Scale-down of continuous protein producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultivations using a two-compartment system

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 152-159

  Risager Wright, Naia ^a   Rønnest, Nanna Petersen ^a   Thykaer, Jette ^b  

^a NOVO NORDISK A S   (Denmark)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Continuous cultivation; Heterologous protein production; S. cerevisiae; Scale down; Two compartment system

Indexed keywords

SUBSTRATES; YEAST;

CONTINUOUS CULTIVATION; HETEROLOGOUS PROTEIN PRODUCTION; S.CEREVISIAE; SCALE DOWN; TWO-COMPARTMENT SYSTEM;

PROTEINS;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; GLUCOSE; OXYGEN; TREHALOSE;

BIOREACTOR; BIOSYNTHESIS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CHEMISTRY; GLYCOLYSIS; PH; PROCEDURES; PROMOTER REGION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOREACTORS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GLUCOSE; GLYCOLYSIS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; OXYGEN; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TREHALOSE;

EID: 84947997194     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2184     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Neubauer P, Junne S. Scale-down simulators for metabolic analysis of large-scale bioprocesses. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010; 21:114-121.
2. Bylund F, Collet E, Enfors S-O, Larsson G. Substrate gradient formation in the large-scale bioreactor lowers yield and increases by-product formation. Bioprocess Eng. 1998; 18:171-180.
3. Larsson G, Törnkvist M, Wernersson ES, Trägårdh, Noorman H, Enfors S-O. Substrate gradients in bioreactors: origin and consequences. Bioprocess Eng. 1996; 14:281-289.
4. Manfredini R, Cavallera V, Marini L, Donati G. Mixing and oxygen transfer in conventional stirred fermenters. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983; XXV:3115-3131.
5. Janakiraman V, Kwiatkowski C, Kshirsager R, Ryll R, Huang Y-M. Application of high-throughput mini-bioreactor system for systematic scale-down modelling, process characterization and control strategy development. Biotechnol Prog. 2015.
6. Ahuja S, Jain S, Ram K. Application of multivariate analysis and mass transfer principles for refinement of a 3-L bioreactor scale-down model-when shake flasks mimic 15, 000-L bioreactors better. Biotechnol Prog. 2015; 31:1370-1380.
7. Han S, Delvigne F, Brognaux A, Charbon GE, Sørensen SJ. Design of growth-dependent biosensors based on destabilized GFP for the detection of physiological behavior of Escherichia coli in heterogeneous bioreactors. Biotechnol Prog. 2013; 29:553-563.
8. Abel C, Hübner U, Schügerl K. Transient behaviour of Baker's yeast during enforced periodical variation of dissolved oxygen concentration. J Biotechnol. 1994; 32:45-57.
9. Carlquist M, Fernandes RL, Helmark S, Heins A, Lundin L, Sørensen SJ, Gernaey KV, Lantz AE. Physiological heterogeneities in microbial populations and implications for physical stress tolerance. Microb Cell Factories. 2012; 11:94
10. George S, Larsson G, Enfors S-O. A scale-down two-compartment reactor with controlled substrate oscillations: metabolic response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioprocess Eng. 1993; 9:249-257.
11. Sweere APJ, Matla YA, Zandvliet J, Luyben KCAM, Kossen NWF. Experimental simulation of glucose fluctuations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1988; 28:109-115.
12. Abel C, Linz F, Scheper T, Schügerl K. Transient behaviour of continuously cultivated Baker's yeast during enforced variations of dissolved oxygen and glucose concentrations. J Biotechnol. 1994; 33:183-193.
13. Buziol S, Warth L, Magario I, Freund A, Siemann-Herzberg M, Reuss M. Dynamic response of the expression of hxt1, hxt5 and hxt7 transport proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to perturbations in the extracellular glucoses concentration. J Biotechnol. 2008; 134:203-210.
14. Heins A, Fernandes RL, Gernaey K, Lantz AE. Experimental and in silico investigation of population heterogeneity in continuous Sachharomyces cerevisiae scale-down fermentation in a two-compartment setup. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2014; 90:324-340.
15. Sweere APJ, Mesters JR, Janse L, Luyben KCAM, Kossen NWF. Experimental simulation of oxygen profiles and their influence on Baker's yeast production: I. One-fermentor system. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988; 31:567-578.
16. Lejeune A, Delvigne F, Thonart P. Influence of bioreactor hydraulic characteristics on a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fed-batch culture: hydrodynamic modelling and scale-down investigations. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 37:225-236.
17. Liu Z, Tyo KEJ, Martinz JL, Petranovic D, Nielsen J. Different expression systems for production of recombinant proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012; 109:1295-1268.
18. Seresht AK, Cruz AL, de Hulster E, Hebly M, Palmqvist EA, van Gulik W, Daran J-M, Pronk J, Olsson L. Long-term adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the burden of recombinant insulin production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013; 110:2749-2763.
19. Verduyn C. Physiology of yeasts in relation to biomass yields. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoe. 1991; 60:325-353.
20. Lara AR, Galindo E, Ramirez OT, Palomares LA. Living with heterogeneities in bioreactors. Mol Biotechnol. 2006; 6:355-381.
21. Poulsen BR, Jørgen J, Iversen L. Mixing determinations in reactor vessels using linear buffers. Chem Eng Sci. 1997; 52:979-984.
22. Mashego MR, Jansen MLA, Vinke JL, van Gulik WM, Heijnen JJ. Changes in the metabolome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae associated with evolution in aerobic glucose-limited chemostats. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005; 5:419-430.
23. Jansen MLA, Diderich JA, Mashego M, Hassane A, de Winde JH, Daran-Lapujade P, Pronk JT. Prolonged selection in aerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes a partial loss of glycolytic capacity. Microbiology (Reading England) 2005; 151:1657-1669.
24. Brown CJ, Todd KM, Rosenzweig RF. Multiple duplications of yeast hexose transport genes in response to selection in a glucose-limited environment. Mol Biol Evol. 1998; 15:931-942.
25. Ferea TL, Botstein D, Brown PO, Rosenzweig RF. Systematic changes in gene expression patterns following adaptive evolution in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999; 96:9721-9726.
26. Parrou J-L, Enjalbert B, Plourde L, Bauche A, Gonzalez B, François J. Dynamic responses of reserve carbohydrate metabolism under carbon and nitrogen limitations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1999; 15:191-203.
27. Gresham D, Hong J. The functional basis of adaptive evolution in chemostats. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014; 2:2-16.
28. George S, Larsson G, Olsson K, Enfors S-O. Comparison of the Baker's yeast process performance in laboratory and production scale. Bioprocess Eng. 1998; 18:135-142.
29. Reifenberger E, Boles E, Ciriacy M. Kinetic characterization of individual hexose transporters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their relation to the triggering mechanisms of glucose repression. Eur J Biochem. 1997; 245:324-333.
30. 13C labeling. 2014. Biotechnol J. 2014; 9:372-385.
31. Sweere APJ, Mesters JR, Janse L, Luyben KCAM, Kossen NWF. Experimental simulations of oxygen profiles and their influence on baker's yeast production: II. Two-fermentor system. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1988; 31:579-586.