Risbey J., Van der Sluijs J., Kloprogge P., Ravetz J., Funtowicz S., and Corral Quintana S. Application of a checklist for quality assistance in environmental modelling to an energy model. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 10 1 (2005) 63-79
45. Slovic P., Fischhoff B., and Lichtenstein S. Perceived risk: psychological factors and social implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 376 (1981) 17-34 1764
46. Swart, R., Bernstein, L. Ha-Duong, M., Petersen, A., 2008. Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Climatic Change, doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9444-7.
47. Thompson Klein J., Grossenbacher-Mansuy W., Häberli R., Bill A., Scholz R.W., and Welti M. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving Among Science, Technology, and Society. An Effective Way for Managing Complexity (2001), Birkhäuser, Basel
48. Turban E., and Aronson J.E. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems. 5th ed. (1998), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
49. UNESCO COMEST. The Precautionary Principle. World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST) (2005), United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Paris
50. Van Asselt M.B.A. Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk: The PRIMA Approach to Decision Support (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
51. Van der Sluijs J.P. A way out of the credibility crisis around model-use in integrated environmental assessment. Futures 34 (2002) 133-146
52. Van der Sluijs J.P. Uncertainty as a monster in the science-policy interface: four coping strategies. Water Science & Technology 52 (2005) 87-92
53. Van der Sluijs J.P. Uncertainty and Precaution in Environmental Management: Insights from the UPEM conference. Environmental Modelling and Software 22 5 (2007) 590-598
54. Van der Sluijs, J.P., Risbey, J.S., Kloprogge, P., Ravetz, J.R., Funtowicz, S.O., Corral Quintana, S., Guimarães Pereira, Â., De Marchi, B., Petersen, A.C., Janssen, P.H.M., Hoppe, R., Huijs, S.W.F., 2003. RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication: Detailed Guidance. Utrecht University and RIVM/MNP, Utrecht/Bilthoven. Available at: http://www.nusap.net/guidance/.
55. Van der Sluijs J.P., Craye M., Funtowicz S.O., Kloprogge P., Ravetz J.R., and Risbey J.S. Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model based environmental assessment: the NUSAP System. Risk Analysis 25 (2005) 481-492
56. Van der Sluijs J.P., Craye M., Funtowicz S., Kloprogge P., Ravetz J., and Risbey J. Experiences with the NUSAP system for multidimensional uncertainty assessment in model based foresight studies. Water Science & Technology 52 6 (2005) 133-144
57. Van der Sluijs J.P., Risbey J.S., and Ravetz J.R. Uncertainty assessment of VOC emissions from Paint in the Netherlands. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 105 (2005) 229-259
58. Van der Sluijs J.P., Petersen A.C., Janssen P.H.M., Risbey J.S., and Ravetz J.R. Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions. Environmental Research Letters 3 (2008) 9 024008
59. Visser, H., Petersen, A.C., in press. The likelihood of holding outdoor skating marathons in the Netherlands as a policy-relevant indicator of climate change. Climatic Change.
60. Wallsten T.J., and Budescu D.V. Quantifying probabilistic expressions: comment. Statistical Science 5 (1990) 23-26
61. Wallsten T.J., Budescu D.V., Rapoport A., Zwick R., and Forsyth B.H. Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 348-365
62. Wardekker, J.A., Van der Sluijs, J.P., 2005. Report of the Expert Meeting Uncertainty Communication, Hotel Mitland, Utrecht, The Netherlands, December 10, 2004. Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
63. Wardekker J.A., and Van der Sluijs J.P. Onzekerheidscommunicatie in de Milieubalans 2005: Resultaten Gebruikerspanel Beleidsmakers (2006), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht
64. Wardekker J.A., and Van der Sluijs J.P. Onzekerheidscommunicatie in de Milieubalans 2005: Resultaten Gebruikerspanel Stakeholders (2006), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht
65. Wardekker J.A., and Van der Sluijs J.P. Evaluatie van Onzekerheidscommunicatie in de Milieubalans 2005. Synthesis Report (2005), Department of Science, Technology and Society, Utrecht University, Utrecht
66. Wardekker J.A., Janssen P.H.M., Besseling P.J., and Mathijssen J. Interactive experiment: perception and communication of risks and uncertainty. In: Mathijssen J., Petersen A., Besseling P., Rahman A., and Don H. (Eds). Dealing with Uncertainty in Policymaking (2008), CPB, PBL, and RAND Europe, The Hague/Bilthoven/Leiden 75-85
67. Weiss C. Expressing scientific uncertainty. Law, Probability and Risk 2 (2003) 25-46
68. Weiss C. Can there be science-based precaution?. Environmental Research Letters 1 1 (2006) 7 014003
69. Witteman C., and Rinnooij S. Evaluation of a verbal-numerical probability scale. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 33 (2003) 117-131