Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with fusion in a workers' compensation population

Neurosurgery

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 741-747

  Steinmetz, Michael P ^a   Patel, Rakesh ^b   Traynelis, Vincent ^c   Resnick, Daniel K ^d   Anderson, Paul A ^e  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Orthopaedic Associates of Long Island LLP   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Arthroplasty; Cervical spine; Disability; Return to work; Spine fusion; Workers' compensation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERVICAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICOBRACHIAL NEURALGIA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NECK DISSECTION; POPULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SHORT FORM 36; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; CONVALESCENCE; DISKECTOMY; EARLY AMBULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RADICULOPATHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES; WORKERS' COMPENSATION;

EID: 56749144297     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325495.79104.DB     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson PA, Fouleau JP: Intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Spine 29:2779-2786, 2004.
2. Anderson PA, Schwaegler PE, Cizek D, Leverson G: Work status as a predictor of surgical outcome of discogenic low back pain. Spine 31:2510-2515, 2006.
3. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Pfeiffer F, Fenk-Mayer A, Lawrence JP, Kershaw T, Nanieva R: Early results after ProDisc-C cervical disc replacement. J Neurosurg Spine 2:403-410, 2005.
4. Coric D, Finger F, Boltes P: Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan Cervical Disc: Early clinical results from a single investigational site. J Neurosurg Spine 4:31-35, 2006.
5. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, Sgrambiglia R, Pointillart V: Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single level and bi-level. Spine 28:2673-2678, 2003.
6. Goldberg EJ, Singh K, Van U, Garretson R, An HS: Comparing outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in workman's versus non-workman's compensation population. Spine J 2:408-414, 2002.
7. Greenough CG, Fraser RD: The effects of compensation on recovery from low-back injury. Spine 14:947-955, 1989.
8. Hacker RJ: Cervical disc arthroplasty: A controlled randomized prospective study with intermediate follow-up results. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, March 2005. J Neurosurg Spine 3:424-428, 2006.
9. Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts GE Jr: Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery 50:229-238, 2002.
10. Kuhns CA, Geck MJ, Wang JC, Delamrter RB: An outcomes analysis of the treatment of cervical pseudoarthrosis with posterior fusion. Spine 30:2424-2429, 2006.
11. Lancourt J, Kettelhut M: Predicting return to work for lower back pain patients receiving worker's compensation. Spine 17:629-640 1992.
12. Leavitt F: The physical exertion factor in compensable work injuries: A hidden flaw in previous research. Spine 17:307-310, 1992.
13. Mobbs RJ, Gollapudi PR, Chandran NK: Outcome following anterior cervical discectomy in compensation patients. J Clin Neurosci 8:124-125, 2001.
14. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA: Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 6:198-209, 2007.
15. Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Bellera FP, Link HD: Clinical experience with the new artificial cervical PCM (Cervitech) disc. Spine J 4:315S-321S, 2004.
16. Porchet F, Metcalf NH: Clinical outcomes with the Prestige ST II cervical disc: Preliminary results from a prospective randomized clinical trial. Neurosurg Focus 17:E6, 2004.
17. Sanderson PL, Todd BD, Holt GR, Getty CJ: Compensation, work status, and disability in low back pain patients. Spine 20:554-556, 1995.
18. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG: Clinical outcomes of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:481-491, 2007.
19. Sekhon LH: Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 28 [Suppl]:307-313, 2003.
20. Shim CS, Lee SH, Park HJ, Kang HS, Hwang JH: Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:465-470, 2006.
21. Wigfield CC, Gill SS, Nelson RJ, Metcalf NH, Robertson JT: The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: Results from a two-year pilot study. Spine 27:2446-2452, 2002.
22. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD: Lumbar spine arthroplasty: Early results using the ProDisc II: A prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:352-361, 2003.