Planning for climate change in a flood-prone community: Municipal barriers to policy action and the use of visualizations as decision-support tools

Journal of Flood Risk Management

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 126-139

  Burch, S ^a   Sheppard, S R J ^b   Shaw, A ^b   Flanders, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Climate change; Decision support; Flood management; Scenarios; Visualizations

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FLOOD CONTROL; POLICY ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION; WATER RESOURCE;

BRITISH COLUMBIA; CANADA;

EID: 77956119791     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1753318X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01062.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O'Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K. Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, 727. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Van Der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, In, eds, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
2. Adger WN, Arnell N, Tompkins E. Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environ Change Part A 2005, 15:77-86.
3. Al-Kodmany K. Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, implementation, and evaluation. Landsc Urban Plann 1999, 45:37-45.
4. Al-Kodmany K. GIS in the urban landscape: reconfiguring neighbourhood planning and design processes. Landsc Res 2000, 25:5-28.
5. Appleton KJ, Lovett AA. Defining 'sufficient' realism in visualisations for rural environmental decision-making. Landsc Urban Plann 2003, 62:117-131.
6. Bai Z. Integrating global concerns into urban management: the scale and readiness arguements. J Ind Ecol 2007, 11:15-29.
7. Banuri T, Barker T, Bashmakov I, Blok K, Christensen J, Davidson O, Grubb M, Halsnaes K, Jepma C, Jochem E, Kauppi P, Krankina O, Krupnick A, Kuijpers L, Kverndokk S, Markandya A, Metz B, Moomaw WR, Moreira JR, Morita T, Pan J, Price L, Richels R, Robinson J, Sathaye J, Swart R, Tanaka K, Taniguchi T, Toth F, Taylor T, Weyant J. Technical summary. Climate change mitigation 2001: a report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2001, Metz B, Davidson O, Swart R, Pan J, In, eds, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
8. Berkhout F. Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment. Global Environ Change 2002, 12:1-4.
9. Betsill M. Mitigating climate change in US cities: opportunities and obstacles. Local Environ 2001, 6:393-406.
10. Böhringer C, Vogt C. The dismantling of a breakthrough: the Kyoto Protocol as symbolic policy. Eur J Polit Econ 2004, 20:597-617.
11. Buchner BK, Carraro C, Cersosimo I, Marchiori C. Back to Kyoto? US Participation and the Linkage Between R&D and Climate Cooperation. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3299, Centre for Economic Policy Research, 2002
12. Bulkeley H, Betsill MM. Cities and climate change: urban sustainability and global environmental governance 2003, London, Routledge
13. Bulkeley H, Betsill M. Rethinking sustainable cities: multi-level governance and the 'urban' politics of climate change. Environ Polit 2005, 14:42-63.
14. Burch S. In pursuit of resilient, low-carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy 2009, doi, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.070
15. Burch S, Robinson J. A framework for explaining the links between capacity and action in response to global climate change. Climate Policy 2007, 7:304-316.
16. Burgess J, Clark J, Chilvers J. Going 'upstream': issues arising with UK experiments in participatory science and technology assessment. Socilogia e Politiche Sociali 2005, 8:107-136.
17. Conroy MM, Gordon SI. Utility of interactive computer-based materials for enhancing public participation. J Environ Plann Manage 2004, 47:19-33.
18. Daniel TC, Meitner MJ. Representational validity of landscape visualization: the effect of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. J Environ Psychol 2001, 21:61-72.
19. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomporphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociological Rev 1983, 48:147-160.
20. Dockerty T, Lovett A, Sünnenberg G, Appleton K, Parry M. Visualizing the potential impacts of climate change on rural landscapes. Comput, Environ Urban Syst 2005, 29:297-320.
21. Dryzek JS. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, and contestations 2000, Oxford, Oxford University Press
22. http://www.fraserbasin.bc.ca/fraser_basin/index.html, Fraser Basin Council, Fraser River Basin, 2004. Available at, (accessed 20 December 2007)
23. Grothmann T, Patt A. Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environ Change 2005, 15:199-213.
24. Haddad B. Ranking the adaptive capacity of nations to climate change when socio-political goals are explicit. Global Environ Change 2005, 15:165-176.
25. Hill P. Biophysical impacts of sea level rise and changing storm conditions on Roberts Bank. Draft Assessment Report, Geological Survey of Canada, 2006
26. Irwin A, Wynne B. Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science 1996, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
27. Johnson C, Penning-Rowsell E, Parker D. Natural and imposed injustices: the challenges in implementing 'fair' flood risk management policy in England. Geographical J 2007, 173:374-390.
28. Jones PJS, Burgess J. Building partnership capacity for the collaborative management of marine protected areas in the U.K. a preliminary analysis. J Environ Manage 2005, 77:227-243.
29. Kaiser FG, Wolfing S. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. J Environ Psychol 1999, 19:1-19.
30. Karp DG. Values and their effect on pro-environmental behaviour. Environ Behav 1996, 28:111-133.
31. Klijn F, van Buuren M, van Rooij SAM. Flood-risk management strategies for an uncertain future: living with Rhine river floods in the Netherlands? Ambio 2004, 33:141-147.
32. Kollmuss A, Agyeman M. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally, and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour. Environ Educ Res 2002, 3:239-260.
33. Ledoux L, Cornell S, O'Riordan T, Harvey R, Banyard L. Towards sustainable flood and coastal management: identifying drivers of, and obstacles to, managed realignment. Land Use Policy 2005, 22:129-144.
34. Lewis JL, Sheppard SRJ. Culture and communication: can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? Landsc Urban Plann 2006, 3:291-313.
35. MacEachren AM. Cartography and GIS: extending collaborative tools to support virtual teams. Progr Hum Geogr 2001, 25:431-444.
36. Mahoney J. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory Soc 2000, 29:507-48.
37. Mendez R. http://www.elpais.com/articulo/espana/Inmobiliarias/acusan/Greenpeace/hundir/precios/Manga/elpepuesp/20080610elpepinac_11/Tes, Inmobiliarias acusan a Greenpeace de hundir los precios de La Manga. El Pais, June 10, 2008. Last assessed July 2008
38. Special report on emissions scenarios. Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2000, Nakicenovic NSwart R. (Eds.), London, Cambridge University Press
39. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett VR, Codignotto JO, Hay JE, McLean RF, Ragoonaden S, Woodroffe CD. Coastal systems and low-lying areas. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007, 317. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Van Der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, In, eds, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press
40. Nicholson-Cole S. Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication. Comput, Environ Urban Syst 2005, 29:255-273.
41. Olsen JP, March JG. Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics 1989, New York, The Free Press
42. O'Riordan T, Jordan A. Institutions, climate change, and cultural theory: toward a common analytical framework. Global Environ Change 1999, 9:81-93.
43. Orland B, Budthimedhee K, Uusitalo J. Considering virtual worlds as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plann 2001, 54:139-148.
44. Ostrom E. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Ann Rev Polit Sci 1999, 2:493-537.
45. Peters BG. Institutional theory in political science: the new institutionalism 1999, London, Pinter
46. Pidgeon NF, Poortinga W, Rowe G, Jones TH, Walls J, O'Riordan T. Using surveys in public participation processes for risk decisionmaking: the case of the 2003 British GM Nation? public debate. Risk Analysis 2005, 25:467-479.
47. Pierson P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev 2000, 94:251-267.
48. Pierson P. Politics in time: history, insitutions and social analysis 2004, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press
49. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis 1991, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
50. Raskin P. Global scenarios: background review for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems 2005, 8:133-142.
51. Raskin P, Banuri T, Gallopin G, Gutman P, Hammond A, Kates R, Swart R. Great transition: the promise and lure of times ahead 2002, Stockholm Environment Institute
52. Fairness and competence in citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse 1995, Renn OWebler TWiedemann P. (Eds.), Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers
53. Robinson J, Carmichael J, VanWynsberghe R, Tansey J, Journeay M, Rogers L. Sustainability as a problem of design: interactive science in the Georgia Basin. Integr Assess 2006, 6:165-192.
54. Robinson J, Tansey J. Co-production, emergent properties, and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project. Sci Public Policy 2006, 33:151-160.
55. Rotmans J, Van Asselt M. Integrated assessment: a growing child on its way to maturity. Climatic Change 1996, 34:327-336.
56. Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Weik A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S. Making local futures tangible: Synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environ Change 2009, 19:447-463.
57. Sheppard SRJ. Landscape visualization and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environ Sci Policy 2005a, 8:637-654.
58. Sheppard SRJ. Validity, reliability, and ethics in visualization. Visualization in landscape and environmental planning 2005b, Bishop IDLange E. In, eds, London, Taylor and Francis
59. Sheppard SRJ, Meitner M. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualization for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecol Manage 2005, 207:171-187.
60. Sheppard SRJ, Shaw A. Future visioning of local climate change scenarios: Connecting the dots and painting pictures to aid earth system governance. 2007 Amsterdam Conference of the Human Dimension of Global Environmental Change. Earth system governance: theories and strategies for sustainability 2007, Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit
61. Sheppard SRJ, Shaw A, Flanders D, Burch S. Can visualization save the world? Lessons for landscape architects from visualizing local climate change. Digital Design in Landscape Architecture 2008; 9th International Conference on IT in Landscape Architecture 2008, Dessau/Bernburg, Germany, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences
62. Steinitz C, Rojo HMA, Arias H, Bassett S, Flaxman M, Goode T, Maddock T, Mouaat D, Peiser R, Shearer A. Alternative futures for changing landscape: The Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora 2003, Washington, DC, Island Press
63. Stern PC. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. J Social Issues 2000, 56:407-424.
64. Stern PC, Fineberg HV. Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society 1996, Washington, DC, National Research Council
65. Tansey J, Carmichael J, VanWynsberghe R, Robinson J. The future is not what it used to be: participatory integrated assessment in the Georgia Basin. Global Environ Change 2002, 12:97-104.
66. Thelen K. How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis. Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences 2003, 208-239. Mahoney JRueschemeyer D. In, eds, New York, Cambridge University Press
67. Tress B, Tress G. Scenario visualization for participatory landscape planning - a study from Denmark. Landsc Urban Plann 2003, 64:161-178.
68. van Asselt M, Rijkens-Klomp N. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in Integrated Assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environ Change 2002, 12:167-184.
69. Wilbanks T, Kates RW. Global change in local places: how scale matters. Climatic Change 1999, 43:601-628.
70. Winkler H, Baumert K, Blanchard O, Burch S, Robinson J. What factors influence mitigative capacity? Energy Policy 2007, 35:692-703.
71. Yohe GW. Mitigative capacity: the mirror image of adaptive capacity on the emissions side. Climatic Change 2001, 49:247-262.