Epigenetic modification maintains intrinsic limb-cell identity in Xenopus limb bud regeneration

Developmental Biology

Volumn 406, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 271-282

  Hayashi, Shinichi ^a   Kawaguchi, Akane ^b   Uchiyama, Ikuo ^c   Kawasumi Kita, Aiko ^a   Kobayashi, Takuya ^a   Nishide, Hiroyo ^c   Tsutsumi, Rio ^d   Tsuru, Kazuhiko ^a   Inoue, Takeshi ^d   Ogino, Hajime ^b   Agata, Kiyokazu ^d   Tamura, Koji ^a   Yokoyama, Hitoshi ^a,e  

^a TOHOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NAGAHAMA INSTITUTE OF BIO SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BASIC BIOLOGY   (Japan)

^d KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cellular memory; Epigenetic modification; Histone; Limb regeneration

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; LYSINE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; 3-DEAZANEPLANOCIN; ADENOSINE; HISTONE; PRIMER DNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLASTEMA; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MEMORY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL GENE; DNA MODIFICATION; EPIGENETICS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HISTONE METHYLATION; HISTONE MODIFICATION; LIMB BUD; LIMB REGENERATION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; XENOPUS TROPICALIS; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANIMAL; DNA METHYLATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETICS; HISTONE CODE; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REGENERATION; TRANSGENIC ANIMAL; XENOPUS;

ADENOSINE; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; BASE SEQUENCE; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA METHYLATION; DNA PRIMERS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HISTONE CODE; HISTONES; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LIMB BUDS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REGENERATION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; XENOPUS;

EID: 84948719330     PISSN: 00121606     EISSN: 1095564X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Akkers R.C., van Heeringen S.J., Jacobi U.G., Janssen-Megens E.M., Francoijs K.J., Stunnenberg H.G., Veenstra G.J. A hierarchy of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 acquisition in spatial gene regulation in Xenopus embryos. Dev. Cell 2009, 17:425-434.
2. Akkers R.C., van Heeringen S.J., Manak J.R., Green R.D., Stunnenberg H.G., Veenstra G.J. ChIP-chip designs to interrogate the genome of Xenopus embryos for transcription factor binding and epigenetic regulation. PloS One 2010, 5:e8820.
3. Andrey G., Montavon T., Mascrez B., Gonzalez F., Noordermeer D., Leleu M., Trono D., Spitz F., Duboule D. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 2013, 340:1234167.
4. Beck C.W., Izpisua Belmonte J.C., Christen B. Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms. Dev. Dyn.: Off. Publi. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2009, 238:1226-1248.
5. Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:6-21.
6. Bogdanovic O., Long S.W., van Heeringen S.J., Brinkman A.B., Gomez-Skarmeta J.L., Stunnenberg H.G., Jones P.L., Veenstra G.J. Temporal uncoupling of the DNA methylome and transcriptional repression during embryogenesis. Genome Res. 2011, 21:1313-1327.
7. Bonfanti L. From hydra regeneration to human brain structural plasticity: a long trip through narrowing roads. Sci. World J. 2011, 11:1270-1299.
8. Brockes J.P. Amphibian limb regeneration: rebuilding a complex structure. Science 1997, 276:81-87.
9. Carlson M.R., Komine Y., Bryant S.V., Gardiner D.M. Expression of Hoxb13 and Hoxc10 in developing and regenerating Axolotl limbs and tails. Dev. Biol. 2001, 229:396-406.
10. Christen B., Beck C.W., Lombardo A., Slack J.M. Regeneration-specific expression pattern of three posterior Hox genes. Dev. Dyn.: Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2003, 226:349-355.
11. Christen B., Slack J.M. FGF-8 is associated with anteroposterior patterning and limb regeneration in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 1997, 192:455-466.
12. Cotney J., Leng J., Oh S., DeMare L.E., Reilly S.K., Gerstein M.B., Noonan J.P. Chromatin state signatures associated with tissue-specific gene expression and enhancer activity in the embryonic limb. Genome Res. 2012, 22:1069-1080.
13. Dunn I.C., Paton I.R., Clelland A.K., Sebastian S., Johnson E.J., McTeir L., Windsor D., Sherman A., Sang H., Burt D.W., Tickle C., Davey M.G. The chicken polydactyly (Po) locus causes allelic imbalance and ectopic expression of Shh during limb development. Dev. Dyn.: Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2011, 240:1163-1172.
14. Ekerot M., Stavridis M.P., Delavaine L., Mitchell M.P., Staples C., Owens D.M., Keenan I.D., Dickinson R.J., Storey K.G., Keyse S.M. Negative-feedback regulation of FGF signalling by DUSP6/MKP-3 is driven by ERK1/2 and mediated by Ets factor binding to a conserved site within the DUSP6/MKP-3 gene promoter. Biochem. J. 2008, 412:287-298.
15. Endo T., Tamura K., Ide H. Analysis of gene expressions during Xenopus forelimb regeneration. Dev. Biol. 2000, 220:296-306.
16. Endo T., Yokoyama H., Tamura K., Ide H. Shh expression in developing and regenerating limb buds of Xenopus laevis. Dev. Dyn.: Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 1997, 209:227-232.
17. French V., Bryant P.J., Bryant S.V. Pattern regulation in epimorphic fields. Science 1976, 193:969-981.
18. Galli A., Robay D., Osterwalder M., Bao X., Benazet J.D., Tariq M., Paro R., Mackem S., Zeller R. Distinct roles of Hand2 in initiating polarity and posterior Shh expression during the onset of mouse limb bud development. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000901.
19. Gardiner D.M., Blumberg B., Komine Y., Bryant S.V. Regulation of HoxA expression in developing and regenerating axolotl limbs. Development 1995, 121:1731-1741.
20. Gomez A.R., Lopez-Varea A., Molnar C., de la Calle-Mustienes E., Ruiz-Gomez M., Gomez-Skarmeta J.L., de Celis J.F. Conserved cross-interactions in Drosophila and Xenopus between Ras/MAPK signaling and the dual-specificity phosphatase MKP3. Dev. Dyn.: Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2005, 232:695-708.
21. Halder G., Johnson R.L. Hippo signaling: growth control and beyond. Development 2011, 138:9-22.
22. Halley-Stott R.P., Gurdon J.B. Epigenetic memory in the context of nuclear reprogramming and cancer. Brief. Funct. Genomics 2013, 12:164-173.
23. Han M.J., An J.Y., Kim W.S. Expression patterns of Fgf-8 during development and limb regeneration of the axolotl. Dev. Dyn.: Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2001, 220:40-48.
24. Hayashi S., Ochi H., Ogino H., Kawasumi A., Kamei Y., Tamura K., Yokoyama H. Transcriptional regulators in the Hippo signaling pathway control organ growth in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Dev. Biol. 2014, 396:31-41.
25. Hayashi S., Tamura K., Yokoyama H. Yap1, transcription regulator in the Hippo signaling pathway, is required for Xenopus limb bud regeneration. Dev. Biol. 2014, 388:57-67.
26. Hellsten U., Harland R.M., Gilchrist M.J., Hendrix D., Jurka J., Kapitonov V., Ovcharenko I., Putnam N.H., Shu S., Taher L., Blitz I.L., Blumberg B., Dichmann D.S., Dubchak I., Amaya E., Detter J.C., Fletcher R., Gerhard D.S., Goodstein D., Graves T., Grigoriev I.V., Grimwood J., Kawashima T., Lindquist E., Lucas S.M., Mead P.E., Mitros T., Ogino H., Ohta Y., Poliakov A.V., Pollet N., Robert J., Salamov A., Sater A.K., Schmutz J., Terry A., Vize P.D., Warren W.C., Wells D., Wills A., Wilson R.K., Zimmerman L.B., Zorn A.M., Grainger R., Grammer T., Khokha M.K., Richardson P.M., Rokhsar D.S. The genome of the Western clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis. Science 2010, 328:633-636.
27. Imokawa Y., Yoshizato K. Expression of Sonic hedgehog gene in regenerating newt limb blastemas recapitulates that in developing limb buds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:9159-9164.
28. Kawakami Y., Rodriguez-Leon J., Koth C.M., Buscher D., Itoh T., Raya A., Ng J.K., Esteban C.R., Takahashi S., Henrique D., Schwarz M.F., Asahara H., Izpisua Belmonte J.C. MKP3 mediates the cellular response to FGF8 signalling in the vertebrate limb. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 5:513-519.
29. Kragl M., Knapp D., Nacu E., Khattak S., Maden M., Epperlein H.H., Tanaka E.M. Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration. Nature 2009, 460:60-65.
30. Langmead B., Salzberg S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:357-359.
31. Logan M., Martin J.F., Nagy A., Lobe C., Olson E.N., Tabin C.J. Expression of Cre Recombinase in the developing mouse limb bud driven by a Prxl enhancer. Genesis 2002, 33:77-80.
32. Martin J.F., Olson E.N. Identification of a prx1 limb enhancer. Genesis 2000, 26:225-229.
33. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011, 17:10-12.
34. McCusker C.D., Gardiner D.M. Positional information is reprogrammed in blastema cells of the regenerating limb of the axolotl (Ambystoma mexicanum). PloS One 2013, 8:e77064.
35. McEwan J., Lynch J., Beck C.W. Expression of key retinoic acid modulating genes suggests active regulation during development and regeneration of the amphibian limb. Dev. Dyn.: Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2011, 240:1259-1270.
36. Molina G.A., Watkins S.C., Tsang M. Generation of FGF reporter transgenic zebrafish and their utility in chemical screens. BMC Dev. Biol. 2007, 7:62.
37. Muneoka K., Holler-Dinsmore G., Bryant S.V. Intrinsic control of regenerative loss in Xenopus laevis limbs. J. Exp. Zool. 1986, 240:47-54.
38. Nieuwkoop P.D., Faber J. Normal Table of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) 1994, Garland Publishing, NewYork.
39. Nottke A., Colaiacovo M.P., Shi Y. Developmental roles of the histone lysine demethylases. Development 2009, 136:879-889.
40. Ogino H., McConnell W.B., Grainger R.M. High-throughput transgenesis in Xenopus using I-SceI meganuclease. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1:1703-1710.
41. Ogino H., McConnell W.B., Grainger R.M. Highly efficient transgenesis in Xenopus tropicalis using I-SceI meganuclease. Mech. Dev. 2006, 123:103-113.
42. Ohgo S., Itoh A., Suzuki M., Satoh A., Yokoyama H., Tamura K. Analysis of hoxa11 and hoxa13 expression during patternless limb regeneration in Xenopus. Dev. Biol. 2010, 338:148-157.
43. Okada Y.K. Tail-Like regeneration of the hind limb in the lizard takydromus tachydromoides. Annot. Zool. Jpn. 1945, 23:13-22.
44. Pan F.C., Chen Y., Loeber J., Henningfeld K., Pieler T. I-SceI meganuclease-mediated transgenesis in Xenopus. Dev. Dyn.: Off. Publ. Am. Assoc. Anat. 2006, 235:247-252.
45. Quinlan A.R., Hall I.M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:841-842.
46. Reynolds P.A., Sigaroudinia M., Zardo G., Wilson M.B., Benton G.M., Miller C.J., Hong C., Fridlyand J., Costello J.F., Tlsty T.D. Tumor suppressor p16INK4A regulates polycomb-mediated DNA hypermethylation in human mammary epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:24790-24802.
47. Riddle R.D., Johnson R.L., Laufer E., Tabin C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 1993, 75:1401-1416.
48. Sagai T., Hosoya M., Mizushina Y., Tamura M., Shiroishi T. Elimination of a long-range cis-regulatory module causes complete loss of limb-specific Shh expression and truncation of the mouse limb. Development 2005, 132:797-803.
49. Sarkies P., Sale J.E. Propagation of histone marks and epigenetic memory during normal and interrupted DNA replication. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69:697-716.
50. Satoh A., Makanae A., Hirata A., Satou Y. Blastema induction in aneurogenic state and Prrx-1 regulation by MMPs and FGFs in Ambystoma mexicanum limb regeneration. Dev. Biol. 2011, 355:263-274.
51. Schuettengruber B., Chourrout D., Vervoort M., Leblanc B., Cavalli G. Genome regulation by polycomb and trithorax proteins. Cell 2007, 128:735-745.
52. Seidel C., Schnekenburger M., Dicato M., Diederich M. Histone deacetylase modulators provided by mother nature. Genes Nutr. 2012, 7:357-367.
53. Shao Z., Zhang Y., Yuan G.C., Orkin S.H., Waxman D.J. MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets. Genome Biol. 2012, 13:R16.
54. Slack J.M., Beck C.W., Gargioli C., Christen B. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of regeneration in Xenopus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 359:745-751.
55. Slack J.M., Lin G., Chen Y. The Xenopus tadpole: a new model for regeneration research. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65:54-63.
56. Stocum D.L. Autonomous development of reciprocally exchanged regeneration blastemas of normal forelimbs and symmetrical himdlimbs. J. Exp. Zool. 1980, 212:361-371.
57. Stocum D.L. The urodele limb regeneration blastema. Determination and organization of the morphogenetic field. Differentiation 1984, 27:13-28. (ISSN: 0301-4681).
58. Suzuki M., Satoh A., Ide H., Tamura K. Nerve-dependent and -independent events in blastema formation during Xenopus froglet limb regeneration. Dev. Biol. 2005, 286:361-375.
59. Suzuki M., Satoh A., Ide H., Tamura K. Transgenic Xenopus with prx1 limb enhancer reveals crucial contribution of MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways in blastema formation during limb regeneration. Dev. Biol. 2007, 304:675-686.
60. Tabin C.J. Why we have (only) five fingers per hand: hox genes and the evolution of paired limbs. Development 1992, 116:289-296.
61. Takabatake Y., Takabatake T., Takeshima K. Conserved and divergent expression of T-box genes Tbx2-Tbx5 in Xenopus. Mech. Dev. 2000, 91:433-437.
62. Tamura K., Ohgo S., Yokoyama H. Limb blastema cell: a stem cell for morphological regeneration. Dev. Growth Differ. 2010, 52:89-99.
63. Tanaka E.M., Ferretti P. Considering the evolution of regeneration in the central nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009, 10:713-723.
64. Taylor A.J., Beck C.W. Histone deacetylases are required for amphibian tail and limb regeneration but not development. Mech. Dev. 2012, 129:208-218.
65. Thermes V., Grabher C., Ristoratore F., Bourrat F., Choulika A., Wittbrodt J., Joly J.S. I-SceI meganuclease mediates highly efficient transgenesis in fish. Mech. Dev. 2002, 118:91-98.
66. Torok M.A., Gardiner D.M., Izpisua-Belmonte J.C., Bryant S.V. Sonic hedgehog (shh) expression in developing and regenerating axolotl limbs. J. Exp. Zool. 1999, 284:197-206.
67. Tschumi P.A. The growth of the hindlimb bud of Xenopus laevis and its dependence upon the epidermis. J. Anat. 1957, 91:149-173.
68. Tseng A.S., Carneiro K., Lemire J.M., Levin M. HDAC activity is required during Xenopus tail regeneration. PloS One 2011, 6:e26382.
69. Vire E., Brenner C., Deplus R., Blanchon L., Fraga M., Didelot C., Morey L., Van Eynde A., Bernard D., Vanderwinden J.M., Bollen M., Esteller M., Di Croce L., de Launoit Y., Fuks F. The polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature 2006, 439:871-874.
70. Visel A., Blow M.J., Li Z., Zhang T., Akiyama J.A., Holt A., Plajzer-Frick I., Shoukry M., Wright C., Chen F., Afzal V., Ren B., Rubin E.M., Pennacchio L.A. ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 2009, 457:854-858.
71. Yakushiji N., Suzuki M., Satoh A., Sagai T., Shiroishi T., Kobayashi H., Sasaki H., Ide H., Tamura K. Correlation between Shh expression and DNA methylation status of the limb-specific Shh enhancer region during limb regeneration in amphibians. Dev. Biol. 2007, 312:171-182.
72. Yakushiji N., Yokoyama H., Tamura K. Repatterning in amphibian limb regeneration: a model for study of genetic and epigenetic control of organ regeneration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 20:565-574.
73. Yano T., Tamura K. The making of differences between fins and limbs. J. Anat. 2013, 222:100-113.
74. Yokoyama H., Ogino H., Stoick-Cooper C.L., Grainger R.M., Moon R.T. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling has an essential role in the initiation of limb regeneration. Dev. Biol. 2007, 306:170-178.
75. Zhang Y., Liu T., Meyer C.A., Eeckhoute J., Johnson D.S., Bernstein B.E., Nusbaum C., Myers R.M., Brown M., Li W., Liu X.S. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 2008, 9:R137.