Cellular and molecular mechanisms of regeneration in Xenopus

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 359, Issue 1445, 2004, Pages 745-751

  Slack, J M W ^a   Beck, C W ^a   Gargioli, C ^a   Christen, B ^a  

^a University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone morphogenetic protein; Limb; Notch; Regeneration; Spinal cord; Xenopus

Indexed keywords

REGENERATION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 2542424180     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1463     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Beck, C. W. & Slack, J. M. W. 1998 Analysis of the developing Xenopus tail bud reveals separate phases of gene expression during determination and outgrowth. Mech. Dev. 72, 41-52.
2. Beck, C. W. & Slack, J. M. W. 1999 A developmental pathway controlling outgrowth of the Xenopus tail bud. Development 126, 1611-1620.
3. Beck, C. W. & Slack, J. M. W. 2002 Notch is required for outgrowth of the Xenopus tail bud. Int. J. Devl Biol. 46, 255-258.
4. Beck, C. W., Whitman, M. & Slack, J. M. W. 2001 The role of BMP signaling in outgrowth and patterning of the Xenopus tail bud. Devl Biol. 238, 303-314.
5. Beck, C. W., Christen, B. & Slack, J. M. W. 2003 Molecular pathways needed for regeneration of spinal cord and muscle in a vertebrate. Devl Cell 5, 429-439.
6. Cambray, N. & Wilson, V. 2002 Axial progenitors with extensive potency are localised to the mouse chordoneural hinge. Development 129, 4855-4866.
7. Cannata, S. M., Bagni, C., Bernardini, S., Christen, B. & Filoni, S. 2001 Nerve-independence of limb regeneration in larval Xenopus laevis is correlated to the level of fgf-2 mRNA expression in limb tissues. Devl Biol. 231, 436-446.
8. Catala, M., Teillet, M. A. & Ledouarin, N. M. 1995 Organization and development of the tail bud analyzed with the quail-chick chimera system. Mech. Dev. 51, 51-65.
9. Christen, B. & Slack, J. M. W. 1997 FGF8 is associated with anteroposterior patterning and limb regeneration in Xenopus. Devl Biol. 192, 455-466.
10. Christen, B. & Slack, J. M. W. 1998 All limbs are not the same. Nature 395, 230-231.
11. Coffman, C. R., Skoglund, P., Harris, W. A. & Kintner, C. R. 1993 Expression of an extracellular deletion of xotch diverts cell fate in Xenopus embryos. Cell 73, 659-671.
12. Davis, R. L. & Kirschner, M. W. 2000 The fate of cells in the tailbud of Xenopus laevis. Development 127, 255-267.
13. Dent, J. N. 1962 Limb regeneration in larvae and metamorphosing individuals of the South African clawed toad. J. Morphol. 110, 61-78.
14. Echeverri, K. & Tanaka, E. M. 2002 Ectoderm to mesoderm lineage switching during axolotl tail regeneration. Science 298, 1993-1996.
15. Echeverri, K., Clarke, J. D. W. & Tanaka, E. M. 2001 In vivo imaging indicates muscle fiber dedifferentiation is a major contributor to the regenerating tail blastema. Devl Biol. 236, 151-164.
16. Endo, T., Yokoyama, H., Tamura, K. & Ide, H. 1997 Shh expression in developing and regenerating limb buds of Xenopus laevis. Devl Dynam. 209, 227-232.
17. Filoni, S. & Bosco, L. 1981 Comparative analysis of the regenerative capacity of caudal spinal cord in larvae of several anuran amphibian species. Ann. Embryol. Morphol. Exp. 2, 199-226.
18. Filoni, S. & Paglialunga, L. 1990 Effect of denervation on hindlimb regeneration in Xenopus laevis larvae. Differentiation 43, 10-19.
19. Gargioli, C. & Slack, J. M. W. 2004 Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration. Development. (In the press.)
20. Goldman, D. C., Martin, G. R. & Tam, P. P. L. 2000 Fate and function of the ventral ectodermal ridge during mouse tail development. Development 127, 2113-2123.
21. Goss, R. J. & Holt, R. 1992 Epimorphic vs tissue regeneration in Xenopus forelimbs. J. Exp. Zool. 261, 451-457.
22. Griffith, C. M., Wiley, M. J. & Sanders, E. J. 1992 The vertebrate tail bud: three germ layers frome one tissue. Anat. Embryol. 185, 101-113.
23. Hsu, D. R., Economides, A. N., Wang, X. R., Eimon, P. M. & Harland, R. M. 1998 The Xenopus dorsalizing factor gremlin identifies a novel family of secreted proteins that antagonize BMP activities. Mol. Cell 1, 673-683.
24. Kanki, J. P. & Ho, R. K. 1997 The development of the posterior body in zebrafish. Development 124, 881-893.
25. Kroll, K. L. & Amaya, E. 1996 Transgenic Xenopus embryos from sperm nuclear transplantations reveal FGF signaling requirements during gastrulation. Development 122, 3173-3183.
26. Kumar, A., Velloso, C. P., Imokawa, Y. & Brockes, J. P. 2000 Plasticity of retrovirus-labelled myotubes in the newt limb regeneration blastema. Devl Biol. 218, 125-136.
27. Lo, D. C., Allen, F. & Brockes, J. P. 1993 Reversal of muscle differentation during limb regeneration in the axolotl. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7230-7234.
28. Matsuda, H., Yokoyama, H., Endo, T., Tamura, K. & Ide, H. 2001 An epidermal signal regulates Lmx-1 expression and dorsal-ventral pattern during Xenopus limb regeneration. Devl Biol. 229, 351-362.
29. Mohun, T. J., Taylor, M. V., Garrett, N. & Gurdon, J. B. 1989 The CARG promoter sequence is necessary for muscle-specific transcription of the cardiac actin gene in Xenopus embryos. EMBO J. 8, 1153-1161.
30. Nye, H. L. D. A. C. J., Chernoff, E. A. G. & Stocum, D. L. 2003 Regeneration of the urodele limb: a review. Devl Dynam. 226, 280-294.
31. Offield, M. F., Hirsch, N. & Grainger, R. M. 2000 The development of Xenopus tropicalis transgenic lines and their use in studying lens developmental timing in living embryos. Development 127, 1789-1797.
32. Pourquié, O. 2001 Vertebrate somitogenesis. A. Rev. Cell. Biol. 17, 311-350.
33. Seale, P. & Rudnicki, M. A. 2000 A new look at the origin, function, and 'stem cells' status of muscle satellite cells. Development 218, 115-124.
34. Seale, P., Sabourin, L. A., Girgis-Gabardo, A., Mansouri, A., Gruss, P. & Rudnicki, M. A. 2000 Pax7 is required for the specification of myogenic satellite cells. Cell 102, 777-786.
35. Slack, J. M. W. 2003 Regeneration research today. Devl Dynam. 226, 162-166.
36. Smit, A. L. 1952 The ontogenesis of the vertebral column of Xenopus laevis (Daudin) with special reference to the segmentation of the metotic region of the skull. Ann. Univ. Stellenbosch 29, 79-136.
37. Smith, W. C. & Harland, R. M. 1992 Expression cloning of noggin, a new dorsalizing factor localized to the Spemann organizer in Xenopus embryos. Cell 70, 829-840.
38. Stefanelli, A. 1951 I fenomeni rigenerativi e degenerativi del midolo spinale caudale degli anfibi a dei rettili. Boll. Zool. 18, 279-290.
39. Summerbell, D., Lewis, J. H. & Wolpert, L. 1973 Positional information in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature 244, 492-496.
40. Suzuki, A., Thies, R. S., Yamaji, N., Song, J. J., Wozney, J. M., Murakami, K. & Ueno, N. 1994 A truncated bone morphogenetic protein-receptor affects dorsal-ventral patterning in the early Xenopus embryo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10255-10259.
41. Tschumi, P. 1957 The growth of the hindlimb bud of Xenopus laevis and its dependence upon the epidermis. J. Anat. 91, 149-173.
42. Tucker, A. S. & Slack, J. M. W. 1995a Tail bud determination in the vertebrate embryo. Curr. Biol. 5, 807-813.
43. Tucker, A. S. & Slack, J. M. W. 1995b The Xenopus laevis tail-forming region. Development 121, 249-262.
44. Tucker, A. S. & Slack, J. M. W. 2004 Independent induction and formation of the dorsal and ventral fins in Xenopus laevis. Devl Dynam. (In the press.)
45. Wheeler, G. N., Hamilton, F. S. & Hoppler, S. 2000 Inducible gene expression in transgenic Xenopus embryos. Curr. Biol. 10, 849-852.
46. Yokoyama, H., Ide, H. & Tamura, K. 2001 FGF-10 stimulates limb regeneration ability in Xenopus laevis. Devl Biol. 233, 72-79.
47. Yokoyama, H., Tamura, S. Y., Endo, J. C., Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C., Tamura, K. & Ide, H. 2000 Mesenchyme with FGF10 expression is responsible for regenerative capacity in Xenopus limb buds. Devl Biol. 219, 18-29.