Concerted action of the ubiquitin-fusion degradation protein 1 (Ufd1) and sumo-targeted ubiquitin ligases (STUbLs) in the DNA-damage response

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Køhler, Julie Bonne ^a   Jørgensen, Maria Louise Mønster ^a   Beinoraité, Gabriele ^a   Thorsen, Michael ^a   Thon, Geneviève ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING PROTEIN; NUCLEIC ACID BINDING PROTEIN; PLI1 PROTEIN; RAD22 PROTEIN; RFP1 PROTEIN; RHP18 PROTEIN; RHP51 PROTEIN; RQH1 PROTEIN; SUMO TARGETED UBIQUITIN LIGASE; UBIQUITIN FUSION DEGRADATION PROTEIN 1; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL MUTANT; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; EPISTASIS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA DAMAGE; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; VESICULAR TRANSPORT PROTEINS;

EID: 84892959701     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080442     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Gareau JR, Lima CD (2010) The SUMO pathway: emerging mechanisms that shape specificity, conjugation and recognition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 861-871. doi:10.1038/nrm3011. PubMed: 21102611.
2. Wilkinson KA, Henley JM (2010) Mechanisms, regulation and consequences of protein SUMOylation. Biochem J 428: 133-145. doi:10.1042/BJ20100158. PubMed: 20462400.
3. Hochstrasser M (2009) Origin and function of ubiquitin-like proteins. Nature 458: 422-429. doi:10.1038/nature07958. PubMed: 19325621.
4. Xhemalce B, Seeler JS, Thon G, Dejean A, Arcangioli B (2004) Role of the fission yeast SUMO E3 ligase Pli1p in centromere and telomere maintenance. EMBO J 23: 3844-3853. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600394. PubMed: 15359282. (Pubitemid 39389715)
5. Andrews EA, Palecek J, Sergeant J, Taylor E, Lehmann AR et al. (2005) Nse2, a component of the Smc5-6 complex, is a SUMO ligase required for the response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 25: 185-196. doi:10.1128/MCB.25.1.185-196. 2005. PubMed: 15601841. (Pubitemid 40039810)
6. Watts FZ, Skilton A, Ho JC, Boyd LK, Trickey MA et al. (2007) The role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe SUMO ligases in genome stability. Biochem Soc Trans 35: 1379-1384. doi:10.1042/BST0351379. PubMed: 18031226.
7. Ho JC, Warr NJ, Shimizu H, Watts FZ (2001) SUMO modification of Rad22, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of the recombination protein Rad52. Nucleic Acids Res 29: 4179-4186. doi:10.1093/nar/29.20.4179. PubMed: 11600706. (Pubitemid 33019561)
8. Sacher M, Pfander B, Hoege C, Jentsch S (2006) Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1284-1290. doi:10.1038/ncb1488. PubMed: 17013376. (Pubitemid 44660594)
9. Burgess RC, Rahman S, Lisby M, Rothstein R, Zhao X (2007) The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6153-6162. doi:10.1128/MCB.00787-07. PubMed: 17591698. (Pubitemid 47326702)
10. Ohuchi T, Seki M, Kugou K, Tada S, Ohta K et al. (2009) Accumulation of sumoylated Rad52 in checkpoint mutants perturbed in DNA replication. DNA Repair (Amst) 8: 690-696. doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.01.018. PubMed: 19261547.
11. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao X, Maeda D et al. (2006) Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509-522. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.050. PubMed: 17081974. (Pubitemid 44647424)
12. Morris JR, Boutell C, Keppler M, Densham R, Weekes D et al. (2009) The SUMO modification pathway is involved in the BRCA1 response to genotoxic stress. Nature 462: 886-890. doi:10.1038/nature08593. PubMed: 20016594.
13. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Polo S, Miller KM et al. (2009) Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 462: 935-939. doi:10.1038/nature08657. PubMed: 20016603.
14. Dou H, Huang C, Singh M, Carpenter PB, Yeh ET (2010) Regulation of DNA repair through deSUMOylation and SUMOylation of replication protein A complex. Mol Cell 39: 333-345. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.07.021. PubMed: 20705237.
15. Cremona CA, Sarangi P, Yang Y, Hang LE, Rahman S et al. (2012) Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol Cell 45: 422-432. doi:10.1016/j.molcel. 2011.11.028. PubMed: 22285753.
16. Psakhye I, Jentsch S (2012) Protein group modification and synergy in the SUMO pathway as exemplified in DNA repair. Cell 151: 807-820. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.021. PubMed: 23122649.
17. Hardeland U, Steinacher R, Jiricny J, Schär P (2002) Modification of the human thymine-DNA glycosylase by ubiquitin-like proteins facilitates enzymatic turnover. EMBO J 21: 1456-1464. doi:10.1093/emboj/21.6.1456. PubMed: 11889051. (Pubitemid 34246524)
18. Mailand N, Bekker-Jensen S, Faustrup H, Melander F, Bartek J et al. (2007) RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 131: 887-900. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.040. PubMed: 18001824. (Pubitemid 350138084)
19. Ulrich HD (2012) Ubiquitin and SUMO in DNA repair at a glance. J Cell Sci 125: 249-254. doi:10.1242/jcs.091801. PubMed: 22357966.
20. Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N (2011) The ubiquitin- and SUMO-dependent signaling response to DNA double-strand breaks. FEBS Lett 585: 2914-2919. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.056. PubMed: 21664912.
21. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141. doi:10.1038/nature00991. PubMed: 12226657. (Pubitemid 35025438)
22. Stelter P, Ulrich HD (2003) Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425: 188-191. doi:10.1038/nature01965. PubMed: 12968183. (Pubitemid 37150898)
23. Frampton J, Irmisch A, Green CM, Neiss A, Trickey M et al. (2006) Postreplication repair and PCNA modification in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Cell Biol 17: 2976-2985. doi:10.1091/mbc.E05-11-1008. PubMed: 16641370. (Pubitemid 43993502)
24. Altmannova V, Eckert-Boulet N, Arneric M, Kolesar P, Chaloupkova R et al. (2010) Rad52 SUMOylation affects the efficiency of the DNA repair. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 4708-4721. doi:10.1093/nar/gkq195. PubMed: 20371517.
25. Danielsen JR, Povlsen LK, Villumsen BH, Streicher W, Nilsson J et al. (2012) DNA damage-inducible SUMOylation of HERC2 promotes RNF8 binding via a novel SUMO-binding Zinc finger. J Cell Biol 197: 179-187. doi:10.1083/jcb. 201106152. PubMed: 22508508.
26. Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G, Slavin DA, Perry JJ et al. (2007) SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 26: 4089-4101. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601838. PubMed: 17762865. (Pubitemid 47462097)
27. Kosoy A, Calonge TM, Outwin EA, O'Connell MJ (2007) Fission yeast Rnf4 homologs are required for DNA repair. J Biol Chem 282: 20388-20394. doi:10.1074/jbc.M702652200. PubMed: 17502373. (Pubitemid 47099981)
28. Sun H, Leverson JD, Hunter T (2007) Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins. EMBO J 26: 4102-4112. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601839. PubMed: 17762864. (Pubitemid 47462098)
29. Uzunova K, Göttsche K, Miteva M, Weisshaar SR, Glanemann C et al. (2007) Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. J Biol Chem 282: 34167-34175. doi:10.1074/jbc.M706505200. PubMed: 17728242. (Pubitemid 350159437)
30. Tatham MH, Geoffroy MC, Shen L, Plechanovova A, Hattersley N et al. (2008) RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat Cell Biol 10: 538-546. doi:10.1038/ncb1716. PubMed: 18408734. (Pubitemid 351627373)
31. Prudden J, Perry JJ, Nie M, Vashisht AA, Arvai AS et al. (2011) DNA repair and global sumoylation are regulated by distinct Ubc9 noncovalent complexes. Mol Cell Biol 31: 2299-2310. doi:10.1128/MCB.05188-11. PubMed: 21444718.
32. Nagai S, Dubrana K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Davidson MB, Roberts TM et al. (2008) Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 322: 597-602. doi:10.1126/science. 1162790. PubMed: 18948542.
33. Cook CE, Hochstrasser M, Kerscher O (2009) The SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase subunit Slx5 resides in nuclear foci and at sites of DNA breaks. Cell Cycle 8: 1080-1089. doi:10.4161/cc.8.7.8123. PubMed: 19270524.
34. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Jackson SP (2012) RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 26: 1179-1195. doi:10.1101/gad.188284.112. PubMed: 22661229.
35. Yin Y, Seifert A, Chua JS, Maure JF, Golebiowski F et al. (2012) SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev 26: 1196-1208. doi:10.1101/gad.189274.112. PubMed: 22661230.
36. Parker JL, Ulrich HD (2012) A SUMO-interacting motif activates budding yeast ubiquitin ligase Rad18 towards SUMO-modified PCNA. Nucleic Acids Res 40: 11380-11388. doi:10.1093/nar/gks892. PubMed: 23034805.
37. Meyer HH, Shorter JG, Seemann J, Pappin D, Warren G (2000) A complex of mammalian ufd1 and npl4 links the AAA-ATPase, p97, to ubiquitin and nuclear transport pathways. EMBO J 19: 2181-2192. doi:10.1093/emboj/19.10.2181. PubMed: 10811609. (Pubitemid 30258999)
38. Meyer H, Bug M, Bremer S (2012) Emerging functions of the VCP/p97 AAA-ATPase in the ubiquitin system. Nat Cell Biol 14: 117-123. doi:10.1038/ncb2407. PubMed: 22298039.
39. Stolz A, Hilt W, Buchberger A, Wolf DH (2011) Cdc48: a power machine in protein degradation. Trends Biochem Sci 36: 515-523. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2011.06. 001. PubMed: 21741246.
40. Ye Y, Meyer HH, Rapoport TA (2003) Function of the p97-Ufd1-Npl4 complex in retrotranslocation from the ER to the cytosol: dual recognition of nonubiquitinated polypeptide segments and polyubiquitin chains. J Cell Biol 162: 71-84. doi:10.1083/jcb.200302169. PubMed: 12847084. (Pubitemid 36859536)
41. Wolf DH, Stolz A (2012) The Cdc48 machine in endoplasmic reticulum associated protein degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1823: 117-124. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.09.002. PubMed: 21945179.
42. Moir D, Stewart SE, Osmond BC, Botstein D (1982) Cold-sensitive cell-division-cycle mutants of yeast: isolation, properties, and pseudoreversion studies. Genetics 100: 547-563. PubMed: 6749598.
43. Alexandru G, Graumann J, Smith GT, Kolawa NJ, Fang R et al. (2008) UBXD7 binds multiple ubiquitin ligases and implicates p97 in HIF1alpha turnover. Cell 134: 804-816. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.048. PubMed: 18775313.
44. Vong QP, Cao K, Li HY, Iglesias PA, Zheng Y (2005) Chromosome alignment and segregation regulated by ubiquitination of survivin. Science 310: 1499-1504. doi:10.1126/science.1120160. PubMed: 16322459. (Pubitemid 41746347)
45. Ramadan K, Bruderer R, Spiga FM, Popp O, Baur T et al. (2007) Cdc48/p97 promotes reformation of the nucleus by extracting the kinase Aurora B from chromatin. Nature 450: 1258-1262. doi:10.1038/nature06388. PubMed: 18097415.
46. Mouysset J, Deichsel A, Moser S, Hoege C, Hyman AA et al. (2008) Cell cycle progression requires the CDC-48UFD-1/NPL-4 complex for efficient DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 12879-12884. doi:10.1073/pnas. 0805944105. PubMed: 18728180.
47. Deichsel A, Mouysset J, Hoppe T (2009) The ubiquitin-selective chaperone CDC-48/p97, a new player in DNA replication. Cell Cycle 8: 185-190. doi:10.4161/cc.8.2.7356. PubMed: 19158489.
48. Raman M, Havens CG, Walter JC, Harper JW (2011) A genome-wide screen identifies p97 as an essential regulator of DNA damage-dependent CDT1 destruction. Mol Cell 44: 72-84. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.06.036. PubMed: 21981919.
49. Franz A, Orth M, Pirson PA, Sonneville R, Blow JJ et al. (2011) CDC-48/p97 coordinates CDT-1 degradation with GINS chromatin dissociation to ensure faithful DNA replication. Mol Cell 44: 85-96. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011. 08.028. PubMed: 21981920.
50. Verma R, Oania R, Fang R, Smith GT, Deshaies RJ (2011) Cdc48/p97 mediates UV-dependent turnover of RNA Pol II. Mol Cell 41: 82-92. doi:10.1016/j.molcel. 2010.12.017. PubMed: 21211725.
51. Meerang M, Ritz D, Paliwal S, Garajova Z, Bosshard M et al. (2011) The ubiquitin-selective segregase VCP/p97 orchestrates the response to DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 13: 1376-1382. doi:10.1038/ncb2367. PubMed: 22020440.
52. Acs K, Luijsterburg MS, Ackermann L, Salomons FA, Hoppe T et al. (2011) The AAA-ATPase VCP/p97 promotes 53BP1 recruitment by removing L3MBTL1 from DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18: 1345-1350. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2188. PubMed: 22120668.
53. Dantuma NP, Hoppe T (2012) Growing sphere of influence: Cdc48/p97 orchestrates ubiquitin-dependent extraction from chromatin. Trends Cell Biol 22: 483-491. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2012.06.003. PubMed: 22818974.
54. Ramadan K (2012) p97/VCP- and Lys48-linked polyubiquitination form a new signaling pathway in DNA damage response. Cell Cycle 11: 1062-1069. doi:10.4161/cc.11.6.19446. PubMed: 22391235.
55. Hetzer M, Meyer HH, Walther TC, Bilbao-Cortes D, Warren G et al. (2001) Distinct AAA-ATPase p97 complexes function in discrete steps of nuclear assembly. Nat Cell Biol 3: 1086-1091. doi:10.1038/ncb1201-1086. PubMed: 11781570. (Pubitemid 33130459)
56. Bruderer RM, Brasseur C, Meyer HH (2004) The AAA ATPase p97/VCP interacts with its alternative co-factors, Ufd1-Npl4 and p47, through a common bipartite binding mechanism. J Biol Chem 279: 49609-49616. doi:10.1074/jbc.M408695200. PubMed: 15371428. (Pubitemid 39577763)
57. Park S, Isaacson R, Kim HT, Silver PA, Wagner G (2005) Ufd1 exhibits the AAA-ATPase fold with two distinct ubiquitin interaction sites. Structure 13: 995-1005. doi:10.1016/j.str.2005.04.013. PubMed: 16004872. (Pubitemid 40943331)
58. Naula N, Hilti N, Schweingruber AM, Schweingruber ME (2003) Cordycepin in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: effects on the wild type and phenotypes of mutants resistant to the drug. Curr Genet 43: 400-406. doi:10.1007/s00294-003-0413-4. PubMed: 12827445. (Pubitemid 37161559)
59. Tanaka K, Nishide J, Okazaki K, Kato H, Niwa O et al. (1999) Characterization of a fission yeast SUMO-1 homologue, pmt3p, required for multiple nuclear events, including the control of telomere length and chromosome segregation. Mol Cell Biol 19: 8660-8672. PubMed: 10567589. (Pubitemid 30414058)
60. Yuasa T, Hayashi T, Ikai N, Katayama T, Aoki K et al. (2004) An interactive gene network for securin-separase, condensin, cohesin, Dis1/Mtc1 and histones constructed by mass transformation. Genes Cells 9: 1069-1082. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2004.00790.x. PubMed: 15507118. (Pubitemid 39467979)
61. Matsuyama A, Arai R, Yashiroda Y, Shirai A, Kamata A et al. (2006) ORFeome cloning and global analysis of protein localization in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nat Biotechnol 24: 841-847. doi:10.1038/nbt1222. PubMed: 16823372. (Pubitemid 44086626)
62. Wan S, Capasso H, Walworth NC (1999) The topoisomerase I poison camptothecin generates a Chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint signal in fission yeast. Yeast 15: 821-828. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199907)15:10A. PubMed: 10407262.
63. Saintigny Y, Delacôte F, Varès G, Petitot F, Lambert S et al. (2001) Characterization of homologous recombination induced by replication inhibition in mammalian cells. EMBO J 20: 3861-3870. doi:10.1093/emboj/20.14. 3861. PubMed: 11447127. (Pubitemid 32694383)
64. Petermann E, Orta ML, Issaeva N, Schultz N, Helleday T (2010) Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol Cell 37: 492-502. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.021. PubMed: 20188668.
65. Kim WJ, Lee S, Park MS, Jang YK, Kim JB et al. (2000) Rad22 protein, a rad52 homologue in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, binds to DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem 275: 35607-35611. doi:10.1074/jbc.M007060200. PubMed: 10956666.
66. Noguchi E, Noguchi C, McDonald WH, Yates JR 3rd, Russell P (2004) Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 8342-8355. doi:10.1128/MCB.24.19.8342-8355.2004. PubMed: 15367656. (Pubitemid 39245057)
67. Meister P, Taddei A, Vernis L, Poidevin M, Gasser SM et al. (2005) Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint. J Cell Biol 168: 537-544. doi:10.1083/jcb.200410006. PubMed: 15716375. (Pubitemid 40271018)
68. Saito Y, Takeda J, Okada M, Kobayashi J, Kato A et al. (2013) The proteasome factor Bag101 binds to Rad22 and suppresses homologous recombination. Sci Rep 3: 2022. PubMed: 23779158.
69. Asleson EN, Livingston DM (2003) Investigation of the stability of yeast rad52 mutant proteins uncovers post-translational and transcriptional regulation of Rad52p. Genetics 163: 91-101. PubMed: 12586699. (Pubitemid 36222656)
70. Branzei D, Vanoli F, Foiani M (2008) SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 456: 915-920. doi:10.1038/nature07587. PubMed: 19092928.
71. Sale JE (2012) Competition, collaboration and coordination-determining how cells bypass DNA damage. J Cell Sci 125: 1633-1643. doi:10.1242/jcs.094748. PubMed: 22499669.
72. Richly H, Rape M, Braun S, Rumpf S, Hoege C et al. (2005) A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects CDC48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell 120: 73-84. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.013. PubMed: 15652483. (Pubitemid 40094604)
73. Schuberth C, Buchberger A (2008) UBX domain proteins: major regulators of the AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97. Cell Mol Life Sci 65: 2360-2371. doi:10.1007/s00018- 008-8072-8. PubMed: 18438607.
74. Nie M, Aslanian A, Prudden J, Heideker J, Vashisht AA et al. (2012) Dual recruitment of Cdc48 (p97)-Ufd1-Npl4 ubiquitin-selective segregase by small ubiquitin-like modifier protein (SUMO) and ubiquitin in SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase-mediated genome stability functions. J Biol Chem 287: 29610-29619. doi:10.1074/jbc.M112.379768. PubMed: 22730331.
75. Hannich JT, Lewis A, Kroetz MB, Li SJ, Heide H et al. (2005) Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280: 4102-4110. PubMed: 15590687. (Pubitemid 40288574)
76. Makhnevych T, Sydorskyy Y, Xin X, Srikumar T, Vizeacoumar FJ et al. (2009) Global map of SUMO function revealed by protein-protein interaction and genetic networks. Mol Cell 33: 124-135. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.025. PubMed: 19150434.
77. Zhou W, Ryan JJ, Zhou H (2004) Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J Biol Chem 279: 32262-32268. doi:10.1074/jbc.M404173200. PubMed: 15166219. (Pubitemid 39014675)
78. Wohlschlegel JA, Johnson ES, Reed SI, Yates JR 3rd (2004) Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 45662-45668. doi:10.1074/jbc.M409203200. PubMed: 15326169. (Pubitemid 39491554)
79. Bergink S, Ammon T, Kern M, Schermelleh L, Leonhardt H et al. (2013) Role of Cdc48/p97 as a SUMO-targeted segregase curbing Rad51-Rad52 interaction. Nat Cell Biol 15: 526-532. doi:10.1038/ncb2729. PubMed: 23624404.
80. Xie Y, Kerscher O, Kroetz MB, McConchie HF, Sung P et al. (2007) The yeast Hex3.Slx8 heterodimer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation. J Biol Chem 282: 34176-34184. doi:10.1074/jbc.M706025200. PubMed: 17848550. (Pubitemid 350159438)
81. Ii T, Fung J, Mullen JR, Brill SJ (2007) The yeast Slx5-Slx8 DNA integrity complex displays ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell Cycle 6: 2800-9.80. Kalocsay M, Hiller NJ. PubMed: 18032921
82. Kannouche PL, Wing J, Lehmann AR (2004) Interaction of human DNA polymerase eta with monoubiquitinated PCNA: a possible mechanism for the polymerase switch in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 14: 491-500. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00259-X. PubMed: 15149598. (Pubitemid 38648802)
83. Watanabe K, Tateishi S, Kawasuji M, Tsurimoto T, Inoue H et al. (2004) Rad18 guides poleta to replication stalling sites through physical interaction and PCNA monoubiquitination. EMBO J 23: 3886-3896. doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600383. PubMed: 15359278. (Pubitemid 39389719)
84. Brown M, Zhu Y, Hemmingsen SM, Xiao W (2002) Structural and functional conservation of error-free DNA postreplication repair in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. DNA Repair (Amst) 1: 869-880. doi:10.1016/S1568-7864(02)00111-8. PubMed: 12531016.
85. James P, Halladay J, Craig EA (1996) Genomic libraries and a host strain designed for highly efficient two-hybrid selection in yeast. Genetics 144: 1425-1436. PubMed: 8978031.
86. Sato M, Dhut S, Toda T (2005) New drug-resistant cassettes for gene disruption and epitope tagging in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 22: 583-591. doi:10.1002/yea.1233. PubMed: 15942936. (Pubitemid 40932159)
87. Bannister AJ, Cook A, Kouzarides T (1991) In vitro DNA binding activity of Fos/Jun and BZLF1 but not C/EBP is affected by redox changes. Oncogene 6: 1243-1250. PubMed: 1907361. (Pubitemid 21924214)
88. Noguchi C, Noguchi E (2007) Sap1 promotes the association of the replication fork protection complex with chromatin and is involved in the replication checkpoint in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 175: 553-566. doi:10.1534/genetics.106.065334. PubMed: 17151242. (Pubitemid 46798258)
89. Lyne R, Burns G, Mata J, Penkett CJ, Rustici G et al. (2003) Whole-genome microarrays of fission yeast: characteristics, accuracy, reproducibility, and processing of array data. BMC Genomics 4: 27. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-4-27. PubMed: 12854975.
90. Simon P (2003) Q-Gene: processing quantitative real-time RT-PCR data. Bioinformatics 19: 1439-1440. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg157. PubMed: 12874059.
91. Xhemalce B, Riising EM, Baumann P, Dejean A, Arcangioli B et al. (2007) Role of SUMO in the dynamics of telomere maintenance in fission yeast. Retrieved onpublished at whilst December year 1111 from Proc Natl Acad Sci. U S A. 104:893-8
92. Thon G, Bjerling P, Bünner CM, Verhein-Hansen J (2002) Expression-state boundaries in the mating-type region in fission yeast. Genetics 161:611-22 (Pubitemid 34705402)
93. Nielsen IS, Nielsen O, Murray JM, Thon G (2002) The fission yeast ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UbcP3, Ubc15 and Rhp6 affect transcriptional silencing of the mating-type region. Eukaryot Cell 1:613-25 (Pubitemid 36562387)