Social tagging in the scholarly world

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 64, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 2045-2057

  Xu, Chen ^a   Ma, Benjiang ^a   Chen, Xiaohong ^a   Ma, Feicheng ^b  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

bibliometrics; network analysis; organization of information

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; BIBLIOMETRICS; HIGH TECH COMPANIES; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERFACES; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; INTERFACE DESIGNS; ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATIONS; RESEARCH DOMAINS;

ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

RESEARCH;

EID: 84883872853     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22903     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Allen, R.S., (2001). Interdisciplinary research: A literature-based examination of disciplinary intersections using a common tool, geographic information system (GIS). Science & Technology Libraries, 21, 191-209.
2. Ardanuy, J., Urbano, C., &, Quintana, L., (2009). The evolution of recent research on Catalan literature through the production of PhD theses: A bibliometric and social network analysis. Information Research, 14, 404-421.
3. Bhowmick, S., (2011). Computer science conference rankings. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. Retrieved from http://www.ntu.edu.sg/home/ assourav/crank.htm
4. Brown, C., Snodgrass, T., Kemper, S.J., Herman, R., &, Covington, M.A., (2008). Automatic measurement of propositional idea density from part-of-speech tagging. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 540-545.
5. Chu, H., &, Xu, C., (2009). Web 2.0 and its dimensions in the scholarly world. Scientometrics, 80, 717-729.
6. Fichter, D., (2004). Tools for finding things again. Online, 28, 52-55.
7. Freeland, R.S., Ayers, P.D., Wilkerson, J.B., &, Rowe, J.P., (2010). Plant survival assessment on wetland and stream mitigation sites using GPS/GIS geotagging. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 26, 701-706.
8. Golder, S.A., &, Huberman, B.A., (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32, 198-208.
9. Greene, M., (2007). The demise of the lone author. Nature, 450, 1165.
10. Hagen, N., (2010). Harmonic publication and citation counting: Sharing authorship credit equitably-not equally, geometrically or arithmetically. Scientometrics, 84, 785-793.
11. Hammond, T., Hannay, T., Lund, B., &, Scott, J., (2005). Social bookmarking tools (I): A general review. D-Lib Magazine, 11. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html
12. Humphries, L., (2000). Extras-itList and other bookmark managers [Blog]. Retrieved from http://www.llrx.com/extras/itlist.htm
13. Mathes, A., (2004). Folksonomies-cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata [Blog]. Retrieved from http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies. html
14. McMillan, G.S., &, Casey, D.L., (2007). Research note: Identifying the invisible colleges of the british journal of industrial relations: A bibliometric and social network approach. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45, 815-828.
15. Millen, D.R., Feinberg, J., &, Kerr, B., (2005). Social bookmarking in the enterprise. Queue, 3, 28-35.
16. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N.P., &, Bachrach, D.G., (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, 641-720.
17. Ramos-Rodriguez, A., &, Ruiz-Navarro, J., (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980-2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 981-1004.
18. Reid, E.O.F., (1997). Evolution of a body of knowledge: An analysis of terrorism research. Information Processing & Management, 33, 91-106.
19. Repiso, R., Torres, D., &, Delgado, E., (2011). Bibliometric and social network analysis applied to television dissertations presented in Spain (1976/2007). Comunicar, 37, 151-159.
20. Scott, J., (Ed.). (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London, England: Sage.
21. Sturtz, D.N., (2004). Communal categorization: The folksonomy [Blog]. Retrieved from http://davidsturtz.com/drexel/622/sturtz-folksonomy.pdf
22. Tennis, J.T., (2005). Comparative functional analysis of boundary infrastructures, library classification, and social tagging. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 29, 501.
23. Trant, J., (2009). Studying social tagging and folksonomy: A review and framework. Journal of Digital Information, 10, 4.
24. Vander Wal, T., (2007). Folksonomy coinage and definition. Off the top [Blog]. Retrieved from http://vanderwal.net/folksonomy.html
25. Van Raan, A.F.J., (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics, 67, 491-502.
26. Wasserman, S., &, Faust, K., (Eds.). (2003). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Wuchty, S., Jones, B.F., &, Uzzi, B., (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316, 1036-1039.
28. Zaïane, O.R., (2011). Computer science conference rankings. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: The University of Alberta. Retrieved from http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/~zaiane/htmldocs/ConfRanking.html
29. Zhao, D., &, Logan, E., (2002). Citation analysis using scientific publications on the web as data source: A case study in the XML research area. Scientometrics, 54, 449-472.