Reaching in reality and virtual reality: A comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 1, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Viau, Antonin ^a,b   Feldman, Anatol G ^a,b   McFadyen, Bradford J ^c   Levin, Mindy F ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 15444376842     PISSN: 17430003     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-1-11     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Stanton D, Foreman N, Wilson P: Uses of virtual reality in clinical training: developing the spatial skills of children with mobility impairments. In In Virtual Environments in Clinical Psychology and Neuroscience: Methods and Techniques in Advanced Patient-Therapist Interaction Edited by: Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Molinari E. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1998:219-232.
2. Deutsch JE, Merians AS, Burdea GC, Boian R, Adamovich SV, Poizner H: Haptics and virtual reality used to increase strength and improve function in chronic individuals post-stroke: two case reports. Neurol Rep 2002, 26:72-86.
3. Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, Recce M, Poizner H: Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther 2002, 82:898-915.
4. Sveistrup H, McComas J, Thornton M, Marshall S, Finestone H, McCormick A, Babulic K, Mayhew A: Environmental studies of virtual reality-delivered compared to conventional exercise programs for rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003, 6:245-249.
5. Holden MK, Dyar T: Virtual environment training: a new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurol Rep 2002, 26:62-71.
6. Piron L, Tonin P, Atzori A, Trivello E, Dam M: A virtual-reality based motor tele-rehabilitation system [abstract]. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Virtual Rehab 2003:21-26.
7. Riva G, Gamberini L: Virtual reality in telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2000, 6:327-340.
8. Rizzo A: A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual rehabilitation [abstract]. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Virtual Rehab 2003:1-2.
9. Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH: Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995, 130:59-68.
10. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC: Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomized trial. Lancet 1999, 354:191-196.
11. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW: Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996, 75:2144-2149.
12. Wu C, Wong M, Lin K, Chen H: Effects of task goal and personal preference on seated reaching kinematics after stroke. Stroke 2001, 32:70-76.
13. Kizony R, Raz L, Katz N, Weingarden H, Weiss PL: Using a video projected VR system for patients with spinal cord injury [abstract]. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Virtual Rehab 2003:82-88.
14. Todorov E, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E: Augmented feedback presented in a virtual environment accelerates learning of a difficult motor task. J Motor Behav 1997, 29:147-158.
15. Cirstea M, Levin MF: Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain 2000, 123:940-953.
16. Levin MF: Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 1996, 119:281-293.
17. Michaelsen SM, Levin MF: Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke: a controlled trial. Stroke 2004, 35:1914-1919.
18. Viau A, Levin MF, McFadyen BJ, Feldman AG: Reaching in reality and in virtual reality: A comparison of movement kinematics [abstract]. ISEK, Boston 2004.
19. Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, Van Hullenaar S, Sanford J, Barreca S, Vanspall B, Plews N: Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Stroke 1983, 24:58-63.
20. Archambault P, Pigeon P, Feldman AG, Levin MF: Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Exp Brain Res 1999, 126:55-67.
21. Cumming BG, DeAngelis GC: The physiology of stereopsis. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001, 24:203-238.
22. Bradshaw MF, Elliott KM: The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension. Spatial Vision 2003, 16:295-309.
23. Seidler R, Stelmach GE: Trunk-assisted prehension: specification of body segments with imposed temporal constraints. J Mot Behav 2000, 32:379-388.
24. Bioan RF, Kourtev H, Deutsch JE, Lewis JA, Burdea GC: Dual stewart-platform gait rehabilitation system for individuals poststroke [abstract]. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Virtual Rehab 2003:93.
25. Comeau F, Chapdelaine S, McFayden BJ, Malouin F, Lamontagne A, Galiana L, Laurendeau D, Richards CL, Fung J: Development of increasingly complex virtual environments for locomotor training after stroke [abstract]. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Virtual Rehab 2003:90.