Robots integrated with virtual reality simulations for customized motor training in a person with upper extremity hemiparesis: A case study

Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 79-86

  Fluet, Gerard G ^a   Merians, Alma S ^a   Qiu, Qinyin ^b   Lafond, Ian ^b   Saleh, Soha ^b   Ruano, Viviana ^c   Delmonico, Andrea R ^d   Adamovich, Sergei V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^b NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Ruano Therapy Associates   (United States)

^d Abilities Therapy Network   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PARESIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; ROBOTICS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE; EXERCISE THERAPY; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PARESIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84861438551     PISSN: 15570576     EISSN: 15570584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3182566f3f     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Wolf SL, Blanton S, Baer H, Breshears J, Butler AJ. Repetitive task practice: a critical review of constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke. Neurologist. 2002; 8 (6): 325-338. (Pubitemid 35365220)
2. Birkenmeier RL, Prager EM, Lang CE. Translating animal doses of taskspecific training to people with chronic stroke in 1-hour therapy sessions: a proof-of-concept study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010: 34 (7): 620-635.
3. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006; 28 (13/14): 823-830.
4. Henderson A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007; 14 (2): 52-61. (Pubitemid 46651524)
5. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Mathai A, Qiu Q, Lewis J, Merians AS. Design of a complex virtual reality simulation to train finger motion for persons with hemiparesis: a proof of concept study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009; 6: 28.
6. Merians AS, Fluet GG, Qiu Q, et al. Robotically facilitated virtual rehabilitation of arm transport integrated with finger movement in persons with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011; 8: 27.
7. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008; 22 (2): 111-121 (Pubitemid 351287594)
8. Patton JL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004; 51 (4): 636-646. (Pubitemid 38375139)
9. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997; 54 (4): 443-446. (Pubitemid 27172864)
10. Johnson MJ, Feng X, Johnson LM, Winters JM. Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, homebased, stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007; 4: 6.
11. Cameirao MS, Badia SB, Oller ED, Verschure PF. Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based Rehabilitation Gaming System: methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009; 7: 48.
12. Lehrer N, Chen Y, Duff M, Wolf SL, Rikakis T. Exploring the bases for a mixed reality stroke rehabilitation system, part II: design of interactive feedback for upper limb rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011; 8: 54.
13. MeriansA, Fluet GG, QiuQ, Saleh S, Lafond I, Adamovich SV. Integrated arm and hand training using robotics and virtual reality simulations. Paper presented at: 8th Annual International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality andAssociated Technologies; August 31-September 2, 2010; Vina del Mar/Valaparaiso, Chile.
14. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth Scale of Muscle Spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987; 67 (2): 206-207. (Pubitemid 17026064)
15. Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, et al. Arm and hand skills: training preferences after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31 (16): 1344-1352.
16. Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Merians AS, Mathai A, Qiu Q. Incorporating haptic effects into three-dimensional virtual environments to train the hemiparetic upper extremity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009; 17 (5): 512-520.
17. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7 (1): 13-31.
18. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983; 63 (10): 1606-1610. (Pubitemid 13010969)
19. Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Hening W, Tunik E, Sage J, Poizner H. Hand preshaping in Parkinson's disease: effects of visual feedback and medication state. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 168 (1/2): 186-202. (Pubitemid 41752824)
20. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Morris DM, et al. The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005; 19 (3): 194-205. (Pubitemid 41216295)
21. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969; 50 (6): 311-319.
22. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K. Adult norms for the 9 hole peg test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985; 39 (6): 386-391.
23. Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, Cook EW III, Taub E. The reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82 (6): 750-755. (Pubitemid 32520783)
24. Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009; 33 (2): 96-103.
25. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987; 50 (6): 714-719. (Pubitemid 17076283)
26. Katz-Leurer M, Fisher I, Neeb M, Schwartz I, Carmeli E. Reliability and validity of the Modified Functional Reach Test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31 (3): 243-248.
27. Lang CE,Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW. Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007; 31 (2): 56-63.
28. Fan J, He J, Tillery SI. Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp. Exp Brain Res. 2006; 171 (3): 283-296. (Pubitemid 43780102)
29. Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86 (7): 1498-1501. (Pubitemid 40909927)
30. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999; 30 (10): 2131-2140. (Pubitemid 29473260)
31. Lin KC, Hsieh YW,Wu CY, Chen CL, Jang Y, Liu JS.Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of theWolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23 (5): 429-434.
32. Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimatingminimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89 (9): 1693-1700.
33. Magill RA. Motor Learning and Control. 8th ed. NewYork: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
34. Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006; 19 (1): 84-90. (Pubitemid 43172710)