Quality of Grasping and the Role of Haptics in a 3-D Immersive Virtual Reality Environment in Individuals With Stroke

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1047-1055

  Levin, Mindy F ^a,b   Magdalon, Eliane C ^c   Michaelsen, Stella M ^d   Quevedo, Antonio A F ^c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CENTRE FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION OF GREATER MONTREAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^d SANTA CATARINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Apertures; Grasping; Indexes; Kinematics; Thumb; Wrist

Indexed keywords

KINEMATICS;

APERTURES; GRASPING; INDEXES; THUMB; WRIST;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

AGED; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ARM; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONVALESCENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; TRUNK; UPPER LIMB; VERY ELDERLY; VISION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARM; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TORSO; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84947057908     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2387412     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. K. Laver, S. George, J. Ratcliffe, C. Whitehead, O. Davies, and M. Crotty, "Use of an interactive video gaming program compared with conventional physiotherapy for hospitalised older adults: A feasibility trial," Disabil. Rehabil., vol. 34, no. 21, pp. 1801-1808, Jan. 2012.
2. K. R. Lohse, C. E. Lang, and L. A. Boyd, "Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation," Stroke, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2053-2058, Jul. 2014.
3. N. M. Otterman, P. J. van der Wees, J. Bernhardt, and G. Kwakkel, "Physical therapists' guideline adherence on early mobilization and intensity of practice at Dutch acute stroke units a country-wide survey," Stroke, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 2395-2401, Sep. 2012.
4. D. Levac, C. Missiuna, L. Wishart, C. DeMatteo, and V. Wright, "Documenting the content of physical therapy for children with acquired brain injury: Development and validation of the motor learning strategy rating instrument," Phys. Ther., vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 689-699, May 2011.
5. M. S. Cameirão, S. B. Badia, E. Duarte, A. Frisoli, and P. F. M. J. Verschure, "The combined impact of virtual reality neurorehabilitation and its interfaces on upper extremity functional recovery in patients with chronic stroke," Stroke, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2720-2728, 2012.
6. G. G. Fluet, A. S. Merians, Q. Qiu, I. Lafond, S. Saleh, V. Ruano, A. R. Delmonico, and S. V. Adamovich, "Robots integrated with virtual reality simulations for customized motor training in a person with upper extremity hemiparesis: A case study," J. Neurol. Phys. Ther., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 79-86, Jun. 2012.
7. S. K. Subramanian, C. B. Lourenço, G. Chilingaryan, H. Sveistrup H, and M. F. Levin, "Arm-motor recovery using a virtual reality intervention in chronic stroke: Randomized control trial," Neurorehabil. Neural Rep., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 13-23, Jan. 2013.
8. D. G. Liebermann, S. Berman, P. L. Weiss, and M. F. Levin, "Kinematics of reaching movements in a 2D virtual environment in adults with and without stroke," IEEE Trans. Neur. Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 778-787, Nov. 2012.
9. T. Merdler, D. G. Liebermann, M. F. Levin, and S. Berman, "Armplane representation of shoulder compensation during pointing movements in subjects with stroke," J. Electromyo. Kinesiol., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 938-947, Aug. 2013.
10. S. Subramanian, L. A. Knaut, C. Beaudoin, B. J. McFadyen, A. G. Feldman, and M. F. Levin, "Virtual reality environments for post-stroke arm rehabilitation," J. NeuroEng Rehabil., vol. 4, p. 10, Jun. 2007.
11. L. Knaut, S. Subramanian, B. J. McFadyen, D. Bourbonnais, and M. F. Levin, "Kinematics of pointing movements made in a virtual versus a physical 3-dimentional environment in healthy and stroke subjects," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 793-802, May 2009.
12. E. C. Magdalon, S. M. Michaelsen, A. A. F. Quevedo, and M. F. Levin, "Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment," Acta. Psychol. (Amst)., vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 126-134, Sep. 2011.
13. E. C. Magdalon, M. F. Levin, A. A. F. Quevedo, and S. M. Michaelsen, "Kinematics of reaching and grasping in a 3D immersive virtual reality environment in patients with hemiparesis," in Proc. 5th World Conf. NeuroRehabilitation, 2008, vol. 22, no. 5, Brazil.
14. A. R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jaasko, I. Leyman, S. Olsson, and S. Steglind, "The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance," Scand. J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 13-31, Jan. 1975.
15. J. Bell-Krotoski and E. Tomancik, "The repeatability of testing with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments," J. Hand. Surg., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 155-161, Jan. 1987.
16. M. F. Levin, J. Desrosiers, D. Beauchemin, N. Bergeron, and A. Rochette, "Development and validation of a scale for rating motor compensations used for reaching in patients with hemiparesis: The reaching performance scale," Phys. Ther., vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 8-22, Jan. 2004.
17. D. M. Morris, G. Uswatte, J. E. Crago, E. W. Cook, and E. Taub, "The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke," Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 750-755, Jun. 2001.
18. S. L. Wolf, P. A. Catlin, M. Ellis, A. L. Archer, B. Morgan, and A. Piacentino, "Assessing Wolf Motor function Test as an outcome measure for research in patients after stroke," Stroke, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1635-1639, Jul. 2001.
19. N. Hamm and D. Curtis, "Normative data for the Purdue Pegboard on sample of adult candidates for vocational rehabilitation," Percept. Mot. Skills, vol. 50, pp. 309-310, 1980.
20. J. E. Cutting and P. M. Vishton, "Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth," in Perception of Space and Motion, W. Epstein and S. Rogers, Eds. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic, 1995, pp. 69-117.
21. M. Mon-Williams and G. P. Bingham, "Ontological issues in distance perception: Cue use under full cue conditions cannot be inferred from use under controlled conditions," Percept. Psychophys., vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 551-561, Apr. 2008.
22. L. Ada, C. G. Canning, J. H. Carr, S. L. Kilbreath, and R. B. Shepherd, "Task-specific training of reaching and manipulation," in Insights into the Reach to Grasp Movement, G. E. Stelmach and P. A. Vroon, Eds. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, Elsevier Science, 1994, pp. 239-265.
23. P. Archambault, P. Pigeon, A. G. Feldman, and M. F. Levin, "Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects," Exp. Brain. Res., vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 55-67, May 1999.
24. A. Viau, A. G. Feldman, B. J. McFadyen, and M. F. Levin, "Reaching in reality and virtual reality: A comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 1, no. 11, p. 10, Dec. 2004.
25. K. I. Ustinova, J. Perkins, L. Szostakowski, L. S. Tamkei, and W. A. Leonard, "Effect of viewing angle on arm reaching while standing in a virtual environment," Acta. Psych., vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 180-190, Feb. 2010.
26. C. Armbruster, M. Wolter, T. Kuhlen, W. Spijkers, and B. Fimm, "Depth perception in virtual reality: Distance estimations in peri- and extrapersonal space," Cyberpsychol. Behav., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9-15, Feb. 2008.
27. P. B. Hibbard and M. F. Bradshaw, "Reaching for virtual objects: Binocular disparity and the control of prehension," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 196-201, Jan. 2003.
28. A. Naceri, R. Chellali, F. Dionnet, and S. Toma, "Depth perception within virtual environments: A comparative study between wide screen stereoscopic displays and head mounted devices," in Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Advanced Cognitive Technologies Applications (Cognitive 2009), Athens, Greece, 2009, pp. 460-466.
29. C. Gonzales-Alvaraz, A. Subramanian, and S. Pardhan, "Reaching and grasping with restricted peripheral vision," Opthal. Physiol. Optics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 265-275, May 2007.
30. S. K. Subramanian and M. F. Levin, "Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 8, no. 36, p. 9, Jun. 2011.
31. G. P. Bingham, R. Coats, and M. Mon-Williams, "Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed," Neurophyschologia, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 288-294, Jan. 2007.
32. T. Schenk, B. Mair, and J. Zihl, "The use of visual feedback and on-line target information in catching and grasping," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 85-96, Jan. 2004.
33. J. B. J. Smeets and E. Brenner, "A new view on grasping," Motor Control, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 237-271, Jul. 1999.
34. F. E. Pollick, "Virtual surfaces and the influence cues to surface shape on grasp," Virtual Reality, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85-101, 1998.
35. G. Tholey, J. P. Desai, and A. E. Castellanos, "Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery," Ann. Surg., vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 102-109, Jan. 2005.
36. A. S. Merians, G. G. Fluet, Q. Qiu, I. Lafond, and S. V. Adamovich, "Learning in a virtual environment using haptic systems for movement re-education: Can this medium be used for remodeling other behaviors and actions?," J. Diabetes Sci. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 301-308, Mar. 2011.
37. M. A. Zahariev and C. L. MacKenzie, "Grasping at 'hin air': Multimodal contact cues for reaching and grasping," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 180, no. 1, pp. 69-84, Jun. 2007.
38. G. P. Bingham, R. Coats, and M. Mon-Williams, "Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed," Neurophyschologia, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 288-294, Jan. 2007.
39. R. H. Cuijpers, E. Brenner, and J. B. J. Smeets, "Consistent haptic feedback is required but it is not enough for natural reaching to virtual cylinders," Hum. Mov. Sci., vol. 27, no. 6, p. 857, Dec. 2008.
40. A. D. Milner and M. A. Goodale, "Two visual systems re-viewed," Neuropsychologia, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 774-785, Feb. 2008.
41. T. W. James, J. Culham, G. K. Humphrey, A. D. Milner, and M. A. Goodale, "Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: A fMRI study," Brain, vol. 126, no. 11, pp. 2463-2475, Nov. 2003.
42. D. G. Lawrence and H. G. Kuypers, "The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. II. The effects of lesions of the descending brain-stem pathways," Brain, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 15-36, Mar. 1968.
43. R. Wenzelburger, F. Kpper, A. Frenzel, H. Stolze, S. Klebe, A. Brossman, J. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, M. Gölge, M. Illert, and G. Deuschl, "Hand coordination following capsular stroke," Brain, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 64-74, Jan. 2005.
44. M. H. Milot, S. J. Spencer, V. Chan, J. P. Allington, J. Klein, C. Chou, J. E. Bobrow, S. C. Cramer, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "A crossover pilot study evaluating the functional outcomes of two different types of robotic movement training in chronic stroke survivors using the arm exoskeleton BONES," J. Neuroengin. Rehabil., vol. 10, p. 112, Dec. 2013.