Targeting of SUMO substrates to a Cdc48-Ufd1-Npl4 segregase and STUbL pathway in fission yeast

Nature Communications

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Køhler, Julie Bonne ^a   Tammsalu, Triin ^b   Jørgensen, Maria Mønster ^a   Steen, Nana ^a   Hay, Ronald Thomas ^b   Thon, Geneviève ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; LYSINE; SUMO PROTEIN; SUMO TARGETED UBIQUITIN LIGASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; CARRIER PROTEIN; CDC48 PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; MANNOSYLTRANSFERASE; NPL4 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NPL4 PROTEIN, S POMBE; NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRANSPORT PROTEIN; PMT3 PROTEIN, S POMBE; PROTEIN O-MANNOSYLTRANSFERASE; REPRESSOR PROTEIN; RFP1 PROTEIN, S POMBE; RFP2 PROTEIN, S POMBE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEIN; SLX5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SLX8 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SLX8 PROTEIN, S POMBE; SUMO 1 PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; UFD1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; UFD1 PROTEIN, S POMBE; VESICULAR TRANSPORT PROTEIN;

CHROMOSOME; GENE EXPRESSION; MUTATION; PROTEIN; PROTEOMICS; YEAST;

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; GENE ONTOLOGY; MAMMAL CELL; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SUMOYLATION; TELOMERE; METABOLISM; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES;

EUKARYOTA; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCETACEAE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CENTROMERE; MANNOSYLTRANSFERASES; NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRANSPORT PROTEINS; REPRESSOR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; SUMOYLATION; TELOMERE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE COMPLEXES; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; VESICULAR TRANSPORT PROTEINS;

EID: 84946592741     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20411723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9827     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Flotho, A. & Melchior, F. Sumoylation: a regulatory protein modification in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 357-385 (2013).
2. Skilton, A., Ho, J. C., Mercer, B., Outwin, E. & Watts, F. Z. SUMO chain formation is required for response to replication arrest in S. pombe. PLoS ONE 4, e6750 (2009).
3. Watts, F. Z. et al. The role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe SUMO ligases in genome stability. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35, 1379-1384 (2007).
4. Uzunova, K. et al. Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 34167-34175 (2007).
5. Prudden, J. et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J. 26, 4089-4101 (2007).
6. Sun, H., Leverson, J. D. & Hunter, T. Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins. EMBO J. 26, 4102-4112 (2007).
7. Kosoy, A., Calonge, T. M., Outwin, E. A. & O'Connell, M. J. Fission yeast Rnf4 homologs are required for DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 20388-20394 (2007).
8. Tatham, M. H. et al. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 538-546 (2008).
9. Rojas-Fernandez, A. et al. SUMO chain-induced dimerization activates RNF4. Mol. Cell 53, 880-892 (2014).
10. Yin, Y. et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 26, 1196-1208 (2012).
11. Lallemand-Breitenbach, V. et al. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 547-555 (2008).
12. Wang, Z. & Prelich, G. Quality control of a transcriptional regulator by SUMO-targeted degradation. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 1694-1706 (2009).
13. Mukhopadhyay, D., Arnaoutov, A. & Dasso, M. The SUMO protease SENP6 is essential for inner kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 188, 681-692 (2010).
14. Galanty, Y., Belotserkovskaya, R., Coates, J. & Jackson, S. P. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 26, 1179-1195 (2012).
15. D'Ambrosio, L. M. & Lavoie, B. D. Pds5 prevents the PolySUMO-dependent separation of sister chromatids. Curr. Biol. 24, 361-371 (2014).
16. Westerbeck, J. W. et al. A SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase is involved in the degradation of the nuclear pool of the SUMO E3 ligase Siz1. Mol. Biol. Cell 25, 1-16 (2014).
17. van de Pasch, L. A. et al. Centromere binding and a conserved role in chromosome stability for SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligases. PLoS ONE 8, e65628 (2013).
18. Garza, R. & Pillus, L. STUbLs in chromatin and genome stability. Biopolymers 99, 146-154 (2013).
19. Kohler, J. B., Jorgensen, M. L., Beinoraite, G., Thorsen, M. & Thon, G. Concerted action of the ubiquitin-fusion degradation protein 1 (Ufd1) and Sumo-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) in the DNA-damage response. PLoS ONE 8, e80442 (2013).
20. Nie, M. et al. Dual recruitment of Cdc48 (p97)-Ufd1-Npl4 ubiquitin-selective segregase by small ubiquitin-like modifier protein (SUMO) and ubiquitin in SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase-mediated genome stability functions. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 29610-29619 (2012).
21. Bergink, S. et al. Role of Cdc48/p97 as a SUMO-targeted segregase curbing Rad51-Rad52 interaction. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 526-532 (2013).
22. Meyer, H., Bug, M. & Bremer, S. Emerging functions of the VCP/p97 AAA-ATPase in the ubiquitin system. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 117-123 (2012).
23. Baek, G. H. et al. Cdc48: a swiss army knife of cell biology. J. Amino Acids 2013, 183421 (2013).
24. Wohlschlegel, J. A., Johnson, E. S., Reed, S. I. & Yates, 3rd J. R. Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45662-45668 (2004).
25. Hannich, J. T. et al. Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 4102-4110 (2005).
26. Golebiowski, F. et al. System-wide changes to SUMO modifications in response to heat shock. Sci. Signal. 2, ra24 (2009).
27. Matic, I. et al. Site-specific identification of SUMO-2 targets in cells reveals an inverted SUMOylation motif and a hydrophobic cluster SUMOylation motif. Mol. Cell 39, 641-652 (2010).
28. Tatham, M. H., Matic, I., Mann, M. & Hay, R. T. Comparative proteomic analysis identifies a role for SUMO in protein quality control. Sci. Signal. 4, rs4 (2011).
29. Tammsalu, T. et al. Proteome-wide identification of SUMO2 modification sites. Sci. Signal. 7, rs2 (2014).
30. Hendriks, I. A. et al. Uncovering global SUMOylation signaling networks in a site-specific manner. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 927-936 (2014).
31. Impens, F., Radoshevich, L., Cossart, P. & Ribet, D. Mapping of SUMO sites and analysis of SUMOylation changes induced by external stimuli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12432-12437 (2014).
32. Wohlschlegel, J. A., Johnson, E. S., Reed, S. I. & Yates, 3rd J. R. Improved identification of SUMO attachment sites using C-terminal SUMO mutants and tailored protease digestion strategies. J. Proteome Res. 5, 761-770 (2006).
33. Mann, M. Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 952-958 (2006).
34. Xu, G., Paige, J. S. & Jaffrey, S. R. Global analysis of lysine ubiquitination by ubiquitin remnant immunoaffinity profiling. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 868-873 (2010).
35. Marguerat, S. et al. Quantitative analysis of fission yeast transcriptomes and proteomes in proliferating and quiescent cells. Cell 151, 671-683 (2012).
36. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367-1372 (2008).
37. Rodriguez, M. S., Dargemont, C. & Hay, R. T. SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12654-12659 (2001).
38. Kawashima, S. A., Yamagishi, Y., Honda, T., Ishiguro, K. & Watanabe, Y. Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science 327, 172-177 (2010).
39. Schmidt, B. H., Osheroff, N. & Berger, J. M. Structure of a topoisomerase IIDNA-nucleotide complex reveals a new control mechanism for ATPase activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1147-1154 (2012).
40. Bachant, J., Alcasabas, A., Blat, Y., Kleckner, N. & Elledge, S. J. The SUMO-1 isopeptidase Smt4 is linked to centromeric cohesion through SUMO-1 modification of DNA topoisomerase II. Mol. Cell 9, 1169-1182 (2002).
41. Tanaka, K. et al. Characterization of a fission yeast SUMO-1 homologue, pmt3p, required for multiple nuclear events, including the control of telomere length and chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 8660-8672 (1999).
42. Psakhye, I. & Jentsch, S. Protein group modification and synergy in the SUMO pathway as exemplified in DNA repair. Cell 151, 807-820 (2012).
43. Wood, V. et al. PomBase: a comprehensive online resource for fission yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D695-D699 (2012).
44. Denison, C. et al. A proteomic strategy for gaining insights into protein sumoylation in yeast. Mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 246-254 (2005).
45. Albuquerque, C. P. et al. Distinct SUMO ligases cooperate with Esc2 and Slx5 to suppress duplication-mediated genome rearrangements. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003670 (2013).
46. Panse, V. G., Hardeland, U., Werner, T., Kuster, B. & Hurt, E. A proteome-wide approach identifies sumoylated substrate proteins in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 41346-41351 (2004).
47. Balakrishnan, R. et al. YeastMine-an integrated data warehouse for Saccharomyces cerevisiae data as a multipurpose tool-kit. Database (Oxford) 2012, bar062 (2012).
48. Shiroiwa, Y. et al. Mis17 is a regulatory module of the Mis6-Mal2-Sim4 centromere complex that is required for the recruitment of CenH3/CENP-A in fission yeast. PLoS ONE 6, e17761 (2011).
49. Liu, X., McLeod, I., Anderson, S., Yates, 3rd J. R. & He, X. Molecular analysis of kinetochore architecture in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24, 2919-2930 (2005).
50. Sanchez-Perez, I. et al. The DASH complex and Klp5/Klp6 kinesin coordinate bipolar chromosome attachment in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24, 2931-2943 (2005).
51. Lescasse, R., Pobiega, S., Callebaut, I. & Marcand, S. End-joining inhibition at telomeres requires the translocase and polySUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase Uls1. EMBO J. 32, 805-815 (2013).
52. Chikashige, Y. et al. Membrane proteins Bqt3 and -4 anchor telomeres to the nuclear envelope to ensure chromosomal bouquet formation. J. Cell Biol. 187, 413-427 (2009).
53. Fujita, I. et al. Telomere-nuclear envelope dissociation promoted by Rap1 phosphorylation ensures faithful chromosome segregation. Curr. Biol. 22, 1932-1937 (2012).
54. Gonzalez, Y., Saito, A. & Sazer, S. Fission yeast Lem2 and Man1 perform fundamental functions of the animal cell nuclear lamina. Nucleus 3, 60-76 (2012).
55. Taddei, A. & Gasser, S. M. Structure and function in the budding yeast nucleus. Genetics 192, 107-129 (2012).
56. Ferreira, H. C., Towbin, B. D., Jegou, T. & Gasser, S. M. The shelterin protein POT-1 anchors Caenorhabditis elegans telomeres through SUN-1 at the nuclear periphery. J. Cell Biol. 203, 727-735 (2013).
57. Srikumar, T., Lewicki, M. C. & Raught, B. A global S. cerevisiae small ubiquitinrelated modifier (SUMO) system interactome. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 668 (2013).
58. Srikumar, T. et al. Global analysis of SUMO chain function reveals multiple roles in chromatin regulation. J. Cell Biol. 201, 145-163 (2013).
59. Darst, R. P., Garcia, S. N., Koch, M. R. & Pillus, L. Slx5 promotes transcriptional silencing and is required for robust growth in the absence of Sir2. Mol. Cell Biol. 28, 1361-1372 (2008).
60. McAleenan, A. et al. SUMOylation of the alpha-kleisin subunit of cohesin is required for DNA damage-induced cohesion. Curr. Biol. 22, 1564-1575 (2012).
61. Hay, R. T. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol. Cell 18, 1-12 (2005).
62. Miyagawa, K. et al. SUMOylation regulates telomere length by targeting the shelterin subunit Tpz1(Tpp1) to modulate shelterin-Stn1 interaction in fission yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5950-5955 (2014).
63. Garg, M. et al. Tpz1TPP1 SUMOylation reveals evolutionary conservation of SUMO-dependent Stn1 telomere association. EMBO Rep. 15, 871-877 (2014).
64. Gao, J. et al. Rapid, efficient and precise allele replacement in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr. Genet. 60, 109-119 (2014).
65. Tammsalu, T. et al. Proteome-wide identification of SUMO modification sites by mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1374-1388 (2015).
66. Wisniewski, J. R., Zougman, A. & Mann, M. Combination of FASP and StageTip-based fractionation allows in-depth analysis of the hippocampal membrane proteome. J. Proteome Res. 8, 5674-5678 (2009).
67. Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. & Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1896-1906 (2007).
68. Cox, J. et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol. Cell Proteomics 13, 2513-2526 (2014).
69. O'Shea, J. P. et al. pLogo: a probabilistic approach to visualizing sequence motifs. Nat. Methods 10, 1211-1212 (2013).
70. Jones, D. T. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 195-202 (1999).