Upgraded model of primary gushing: From nanobubble formation until liquid expulsion

Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists

Volumn 73, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 343-346

  Khalesi, Mohammadreza ^a   Deckers, Sylvie ^b   Riveros Galan, David ^a   Gebruers, Kurt ^a   Derdelinckx, Guy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Brasserie d'Orval ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

CO2; Gushing; Hydrophobin; Modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946726891     PISSN: 03610470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-2015-0929-01     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Buxaderas, S., and Lopez-Tamames, E. Sparkling wines: Features and trends from tradition. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 66:1-45, 2012.
2. Christian, M., Ilberg, V., Aydin, A. A., Titze, J., Friess, A., Jacob, F., and Parlar, H. New gushing mechanism proposed by applying particle size analysis and several surfactants. Brew. Sci. 62:100-107, 2009.
3. Christian, M., Titze, J., Ilberg, V., and Jacob, F. Combined particle analysis as a new tool to predict gushing shown with alcohol-free beverage products. Brew. Sci. 63:72-79, 2010.
4. Christian, M., Titze, J., Ilberg, V., and Jacob, F. Novel perspectives in gushing analysis: A review. J. Inst. Brew. 117(3):295-313, 2011.
5. 2-hydrophobin structures acting as nanobombs in beer. Brew. Sci. 63:54-61, 2010.
6. 2-hydrophobin structures and study the primary gushing potential of beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 69(3):144-149, 2011.
7. 2 interaction with class II hydro-phobins: New insight into the mechanism underpinning primary gushing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 70(4):249-256, 2012.
8. Fischer, S. Blasenbildung von in flüssigkeiten gelösten Gasen. Dissertation. TU Munich, Germany, 2001.
9. Gardner, R. J. The mechanism of gushing-A review. J. Inst. Brew. 79:275-283, 1973.
10. Haikara, A., Sarlin, T., Nakari-Setälä, T., and Penttilä, M. Method for determining a gushing factor for a beverage. Patent EP 1071949, 2004.
11. Helm, E., and Richardt, O. C. Das ueberschäumen (wildwerden) des Bieres. Wochenschr. Brau. 55(12):89-94, 1938.
12. Hippeli, S., and Elstner, E. F. Are hydrophobins and/or non-specific lipid transfer proteins responsible for gushing in beer? New hypotheses on the chemical nature of gushing inducing factors. Z. Natur-forsch. C 1-8, 2002.
13. Khalesi, M., Mandelings, N., Shokribousjein, Z., Riveros-Galan, D., Verachtert, H., Gebruers, K., Delvigne, F., Vankelecom, I., and Derdelinckx, G. Biophysical characterisation of hydrophobin enriched foamate. Cerevisia 38:129-134, 2014.
14. 2 foam frac-tionation system. Ind. Crop. Prod. 43:372-377, 2013.
15. Linder, M. B. Hydrophobins: Proteins that self assemble at interfaces. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 14:356-363, 2009.
16. Lutterschmid, G., Stübner, M., Vogel, R. F., and Niessen, L. Induction of gushing with recombinant class II hydrophobin FcHyd5p from Fusarium culmorum and the impact of hop compounds on its gushing potential. J. Inst. Brew. 116(4):339-347, 2010.
17. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J., Casado-Chacón, A., and Fuster, D. Physics of beer tapping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113:214501, 2014.
18. Sarlin, T., Nakari-Setälä, T., Linder, M., Penttilä, M., and Haikara, A. Fungal hydrophobins as predictors of the gushing activity of malt. J. Inst. Brew. 111(2):105-111, 2005.
19. Shokribousjein, Z. Interaction of Class II Hydrophobins with Hydro-phobic Interfaces as a Basis for Solving Primary Gushing Problems in the Brewing Industry. Dissertation. KULeuven, Belgium, 2014.
20. Stanimirova, R. D., Gurkov, T. D., Kralchevsky, P. A., Balashev, K. T., Stoyanov, S. D., and Pelan, E. G. Surface pressure and elasticity of hy-drophobin HFBII layers on the air-water interface: Rheology versus structure detected by AFM imaging. Langmuir 29:6053-6067, 2013.