Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration five years after single level cervical fusion and cervical arthroplasty: A retrospective controlled study

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 125, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 3939-3941

  Yu, Sun ^a   Yan Bin, Zhao ^a   Sheng Fa, Pan ^a   Fei Fei, Zhou ^a   Zhong Qiang, Chen ^a   Zhong Jun, Liu ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY THIRD HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment degeneration; Bryan cervical disc prosthesis; Cervical disc arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CERVICAL ARTHROPLASTY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; LIGAMENT CALCINOSIS; MALE; OSTEOPHYTE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINAL CORD ATROPHY; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; X RAY;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FUSION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84872322474     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.22.004     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 840-847.
2. Walraevens J, Demaerel P, Suetens P, Va n Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Vander Sloten J, et al. Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc. Neurosurgery 2010; 67: 679-687.
3. Zhao YB, Sun Y, Chen ZQ, Liu ZJ. Application of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc: long-term X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up results. Chin Med J 2010; 123: 2999-3002.
4. Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine 2005; 3: 417-423.
5. Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, Arbatin JJ, Chang KY, Park MS, et al. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J 2009; 18: 218-231.
6. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classificationof heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003; 16: 384-389.
7. Pechlivanis I, Thuring T, Brenke C, Seiz M, Thome C, Barth M, et al. Non-fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and implantation of empty polyetheretherketone cages. Spine (Phila PA 1976) 2011; 36: 15-20.
8. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine (Phila PA 1976) 1993; 18: 2167-2173.
9. Gore DR, Sepic SB. Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients. Spine (Phila PA 1976) 1984; 9: 667-671.
10. Park DH, Ramakrishnan P, Cho TH, Lorenz E, Eck JC, Humphreys SC, et al. Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 7: 336-340.
11. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine 2007; 6: 198-209.