Do phonological neighbourhood density and phonotactic probability influence speech output accuracy in acquired speech impairment?

Aphasiology

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 176-190

  Lallini, Nicole ^a   Miller, Nick ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acquired speech output impairment; Phonological neighbourhood density; Phonotactic probability

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH DISORDER; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 78651484224     PISSN: 02687038     EISSN: 14645041     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02687031003798247     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2)[CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighbourhoods? Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 568-591.
3. Bizzozero, I., Costato, D., Della Sala, S., Papagano, C., Spinnler, H., & Venneri, A. (2000). Upper and lower face apraxia: Role of the right hemisphere. Brain, 123, 2213-2230.
4. Blumstein, S. (1973). A phonological investigation of aphasic speech. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
5. Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801-838.
6. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.
7. Franklin, S., Turner, J. E., & Ellis, A. W. (1992). The ADA Comprehension Battery. London: Action for Dysphasic Adults.
8. Frisch, S. A., Large, N. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (2000). Perception of wordlikeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 481-496.
9. Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighbourhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82, 113-145.
10. Janse, E. (2005). Neighbourhood density effects in auditory nonword processing in aphasia. Brain and Language, 95, 24-25.
11. Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
12. Kent, R. D. (1996). Hearing and believing: Some limits to the auditory-perceptual assessment of speech and voice disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 7-23.
13. Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239-269.
14. Luce, P. A., & Large, N. R. (2001). Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 565-581.
15. Luce, A. L., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighbourhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
16. McNeil, M. R., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Apraxia of speech: Definition, differentiation, and treatment. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (pp. 311-344). New York: Thieme.
17. Miller, N., Willmes, K., & De Bleser, R. (2000). Psychometric properties of the English Aachen Aphasia Test. Aphasiology, 14, 683-722.
18. Munson, B., & Solomon, N. P. (2004). The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1048-1058.
19. Square-Storer, P. A., Roy, E. A., & Martin, R. E. (1997). Apraxia of speech: Another form of praxis disruption. In L. J. G. Rothi & K. M. Heilman (Eds.), Apraxia: The neuropsychology of action (pp. 173-206). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
20. Stemberger, J. P. (2004). Neighbourhood effects on error rates in speech production. Brain and Language, 90, 413-422.
21. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1998). When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science, 9, 325-329.
22. Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 374-408.