Seven dimensions of contemporary participation disentangled

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 474-488

  Kelty, Christopher ^a,b   Panofsky, Aaron ^b   Currie, Morgan ^a,b   Crooks, Roderic ^a,b   Erickson, Seth ^a,b   Garcia, Patricia ^a,b   Wartenbe, Michael ^a,b   Wood, Stacy ^a,b  

^a GSEandIS Building ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

collaboration; concepts; Internet

Indexed keywords

CITIZEN SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; CONCEPTS; DESIGN PRACTICE; MULTIDIMENSIONALITY; PEER PRODUCTION; USER-GENERATED CONTENT;

INTERNET;

EID: 84947941824     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23202     Document Type: Article

References (164)

1. Andersson, J., (2012). Learning from the file-sharers: Civic modes of justification versus industrial ones. Arts Marketing: An International Journal, 2 (2), 104-117.
2. Arazy, O., Yeo, L., &, Nov, O., (2013). Stay on the Wikipedia task: When task-related disagreements slip into personal and procedural conflicts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64 (8), 1634-1648.
3. Arendt, H., (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Arnstein, S.R., (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216-224.
5. Asaro, P., (2000). Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 10 (4), 257-290.
6. Attewell, P., (1987). The deskilling controversy. Work and Occupations, 14 (3), 323-346.
7. Bachrach, P., & Aryeh Botwinick. (1992). Power and empowerment: A radical theory of participatory democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
8. Bachrach, P., &, Baratz, M., (1970). Power and poverty theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Benkler, Y., (2002). Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and "The Nature of the Firm." The Yale Law Journal, 112 (3), 369-446.
10. Benkler, Y., (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. Benkler, Y., (2011). The penguin and the Leviathan: The triumph of cooperation over self-interest. New York: Crown Business.
12. Berry, D., (2008). Copy, rip, burn: The politics of copyleft and open source. London: Pluto Press.
13. Bishop, C., (2006). Participation. London, Cambridge, MA: Whitechapel, MIT Press.
14. Bishop, C., (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London, New York: Verso Books.
15. Blumberg, P., (1969). Industrial democracy the sociology of participation. New York: Schocken Books.
16. Boellstorff, T., (2008) Coming of age in Second Life: an anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
17. Bourdieu, P., (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Bourriaud, N., (2002). Relational aesthetics. Dijon, France: Les Presses du re'el.
19. Boyle, J., (1996). Shamans, software, and spleens: Law and the construction of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Boyle, J., (2003). The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1/2), 33-74.
21. Boyle, J., (2008). The public domain: Enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Brabham, D.C., (2012). The myth of amateur crowds. Information, Communication & Society, 15 (3), 394-410.
23. Braverman, H., (1975). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
24. Broca, S., (2012). L'utopie du logiciel libre: La construction de projets de transformation sociale en lien avec le mouvement du free software. Ph.D Dissertation, Université I, Paris: Sorbonne.
25. Brown, W., (1995). States of injury: Power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
26. Burawoy, M., (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Cabannes, Y., (2004). Participatory budgeting: A significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environment and Urbanization, 16 (1), 27-46.
28. Carpentier, N., (2011a). Media and participation: A site of ideological-democratic struggle. Bristol, UK, Chicago: Intellect.
29. Carpentier, N., (2011b). New configurations of the audience? The challenges of user-generated content for audience theory and media participation. In, V. Nightingale, (Ed.), The handbook of media audiences (ch. 9). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
30. Chan, A.S., (2007). Retiring the network spokesman: The poly-vocality of free software networks in Peru. Science Studies, 20 (2), 78-99.
31. Chopra, S., &, Dexter, S., (2007). Free software and the political philosophy of the cyborg world. SIGCAS Computing Society, 37 (2), 41-52.
32. Christen, K., (2012). Does information really want to be free? Indigenous knowledge systems and the question of openness. International Journal of Communication 6, 2870-2893.
33. Coch, L., &, French, J.R., (1948). Overcoming resistance to change. Human Relations, 1 (4), 512-534.
34. Cohen, J.M., &, Uphoff, N.T., (1980). Participation's place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity. World Development, 8 (3), 213-235.
35. Cole, G., (1944). A century of co-operation. London: G. Allen & Unwin for the Co-operative Union.
36. Coleman, E.G., (2012). Coding freedom: The ethics and aesthetics of hacking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
37. Coleman, G., (2004). The political agnosticism of free and open source software and the inadvertent politics of contrast. Anthropological Quarterly, 77 (3), 507-519.
38. Coleman, G., (2009). Code is speech: Legal tinkering, expertise, and protest among free and open source software developers. Cultural Anthropology, 24 (3), 420-454.
39. Cook, T.E., &, Morgan, P.M., (1971). Participatory democracy. San Francisco: Canfield Press.
40. Cooke, B., &, Kothari, U., (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? London: Zed Books.
41. Cornwall, A., (2011). The participation reader. London, New York: Zed Books.
42. Currie, M., Kelty, C., &, Murillo, L.F.R., (2013). Free software trajectories: From organized publics to formal social enterprises? Journal of Peer Production, 1 (3), online.
43. Dachler, H.P., &, Wilpert, B., (1978). Conceptual dimensions and boundaries of participation in organizations: A critical evaluation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23 (1), 1-39.
44. Delwiche, A., (2013). The participatory cultures handbook., A. Delwiche, &, J. Henderson, Eds. New York: Routledge.
45. Derber, C., &, Schwartz, W., (1983). Toward a theory of worker participation. Sociological Inquiry, 53 (I), 61-78.
46. Derber, M., (1970). The American idea of industrial democracy, 1865-1965. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
47. Desrosières, A., (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Deuze, M., (2006). Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The Information Society, 22 (2), 63-75.
49. Didier, E., (2009). En quoi consiste L'Amérique? Les statistiques, le new deal et la démocratie (p. 317). Paris: Editions La Découverte.
50. Ding, Y., Jacob, E.K., Zhang, Z., Foo, S., Yan, E., George, N.L.,... (2009). Perspectives on social tagging. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (12), 2388-2401.
51. Dreyfus, H., (2001). On the internet. London, New York: Routledge.
52. Du Gay, P., (2000). In praise of bureaucracy? Weber, organization, ethics. London, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
53. Durkheim, E., (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life, a study in religious sociology. London, New York: G. Allen & Unwin; Macmillan.
54. Durkheim, E., (1964). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
55. Earl, J., &, Kimport, K., (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the internet age., J. Earl, &, K. Kimport, (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56. Epstein, S., (2008). The rise of "recruitmentology": Clinical research, racial knowledge, and the politics of inclusion and difference. Social Studies of Science, 38 (5), 801-832.
57. Etzioni, A., (1995). New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
58. Fang, Y., (2009). Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25 (4), 9-50.
59. Farrell, H., (2012). The consequences of the internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15 (1), 35-52.
60. Felstiner, A., (2012). The weakness of crowds. Limn, 1 (2). http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/19n045tk
61. Fish, A., (2013). Participatory television: Convergence, crowdsourcing, and neoliberalism. Communication, Culture, and Critique, 6 (3), 372-395.
62. Fish, A., Murillo, L., Nguyen, L., Panofsky, A., &, Kelty, C., (2011). Birds of the internet: Towards a field guide to participation and governance. Journal of Cultural Economy, 4 (2), 157-187.
63. Fish, A., &, Srinivasan, R., (2011). Digital labor is the new killer app. New Media & Society, 14 (1), 137-152.
64. Fisher, E., (2012). How less alienation creates more exploitation? Audience labour on social network sites. tripleC-Cognition, Communication, Co-operation, 10 (2), 171-183.
65. Fiske, J., (2011). Television culture (2nd ed.). London, New York: Routledge.
66. Follett, M., (1940). Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper.
67. Freeman, R., &, Medoff, J.L., (1984). What do unions do? New York: Basic Books.
68. Frieling, R., (2008). The art of participation: 1950 to now. San Francisco, New York: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art in association with Thames & Hudson.
69. Fuchs, C., (2010). Web 2.0, prosumption, and surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 8 (3), 288-309.
70. Fung, A., &, Wright, E.O., (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. New York: Verso.
71. Geiger, D., Seedorf, S., Schulze, T., Nickerson, R. C., &, Schader, M., (2011). Managing the crowd: Towards a taxonomy of crowdsourcing processes. AMCIS 2011 Proceedings, All Submissions (2011).
72. Gibson, R.K., Römmele, A., &, Ward, S., (2004). Electronic democracy: Mobilisation, organisation and participation via new ICTs., R.K. Gibson, A. Römmele, &, S.J. Ward, (Eds.). London, New York: Routledge.
73. Gladwell, M., (2010). Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. The New Yorker (Oct. 4) Online at: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/10/04/101004fa-fact-gladwell.
74. Goldberg, G., (2010). Rethinking the public/virtual sphere: The problem with participation. New Media & Society, 13 (5), 739-754.
75. Graeber, D., (2004). Fragments of an anarchist anthropology. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press, Distributed by University of Chicago Press.
76. Graeber, D., (2009). Direct action: An ethnography. Edinburgh, UK, Oakland, CA: AK Press.
77. Graeber, D., (2013). The democracy project: A history, a crisis, a movement (1st ed.). New York: Spiegel & Grau.
78. Gregory, J., (2003). Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19 (1), 62-74.
79. Griffen-Foley, B., (2004). From tit-bits to big brother: A century of audience participation in the media. Media, Culture & Society, 26 (4), 533-548.
80. Habermas, J., (1992). The structural transformation of the public sphere: Inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (New Ed.). London: Polity Press.
81. Hacking, I., (1990). The taming of chance (1st ed., p. 277). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Hayden, T., (1962). The Port Huron Statement. In, A. Breines, &, W. Bloom, (Eds.), Takin' it to the streets (3rd ed). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (pp. 50 -61).
83. Hippel, E., von,. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Hirschman, A., (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. Hoofnagle, C.J., (2009). Beyond Google and evil: How policy makers, journalists and consumers should talk differently about Google and privacy. First Monday, 14 (4-6), 2009.
86. Igo, S., (2007). The averaged American: Surveys, citizens, and the making of a mass public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. Irani, L., (2012). Microworking the crowd. Limn, 1 (2). http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7vc0r3sh
88. Irwin, A., &, Wynne, B., (1996). Misunderstanding science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
89. Jacoby, S.M., (1983). Union-management cooperation in the United States: Lessons from the 1920s. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37.
90. Jenkins, H., (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans & participatory culture. New York: Routledge.
91. Jenkins, H., (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
92. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., &, Robison, A.J., (2007). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago: Mellon Foundation.
93. Joss, S., &, Durant, J., (1995). Public participation in science (p. 148). London: Science Museum, NMSI Trading.
94. Kang, H., &, McAllister, M.P., (2011). Selling you and your clicks: Examining the audience commodification of Google. tripleC-Cognition, Communication, Co-operation 9 (2). Available at: http://triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/viewArticle/255
95. Kaufman, A.S., (1960). Human nature and participatory democracy. In, C. Friedrich, (Ed.), Responsibility. New York: Atherton.
96. Ke, W., (2009). Motivations in open source software communities: The mediating role of effort intensity and goal commitment. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13 (4), 39-66.
97. Kelty, C.M., (2013). From participation to power. In, A. Delwiche, &, J. Henderson, (Eds.), Participatory cultures handbook (pp. 22-32). London, New York: Routledge.
98. Kensing, F., &, Blomberg, J., (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7 (3), 167-185.
99. Kreiss, D., Finn, M., &, Turner, F., (2010). The limits of peer production: Some reminders from Max Weber for the Network Society. New Media & Society, 13 (2), 243-259.
100. Krishnamurthy, S., (2006). On the intrinsic and extrinsic motivation of free/libre/open source (FLOSS) developers. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 18 (4), 17-39.
101. Lakhani, K., (2003). How open source software works: "Free" user-to-user assistance. Research Policy, 32 (6), 923-943.
102. Lakhani, K., &, Wolf, R., (2005). Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects (pp. 3-22). In, J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, &, K. Lakhani, (Eds.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Latour, B., (2005). Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy. Cambridge, MA, Karlsruhe, Germany: MIT Press, ZKM/Center for Art and Media in Karlsruhe.
104. Lee, D.J., (1981). Skill, craft and class: A theoretical critique and a critical case. Sociology, 15 (1), 56-78.
105. Lessig, L., (2005). Free culture: The nature and future of creativity (p. 368). New York: Penguin.
106. Lessig, L., (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin.
107. Lezaun, J., (2011). Offshore democracy: Launch and landfall of a socio-technical experiment. Economy and Society, 40 (4), 553-581.
108. Lichtenstein, N., (1993). Industrial democracy in America: The ambiguous promise. Washington, DC, Cambridge, UK, New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Cambridge University Press.
109. Lovink, G., (2007). The art of free cooperation. New York: Autonomedia.
110. Lovink, G., (2011). Networks without a cause: A critique of social media. Cambridge, UK, Malden MA: Polity.
111. Macpherson, C.B., (1980). Pluralism, individualism, and participation. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1 (1), 21-30.
112. Marcolin, M., D'Andrea, V., &, Hakken, D., (2012). Participatory maintenance-in-use. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference on Exploratory Papers, Workshop Descriptions, Industry Cases (Vol. 2) PDC '12 (p. 57). New York: ACM Press.
113. Marres, N., (2009). Testing powers of engagement: Green living experiments, the ontological turn and the undoability of involvement. European Journal of Social Theory, 12 (1), 117-133.
114. Marres, N., (2012). Material participation: Technology, the environment and everyday publics. Houndmills Basingstoke, Hampshire UK, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
115. Marx, K., (1964). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1844. New York: International Publishers.
116. Mauss, M., (1990). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies. New York: W.W. Norton.
117. Mayo, E., (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: Macmillan.
118. McCartin, J., (1997). Labor's great war: The struggle for industrial democracy and the origins of modern American labor relations, 1912-1921. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
119. Miller, J., (1987). Democracy is in the streets: From Port Huron to the siege of Chicago. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120. Montgomery, D., (1979). Workers' control in America: Studies in the history of work, technology, and labor struggles. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.
121. Morozov, E., (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
122. Mutz, D.C., (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. Journal of Communication (Vol. 57). New York: Cambridge University Press.
123. Nov, O., Naaman, M., &, Ye, C., (2009). Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (3), 555-556.
124. OHern, M., &, Rindfleisch, A., (2010). Customer co-creation: A typology and research agenda, in Naresh K. Malhotra (ed.) Review of marketing research (Review of marketing research, volume 6), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 84-106.
125. Oudshoorn, N., (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
126. Oz, A., (2012). Legitimacy and efficacy: The blackout of Wikipedia. First Monday, 17 (12).
127. Parfitt, T., (2004). The ambiguity of participation: A qualified defence of participatory development. Third World Quarterly, 25 (3), 537-555.
128. Pariser, E., (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.
129. Pateman, C., (1976). Participation and democratic theory (p. 122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
130. Pateman, C., (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10 (01), 7-19.
131. Petersen, S.M., (2008). Loser generated content: From participation to exploitation. First Monday, 13 (3).
132. Postigo, H., (2011). Questioning the Web 2.0 discourse: Social roles, production, values, and the case of the human rights portal. The Information Society, 27 (3), 181-193.
133. Prainsack, B., (2011). Voting with their mice: Personal genome testing and the "participatory turn" in disease research. Accountability in Research, 18 (3), 132-147.
134. Rahnema, M., (1990). Participatory action research: The "last temptation of saint" development. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 15 (2), 199-226. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
135. Roethlisberger, F., &, Mayo, E., (1949). Management and morale. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
136. Rosenbaum, H., &, Shachaf, P., (2010). A structuration approach to online communities of practice: The case of Q&A communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61 (9), 1933-1944.
137. Rowe, G., (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30 (2), 251-290.
138. Schäfer, M., (2011). Bastard culture!: How user participation transforms cultural production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
139. Scholz, T., (2013). Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory. New York: Routledge.
140. Schüll, N.D., (2012). The touch-point collective: Crowd contouring on the casino floor. Limn, 2. Retrieved from: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3sq2m8z2
141. Sennett, R., (2008). The craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
142. Smith, J., (2005). The frenzy of the audible: Pleasure, authenticity, and recorded laughter. Television & New Media, 6 (1), 23-47.
143. Söderberg, J., (2002). Copyleft vs. copyright: A Marxist critique. First Monday, 7 (3).
144. Söderberg, J., (2008). Hacking capitalism: The free and open source software movement. New York: Routledge.
145. Srinivasan, R., (2013). Bridges between cultural and digital worlds in revolutionary Egypt. The Information Society, 29 (1), 49-60.
146. Strauss, G., (2006). Worker participation: Some under-considered issues. Industrial Relations, 45 (4), 778-803.
147. Taylor, F., (1967). The principles of scientific management. New York: Norton.
148. Taylor, C., (1994). Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
149. Terranova, T., (2004). Network culture: Politics for the information age. London, Ann Arbor MI: Pluto Press.
150. Tocqueville, A., (2000). Democracy in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
151. Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M., &, McKeon, M., (2007). The hidden order of Wikipedia (pp. 445-454). In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Online Communities and Social Computing.
152. Walzer, M., (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
153. Wampler, B., (2012). When does participatory democracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil. Comparative Politics, 41 (1), 61-81.
154. Wampler, B., &, Avritzer, L., (2008). Participatory publics: Civil society and new institutions in democratic Brazil. Comparative Politics, 36 (3), 291-312.
155. Webb, S., &, Webb, B., (1902). Industrial democracy. London, New York: Longmans Green.
156. Weber, M., (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
157. Wellman, B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J., &, Hampton, K., (2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital: Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3), 436-455.
158. Wenger, E., (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization. 7 (2), 225-246.
159. Wiggins, A., &, Crowston, K., (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). IEEE.
160. Woodworth, W., (1985). Industrial democracy: Strategies for community revitalization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
161. Wynne, B., (1996). May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, 44-83.
162. Wynne, B., (2007). Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: an International Journal, 1 (1), 99-110.
163. Xu, C., Ma, B., Chen, X., &, Ma, F., (2013). Social tagging in the scholarly world. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64 (10), 2045-2057.
164. Yi, K., (2012). Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63 (12), 2488-2502.