Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: A prospective, randomised study

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1347-1351

  Cheng, Lei ^a   Nie, Lin ^a   Zhang, Li ^a   Hou, Yong ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; BONE PLATE; BRYAN CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL SPINE DISLOCATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; ILIAC CREST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RELIABILITY; SHORT FORM 36; SPINE FUSION; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BONE PLATES; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILIUM; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 70349776575     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0655-3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. PA Anderson RC Sasso JP Rouleau 2004 The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results Spine J 4 6 Suppl 303S 309S 15541681 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.026 (Pubitemid 39497319)
2. JD Auerbach BP Wills TC McIntosh 2007 Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy Spine 32 5 527 536 17334286 10.1097/01.brs.0000256915.90236.17 (Pubitemid 46398918)
3. R Bertagnoli JJ Yue F Pfeiffer 2005 Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement J Neurosurg Spine 2 403 410 15871478 10.3171/spi.2005.2.4.0403
4. HH Bohlman SE Emery DB Goodfellow 1993 Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients J Bone Joint Surg Am 75 1298 1307 8408151 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Fht1yqsA%3D%3D
5. W Caspar FH Geisler T Pitzen, et al. 1998 Anterior cervical plate stabilization in one- and two-level degenerative disease: overtreatment or benefit? J Spinal Disord 11 1 11 9493763 10.1097/00002517-199802000-00001 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7lt1OmtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28106286)
6. D DiAngelo K Foley K Vossel, et al. 2000 Anterior cervical plating reverses load transfer through multilevel strut-grafts Spine 25 783 795 10751288 10.1097/00007632-200004010-00005 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3hsFWjtw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30214964)
7. N Duggal GE Pickett DK Mitsis, et al. 2004 Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty Neurosurg Focus 17 E9 15636565 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.9
8. J Goffin A Casey P Kehr, et al. 2002 Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis Neurosurgery 51 840 845 12188968 10.1097/00006123-200209000-00048 (Pubitemid 36331083)
9. J Goffin V Van Calenbergh J van Loon, et al. 2003 Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level Spine 28 2673 2678 14673368 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA (Pubitemid 37543472)
10. AS Hilibrand M Robbins 2004 Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4 6 Suppl 190S 194S 15541666 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007 (Pubitemid 39497304)
11. J Lafuente ATH Casey A Petzold, et al. 2005 The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment cervical spondylosis: 46 consecutive cases J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 4 508 512 15795201 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15436 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7mt12ktg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 40575774)
12. JS Silber DG Anderson SD Daffner, et al. 2003 Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion Spine 28 134 139 12544929 10.1097/00007632-200301150-00008 (Pubitemid 36110079)
13. C Mehren P Suchomel F Grochulla, et al. 2006 Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement Spine 31 2802 2806 17108833 10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5 (Pubitemid 44772781)
14. GE Pickett LH Sekhon WR Sears, et al. 2006 Complications with cervical arthroplasty J Neurosurg Spine 4 98 105 16506475 10.3171/spi.2006.4.2.98 (Pubitemid 47325298)
15. CA Reitman JA Hipp L Nguyen, et al. 2004 Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: a prospective study Spine 29 E221 E226 15167672 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00022
16. RC Sasso JD Smucker RJ Hacker, et al. 2007 Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients Spine 32 2933 2940 18091483 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815d0034 (Pubitemid 350307273)
17. S Peng-Fei J Yu-Hua 2008 Cervical disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion: a comparative study Int Orthop 32 1 103 106 17180356 10.1007/s00264-006-0287-4 (Pubitemid 351170101)
18. TA St John AR Vaccaro AP Sah, et al. 2003 Physical and monetary costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting Am J Orthop 32 18 23 12580346
19. C Wigfield S Gill R Nelson, et al. 2002 Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disease J Neurosurg 96 1 Suppl 17 21 11795709