Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 1556-1561

  Yi, Seong ^a   Kim, Keung Nyun ^a   Yang, Moon Sul ^a   Yang, Joong Won ^a   Kim, Hoon ^a   Ha, Yoon ^a   Yoon, Do Heum ^a   Shin, Hyun Chul ^b  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bryan disc; cervical artificial disc replacement; heterotopic ossification; Mobi C; ProDisc C

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSIFICATION, HETEROTOPIC; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955012641     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c6526b     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, et al. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:943-950
2. Anderson PA, Rouleau JP. Intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Spine 2004;29: 2779-2786
3. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery 2002;51:840-5; discussion 845-847
4. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996;21:995-1000.
5. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 2005;57:759-63; discussion 763.
6. Bartels RH, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report. Neurosurgery 2005;57:E194; discussion E194.
7. Parkinson JF, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;2:377-380
8. Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, et al. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J 2006;6:233-241
9. McCarthy EF, Sundaram M. Heterotopic ossification: a review. Skeletal Radiol 2005;34:609-619
10. Iorio R, Healy WL. Heterotopic ossification after hip and knee arthroplasty: risk factors, prevention, and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002;10: 409-416
11. Toyoda T, Matsumoto H, Tsuji T, et al. Heterotopic ossification after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:760-764
12. Sola S, Hebecker R, Knoop M. Bryan cervical disc prosthesis-three years follow-up. Eur Spine J 2005;14(suppl 1):38.
13. Heidecke V, Burkert W, Brucke M, et al. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease-clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150:453-9; discussion 459.
14. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine 2006;31:2802-2806
15. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, et al. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16:384-389
16. Yi S, Ahn PG, Kim DH, et al. Cervical artificial disc replacement: part 2: clinical experience with the cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Quart 2008; 18:96-103.
17. Puzas JE, Miller MD, Rosier RN. Pathologic bone formation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989:269-281
18. Yi S, Lee DY, Kim DH, et al. Cervical artificial disc replacement: part 1: history, design, and overview of the cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Quart 2008;18:89-95.