Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I–II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes

European Spine Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2735-2745

  Aragonés, María ^a   Hevia, Eduardo ^b   Barrios, Carlos ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE VALENCIA SAN VICENTE MÁRTIR   (Spain)

^b Hospital la Fraternidad   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment degeneration; Anterior cervical fusion; Bryan disc; Cervical disc arthroplasty; Randomized clinical trial

Indexed keywords

POLYURETHAN; TITANIUM;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY; ARTHROPLASTY; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DEGENERATIVE DISC DISEASE; DYSPHAGIA; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; META ANALYSIS; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NECK PAIN; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLYURETHANE ON TITANIUM UNCONSTRAINED CERVICAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDARTHROSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REOPERATION; REVIEW; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VASCULAR DISEASE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; CERVICAL VERTEBRA; DEVICES; FEMALE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYURETHANES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REOPERATION; SPINAL FUSION; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84948111050     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: 14320932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4228-z     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N et al (2004) Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:79–85
2. Yang YC, Nie L, Cheng L, Hou Y (2009) Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up. Int Orthop 33:1037–1042
3. Peng-Fei S, Yu-Hua J (2008) Cervical disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion: a comparative study. Int Orthop 32:103–106
4. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH (1999) Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:519–528
5. Buchowski JM, Anderson PA, Sekhon L, Riew KD (2009) Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl. 2):223–232
6. Steinmetz MP, Patel R, Traynelis V, Resnick DK, Anderson PA (2008) Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with fusion in a workers’ compensation population. Neurosurgery 63:741–747 (discussion 747)
7. Chen J, Wang X, Bai W, Shen X, Yuan W (2012) Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 21:674–680
8. Bartels RH, Donk R, Verbeek AL (2010) No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery 66:1153–1160 (discussion 1160)
9. Rousseau MA, Cottin P, Levante S, Nogier A, Lazennec JY, Skalli W (2008) In vivo kinematics of two types of ball-and-socket cervical disc replacements in the sagittal plane: cranial versus caudal geometric center. Spine 33:E6–E9
10. Lazaro BC, Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ, Kowalczyk I, Rabin D, Fink M, Duggal N (2010) Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc. Neurosurg Focus 28:1–8
11. Park JJ, Quirno M, Cunningham MR et al (2010) Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement. Spine 35:E285–E289
12. Kowalczyk I, Lazaro BC, Fink M, Rabin D, Duggal N (2011) Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc. J Neurosurg Spine 15:630–635
13. Chen Y, Yuan W, Wu X et al (2013) The effect of range of motion after single-level discover cervical artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 26:E158–E162
14. Ryu WH, Kowalczyk I, Duggal N (2013) Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Spine J 13:628–634
15. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP, Carlson CS, Goffin J (2004) The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J 4:303S–309S
16. Papadopoulos S (2005) The Bryan cervical disc system. Neurosurg Clin North Am 16:629–636
17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535
18. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/levelsofevidence.asp#levels
19. Lefebvre C, Clarke MJ (2001) Identifying randomised trials. In: Egger M, Smith D, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in healthcare, 2nd edn. BMJ Publishing Group, London
20. Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D et al (2004) Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. CMAJ 170:477–480
21. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (2011) Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 510 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration
22. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 14:409–415
23. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA (2010) Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J 10:469–474
24. Hacker RJ (2005) Cervical disc arthroplasty: a controlled randomized prospective study with intermediate follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine 3:424–428
25. Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L, Hou Y (2009) Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study. Int Orthop 33:1347–1351
26. Riew KD, Buchowski JM, Sasso R et al (2008) Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2354–2364
27. Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB et al (2009) Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J 18:218–231
28. Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC (2010) Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:367–371
29. Coric D, Cassis J, Carew JD, Boltes MO (2010) Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:715–721
30. ®) disc prosthesis for cervical myelopathy: a randomized study with 3-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:3408–3414
31. Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, Heller JG (2011) Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1684–1692
32. Sun Y, Zhao YB, Pan SF, Zhou FF et al (2012) Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration five years after single level cervical fusion and cervical arthroplasty: a retrospective controlled study. Chin Med J 125:3939–3941
33. Zhang X, Zhang X, Chen C et al (2012) Randomized, controlled multicenter, clinical trial comparing BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in China. Spine 37:433–438
34. Young IA, Cleland JA, Michener LA, Brown C (2010) Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale, and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 89:831–839
35. Alvin MD, Abbott E, Lubelski D et al (2014) Cervical arthroplasty: a critical review of the literature. Spine J 14:2231–2245
36. Yin S, Yu X, Zhou S, Yin Z, Qiu Y (2013) Is cervical disc arthroplasty superior to fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:1904–1919
37. McAfee PC, Reah C, Gilder K, Eisermann L, Cunningham B (2012) A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. Spine 37:943–952
38. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH et al (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27:2431–2434
39. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2009) Full-endoscopic anterior decompression versus conventional anterior decompression and fusion in cervical disc herniations. Int Orthop 33:1677–1682
40. Liao JC, Niu CC, Chen WJ, Chen LH (2008) Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with cancellous allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Int Orthop 32:643–648
41. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM et al (2009) Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine 34:101–107
42. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Riew KD (2008) Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine 33:1305–1312
43. Gao Y, Liu M, Li T, Huang F, Tang T, Xiang Z (2013) A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:555–561
44. Yi S, Shin DA, Kim KN (2013) The predisposing factors for the heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine J 13:1048–1054
45. Yi S, Kim KN, Yang MS (2010) Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine 35:1556–1561
46. Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N (2006) Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 4:98–105
47. Baron EM, Soliman AM, Gaughan JP et al (2003) Dysphagia, hoarseness, and unilateral true vocal fold motion impairment following anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 112:921–926
48. Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Fineberg SJ, Singh K (2014) Comparison of revision surgeries for one- to two-level cervical TDR and ACDF from 2002 to 2011. Spine J. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.037
49. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2008) Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine 33:940–948