|
Volumn 91 Suppl 2, Issue , 2009, Pages 223-232
|
Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. Surgical technique.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTHROPLASTY;
ARTICLE;
CERVICAL SPINE;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONFIDENCE INTERVAL;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY;
DECOMPRESSION SURGERY;
EVALUATION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PROBABILITY;
PROSTHESIS FAILURE;
RADIOGRAPHY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SPINAL CORD DISEASE;
SPINE FUSION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT;
CERVICAL VERTEBRAE;
COHORT STUDIES;
CONFIDENCE INTERVALS;
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES;
DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK;
INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT;
MALE;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
PROBABILITY;
PROSTHESIS FAILURE;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;
SPINAL CORD DISEASES;
SPINAL FUSION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 70350708413
PISSN: None
EISSN: 15351386
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00564 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (41)
|
References (0)
|