Using English as a "Model Language" to Understand Language Processing

Motor Speech Disorders: A Cross-Language Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 58-73

  Vitevitch, Michael S ^a   Chan, Kit Ying ^b   Goldstein, Rutherford ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84948844237     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Abd-El-Jawad, H. and Abu-Salim, I. (1987) Slips of the tongue in Arabic and their theoretical interpretation. Language Sciences 9, 145-171.
2. Aichert, I. and Ziegler, W. (2004) Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain & Language 88, 148-159.
3. Altmann, G. (1980) Prolegomena to Menzerath's law. Glottometrika 2, 1-10.
4. Anderson, J.D. and Byrd, C.T. (2008) Phonotactic probability effects in children who stutter. Journal of Speech Language Hearing Research 51, 851-866.
5. Arbesman, S., Strogatz, S.H. and Vitevitch, M.S. (2010) Comparative analysis of networks of phonologically similar words in English and Spanish. Entropy 12, 327-337.
6. Arnold, H.S., Conture, E.G. and Ohde, R.N. (2005) Phonological neighborhood density in the picture naming of young children who stutter: Preliminary study. Journal of Fluency Disorders 30, 125-148.
7. Bates, E., D'Amico, S., Jacobsen, T., Szekely, A., Andonova, E., Devescovi, A., Herron, D., Lu, C.C., Pechmann, T., Pleh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Guterrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K., Mehotcheva, T., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Tzeng, A. and Tzeng, O. (2003) Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 344-380.
8. Berent, I., Lennertz, T., Jun, J., Moreno, M.A. and Smolensky, P. (2008) Language universals in human brains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 5321-5325.
9. Besner, D., Moroz, S. and O'Malley, S. (2011) On the strength of connections between localist mental modules as a source of frequency-of-occurrence effects. Psychological Science 22, 393-398.
10. Bradlow, A.R., Akahane-Yamada, R., Pisoni, D.B. and Tohkura, Y. (1999) Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: Long-term retention of learning in perception and production. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 977-985.
11. Brown, R. and McNeill, D. (1966) The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 5, 325-337.
12. Cholin, J., Dell, G.S. and Levelt, W.J.M. (2011) Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable-frequency effect in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 37, 109-122.
13. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D. and Segui, J. (1986) The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 385-400.
14. Dell, G.S. (1986) A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93, 283-321.
15. Fenk, A., Fenk-Oczlon, G. and Fenk, L. (2006) Syllable complexity as a function of word complexity (Menzerath's law). In V. Solovyev, V. Goldberg and V. Polyakov (eds) The VUIth International Conference 'Cognitive Modeling in Linguistics 2005' (Text Processing and Cognitive Technologies 11) (pp. 324-333). Kazan: Kazan State University.
16. Fromkin, V.A. (1971) The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47, 27-52.
17. Gathercole, S.E., Frankish, C.R., Pickering, S.J. and Peaker, S. (1999) Phonotactic influences on short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition 25, 85-95.
18. Gold rick, M., Folk, J. and Rapp, B. (2010) Mrs. Malaprop's neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language 62, 113-134.
19. Gordon, J.K. and Dell, G.S. (2001) Phonological neighbourhood effects: Evidence from aphasia and connectionist modeling. Brain & Language 79, 21-23.
20. Harley, T.A. and Bown, H.E. (1998) What causes a tip of the tongue state? Evidence for lexical neighbourhood effects in speech production. British Journal of Psychology 89, 151-174.
21. Johnson, C.J., Paivio, A. and Clark, J.M. (1996) Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin 120, 113-139.
22. Jones, G.V. (1989) Back to Woodworth: Role of interlopers in the tip of the tongue phenomenon. Memory & Cognition 17, 69-76.
23. Jones, G.V. and Langford, S. (1987) Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state. Cognition 25, 115-122.
24. Juhasz, B.J. (2005) Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin 131, 684-712.
25. Kilgarriff, A. (2007) Googleology is bad science. Computational Linguistics 33, 147-151.
26. Kubozono, H. (1989) The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: Evidence from speech errors. Language & Speech 32, 249-278.
27. Kucera, H. and Francis, W.N. (1967) Computational Analysis of Present Day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
28. Laganaro, M. and Alario, F.X. (2006) On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 55, 178-196.
29. Lallini, N. and Miller, N. (2011) Do phonological neighbourhood density and phonotactic probability influence speech output accuracy in acquired speech impairment? Aphasiology 25, 176-190.
30. Levelt, W.J.M. and Wheeldon, L. (1994) Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition 50, 239-269.
31. Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A. and Meyer, A.S. (1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22, 1-75.
32. Luce, P.A. and Pisoni, D.B. (1998) Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19, 1-36.
33. MacKain, K.W., Best, C.T. and Strange, W. (1981) Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics 2, 369-390.
34. MacKay, D.G. (1972) The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from speech errors. Cognitive Psychology 3, 210-227.
35. Marslen-Wilson, W.D. and Zwitserlood, P. (1989) Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15, 576-585.
36. Maylor, E.A. (1990) Age, blocking and the tip of the tongue state. British Journal of Psychology 81, 123-134.
37. Meyer, A.S. (1992) Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition 42, 181-211.
38. Mowrey, R.A. and MacKay, I.R.A. (1990) Phonological primitives: Electromyographic speech error evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88, 1299-1312.
39. Munson, B., Swenson, C.L. and Manthei, S.C. (2005) Lexical and phonological organization in children: Evidence form repetition tasks. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 14, 108-124.
40. Nickels, L. and Howard, D. (2004) Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It's the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21, 57-78.
41. Norris, D., McQueen, J.M. and Cutler, A. (2000) Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 23, 299-370.
42. O'Seaghdha, P.G., Chen, J.Y. and Chen, T.M. (2010) Proximate units in word production: Phonological encoding begins with syllables in Mandarin Chinese but with segments in English. Cognition 115, 282-302.
43. Peramunage, D., Blumstein, S.E., Myers, E., Gold rick, M. and Baese-Berk, M. (2011) Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word production: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, 593-603.
44. Pylkkanen, L., Stringfellow, A. and Marantz, A. (2002) Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain and Language 81, 666-678.
45. Schacter, D.L. (1999) The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist 54, 182-203.
46. Sevald, C.A., Dell, G.S. and Cole, J.S. (1995) Syllable structure in speech production: Are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language 34, 807-820.
47. Sheldon, A. and Strange, W. (1982) The acquisition of /r/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English: Evidence that speech production can precede speech perception. Applied Psycholinguistics 3, 243-261.
48. Storkel, H.L. (2001) Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 44, 1321-1337
49. Storkel, H.L. (2004) The emerging lexicon of children with phonological delays: Phonotactic constraints and probability in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 47, 1194-1212.
50. Storkel, H.L. and Hoover, J.R. (2010) An on-line calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density based on child corpora of spoken American English. Behavior Research Methods 42, 497-506.
51. The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium (2005) Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature 437, 69-87.
52. Vitevitch, M.S. (1997) The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech 40, 211-228.
53. Vitevitch, M.S. (2002) The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 28, 735-747.
54. Vitevitch, M.S. (2012) What do foreign neighbors say about the mental lexicon? Bilingualism: Language & Cognition 15, 167-172.
55. Vitevitch, M.S., Luce, P.A., Charles-Luce, J. and Kemmerer, D. (1997) Phonotactics and syllable stress: Implications for the processing of spoken nonsense words. Language and Speech 40, 47-62.
56. Vitevitch, M.S. and Luce, P.A. (1999) Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language 40, 374-408.
57. Vitevitch, M.S., Pisoni, D.B., Kirk, K.I., Hay-McCutcheon, M. and Yount, S.L. (2002) Effects of phonotactic probabilities on the processing of spoken words and nonwords by postlingually deafened adults with cochlear implants. Volta Review 102, 283-302.
58. Vitevitch, M.S. and Sommers, M.S. (2003) The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 491-504.
59. Vitevitch, M.S., Armbruster, J. and Chu, S. (2004) Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 30, 514-529.
60. Vitevitch, M.S. and Luce, P.A. (2004) A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36, 481-487.
61. Vitevitch, M.S. and Rodriguez, E. (2005) Neighborhood density effects in spoken word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 3, 64-73.
62. Vitevitch, M.S. and Stamer, M.K. (2006) The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 21, 760-770.
63. Vitevitch, M.S. and Stamer, M.K. (2009) The influence of neighborhood density (and neighborhood frequency) in Spanish speech production: A follow-up report. University of Kansas, Spoken Language Laboratory Technical Report 1, 1-6.
64. Wright, C.E. (1979) Duration differences between rare and common words and their implications for interpretation of word frequency effects. Memory & Cognition 7, 411-419.
65. Zamuner, T.S. (2009) Phonotactic probabilities at the onset of language development: Speech production and word position. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 49-60.