Global analysis of SUMO chain function reveals multiple roles in chromatin regulation

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 201, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 145-163

  Srikumar, Tharan ^a,b   Lewicki, Megan C ^a,b   Costanzo, Michael ^b   Tkach, Johnny M ^b   van Bakel, Harm ^b,c   Tsui, Kyle ^b,c   Johnson, Erica S ^d   Brown, Grant W ^b   Andrews, Brenda J ^b,c   Boone, Charles ^b,c   Giaever, Guri ^b,c   Nislow, Corey ^b,c   Raught, Brian ^a,b  

^a PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; SUMO PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GENE; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; YEAST;

CHROMATIN; MUTATION; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, MESSENGER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; SUMOYLATION;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84876313595     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201210019     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Abed, M., K.C. Barry, D. Kenyagin, B. Koltun, T.M. Phippen, J.J. Delrow, S.M. Parkhurst, and A. Orian. 2011. Degringolade, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase, inhibits Hairy/Groucho-mediated repression. EMBO J. 30:1289-1301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.42
2. Ashton, T.M., and I.D. Hickson. 2010. Yeast as a model system to study RecQ helicase function. DNA Repair (Amst.). 9:303-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.12.007
3. Baryshnikova, A., M. Costanzo, Y. Kim, H. Ding, J. Koh, K. Toufighi, J.Y. Youn, J. Ou, B.J. San Luis, S. Bandyopadhyay, et al. 2010. Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat. Methods. 7:1017-1024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1534
4. Bencsath, K.P., M.S. Podgorski, V.R. Pagala, C.A. Slaughter, and B.A. Schulman. 2002. Identification of a multifunctional binding site on Ubc9p required for Smt3p conjugation. J. Biol. Chem. 277:47938-47945. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M207442200
5. Biggins, S., N. Bhalla, A. Chang, D.L. Smith, and A.W. Murray. 2001. Genes involved in sister chromatid separation and segregation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 159:453-470.
6. Branzei, D., and M. Foiani. 2007. Template switching: from replication fork repair to genome rearrangements. Cell. 131:1228-1230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.007
7. Branzei, D., J. Sollier, G. Liberi, X. Zhao, D. Maeda, M. Seki, T. Enomoto, K. Ohta, and M. Foiani. 2006. Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell. 127:509-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.050
8. Bruderer, R., M.H. Tatham, A. Plechanovova, I. Matic, A.K. Garg, and R.T. Hay. 2011. Purification and identification of endogenous poly-SUMO conjugates. EMBO Rep. 12:142-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.206
9. Bylebyl, G.R., I. Belichenko, and E.S. Johnson. 2003. The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2 prevents accumulation of SUMO chains in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 278:44113-44120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M308357200
10. Castro, P.H., R.M. Tavares, E.R. Bejarano, and H. Azevedo. 2012. SUMO, a heavyweight player in plant abiotic stress responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69:3269-3283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-012-1094-2
11. Chan, J.N., B.P. Poon, J. Salvi, J.B. Olsen, A. Emili, and K. Mekhail. 2011. Perinuclear cohibin complexes maintain replicative life span via roles at distinct silent chromatin domains. Dev. Cell. 20:867-879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.05.014
12. Chavez, A., V. George, V. Agrawal, and F.B. Johnson. 2010. Sumoylation and the structural maintenance of chromosomes (Smc) 5/6 complex slow senescence through recombination intermediate resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 285:11922-11930. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.041277
13. Chen, X.L., H.R. Silver, L. Xiong, I. Belichenko, C. Adegite, and E.S. Johnson. 2007. Topoisomerase I-dependent viability loss in saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in both SUMO conjugation and DNA repair. Genetics. 177:17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.074708
14. Conconi, A., R.M. Widmer, T. Koller, and J.M. Sogo. 1989. Two different chromatin structures coexist in ribosomal RNA genes throughout the cell cycle. Cell. 57:753-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90790-3
15. Costanzo, M., A. Baryshnikova, J. Bellay, Y. Kim, E.D. Spear, C.S. Sevier, H. Ding, J.L. Koh, K. Toufighi, S. Mostafavi, et al. 2010. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science. 327:425-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180823
16. Cremona, C.A., P. Sarangi, Y. Yang, L.E. Hang, S. Rahman, and X. Zhao. 2012. Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol. Cell. 45:422-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.028
17. D'Ambrosio, C., C.K. Schmidt, Y. Katou, G. Kelly, T. Itoh, K. Shirahige, and F. Uhlmann. 2008. Identification of cis-acting sites for condensin loading onto budding yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev. 22:2215-2227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1675708
18. Dammann, R., R. Lucchini, T. Koller, and J.M. Sogo. 1995. Transcription in the yeast rRNA gene locus: distribution of the active gene copies and chromatin structure of their flanking regulatory sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:5294-5303.
19. Delorme, E. 1989. Transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electroporation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:2242-2246.
20. Denison, C., A.D. Rudner, S.A. Gerber, C.E. Bakalarski, D. Moazed, and S.P. Gygi. 2005. A proteomic strategy for gaining insights into protein sumoylation in yeast. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 4:246-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M400154-MCP200
21. Elrouby, N., and G. Coupland. 2010. Proteome-wide screens for small ubiquitinlike modifier (SUMO) substrates identify Arabidopsis proteins implicated in diverse biological processes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:17415-17420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1005452107
22. Felberbaum, R., and M. Hochstrasser. 2008. Ulp2 and the DNA damage response: desumoylation enables safe passage through mitosis. Cell Cycle. 7:52-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.1.5218
23. Ferreira, H.C., B. Luke, H. Schober, V. Kalck, J. Lingner, and S.M. Gasser. 2011. The PIAS homologue Siz2 regulates perinuclear telomere position and telomerase activity in budding yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 13:867-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2263
24. Fryrear, K.A., X. Guo, O. Kerscher, and O.J. Semmes. 2012. The Sumotargeted ubiquitin ligase RNF4 regulates the localization and function of the HTLV-1 oncoprotein Tax. Blood. 119:1173-1181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-358564
25. Galanty, Y., R. Belotserkovskaya, J. Coates, and S.P. Jackson. 2012. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 26:1179-1195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.188284.112
26. Garcia-Dominguez, M., and J.C. Reyes. 2009. SUMO association with repressor complexes, emerging routes for transcriptional control. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1789:451-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2009.07.001
27. Gasch, A.P., P.T. Spellman, C.M. Kao, O. Carmel-Harel, M.B. Eisen, G. Storz, D. Botstein, and P.O. Brown. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11: 4241-4257.
28. Gietz, R.D., and R.A. Woods. 2002. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 350:87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(02)50957-5
29. Gill, G. 2005. Something about SUMO inhibits transcription. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15:536-541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2005.07.004
30. Goldfless, S.J., A.S. Morag, K.A. Belisle, V.A. Sutera Jr., and S.T. Lovett. 2006. DNA repeat rearrangements mediated by DnaK-dependent replication fork repair. Mol. Cell. 21:595-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.01.025
31. Golovnin, A., I. Volkov, and P. Georgiev. 2012. SUMO conjugation is required for the assembly of Drosophila Su(Hw) and Mod(mdg4) into insulator bodies that facilitate insulator complex formation. J. Cell Sci. 125:2064-2074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.100172
32. Guacci, V., E. Hogan, and D. Koshland. 1994. Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125:517-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.125.3.517
33. Hay, R.T. 2005. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol. Cell. 18:1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.03.012
34. Heller, R.C., and K.J. Marians. 2006. Replication fork reactivation downstream of a blocked nascent leading strand. Nature. 439:557-562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04329
35. Hickson, I.D., and H.W. Mankouri. 2011. Processing of homologous recombination repair intermediates by the Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 and Mus81-Mms4 complexes. Cell Cycle. 10:3078-3085. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.18.16919
36. Hochstrasser, M. 2000. Biochemistry. All in the ubiquitin family. Science. 289:563-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5479.563
37. Hohmann, S. 2009. Control of high osmolarity signalling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 583:4025-4029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.069
38. Huh, W.K., J.V. Falvo, L.C. Gerke, A.S. Carroll, R.W. Howson, J.S. Weissman, and E.K. O'Shea. 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature. 425:686-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02026
39. Ivanov, A.V., H. Peng, V. Yurchenko, K.L. Yap, D.G. Negorev, D.C. Schultz, E. Psulkowski, W.J. Fredericks, D.E. White, G.G. Maul, et al. 2007. PHD domain-mediated E3 ligase activity directs intramolecular sumoylation of an adjacent bromodomain required for gene silencing. Mol. Cell. 28:823-837. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.012
40. Jeram, S.M., T. Srikumar, X.D. Zhang, H. Anne Eisenhauer, R. Rogers, P.G. Pedrioli, M. Matunis, and B. Raught. 2010. An improved SUMmOn-based methodology for the identification of ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like protein conjugation sites identifies novel ubiquitin-like protein chain linkages. Proteomics. 10:254-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900648
41. Johnson, E.S. 2004. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:355-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074118
42. Johzuka, K., and T. Horiuchi. 2009. The cis element and factors required for condensin recruitment to chromosomes. Mol. Cell. 34:26-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.02.021
43. Jorgensen, P., J.L. Nishikawa, B.J. Breitkreutz, and M. Tyers. 2002. Systematic identification of pathways that couple cell growth and division in yeast. Science. 297:395-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1070850
44. Juneau, K., C. Palm, M. Miranda, and R.W. Davis. 2007. High-density yeasttiling array reveals previously undiscovered introns and extensive regulation of meiotic splicing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:1522-1527. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0610354104
45. Kerscher, O., R. Felberbaum, and M. Hochstrasser. 2006. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22: 159-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010605.093503
46. Kessler, J.D., K.T. Kahle, T. Sun, K.L. Meerbrey, M.R. Schlabach, E.M. Schmitt, S.O. Skinner, Q. Xu, M.Z. Li, Z.C. Hartman, et al. 2012. A SUMOylationdependent transcriptional subprogram is required for Myc-driven tumorigenesis. Science. 335:348-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1212728
47. Klein, H.L. 2006. A SUMOry of DNA replication: synthesis, damage, and repair. Cell. 127:455-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.10.019
48. Koh, J.L., H. Ding, M. Costanzo, A. Baryshnikova, K. Toufighi, G.D. Bader, C.L. Myers, B.J. Andrews, and C. Boone. 2010. DRYGIN: a database of quantitative genetic interaction networks in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 38(Database issue):D502-D507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp820
49. Lallemand-Breitenbach, V., M. Jeanne, S. Benhenda, R. Nasr, M. Lei, L. Peres, J. Zhou, J. Zhu, B. Raught, and H. de Thé. 2008. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitinmediated pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:547-555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1717
50. Lee, M.T., A.A. Bakir, K.N. Nguyen, and J. Bachant. 2011. The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2p is required to prevent recombination-induced chromosome segregation lethality following DNA replication stress. PLoS Genet. 7:e1001355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001355
51. Lehmann, A.R., and R.P. Fuchs. 2006. Gaps and forks in DNA replication: Rediscovering old models. DNA Repair (Amst.). 5:1495-1498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.07.002
52. Li, S.J., and M. Hochstrasser. 1999. A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature. 398:246-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/18457
53. Li, Y.J., J.M. Stark, D.J. Chen, D.K. Ann, and Y. Chen. 2010. Role of SUMO: SIM-mediated protein-protein interaction in non-homologous end joining. Oncogene. 29:3509-3518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.108
54. Liberi, G., G. Maffioletti, C. Lucca, I. Chiolo, A. Baryshnikova, C. Cotta-Ramusino, M. Lopes, A. Pellicioli, J.E. Haber, and M. Foiani. 2005. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 19:339-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.322605
55. Linger, J., and J.K. Tyler. 2005. The yeast histone chaperone chromatin assembly factor 1 protects against double-strand DNA-damaging agents. Genetics. 171:1513-1522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.043000
56. Livak, K.J., and T.D. Schmittgen. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 25:402-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262
57. MacPherson, M.J., L.G. Beatty, W. Zhou, M. Du, and P.D. Sadowski. 2009. The CTCF insulator protein is posttranslationally modified by SUMO. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:714-725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00825-08
58. Makhnevych, T., C. Ptak, C.P. Lusk, J.D. Aitchison, and R.W. Wozniak. 2007. The role of karyopherins in the regulated sumoylation of septins. J. Cell Biol. 177:39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200608066
59. Makhnevych, T., Y. Sydorskyy, X. Xin, T. Srikumar, F.J. Vizeacoumar, S.M. Jeram, Z. Li, S. Bahr, B.J. Andrews, C. Boone, and B. Raught. 2009. Global map of SUMO function revealed by protein-protein interaction and genetic networks. Mol. Cell. 33:124-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.025
60. Matic, I., B. Macek, M. Hilger, T.C. Walther, and M. Mann. 2008. Phosphorylation of SUMO-1 occurs in vivo and is conserved through evolution. J. Proteome Res. 7:4050-4057. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr800368m
61. Mazur, M.J., and H.A. van den Burg. 2012. Global SUMO proteome responses guide gene regulation, mRNA biogenesis, and plant stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 3:215. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2012.00215
62. Mekhail, K., J. Seebacher, S.P. Gygi, and D. Moazed. 2008. Role for perinuclear chromosome tethering in maintenance of genome stability. Nature. 456:667-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07460
63. Meluh, P.B., and D. Koshland. 1995. Evidence that the MIF2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a centromere protein with homology to the mammalian centromere protein CENP-C. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:793-807.
64. Nathan, D., K. Ingvarsdottir, D.E. Sterner, G.R. Bylebyl, M. Dokmanovic, J.A. Dorsey, K.A. Whelan, M. Krsmanovic, W.S. Lane, P.B. Meluh, et al. 2006. Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications. Genes Dev. 20:966-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1404206
65. Nie, M., Y. Xie, J.A. Loo, and A.J. Courey. 2009. Genetic and proteomic evidence for roles of Drosophila SUMO in cell cycle control, Ras signaling, and early pattern formation. PLoS ONE. 4:e5905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005905
66. Nie, M., A. Aslanian, J. Prudden, J. Heideker, A.A. Vashisht, J.A. Wohlschlegel, J.R. Yates III, and M.N. Boddy. 2012. Dual recruitment of Cdc48 (p97)-Ufd1-Npl4 ubiquitin-selective segregase by small ubiquitin-like modifier protein (SUMO) and ubiquitin in SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase-mediated genome stability functions. J. Biol. Chem. 287:29610-29619. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.379768
67. Ouyang, J., Y. Shi, A. Valin, Y. Xuan, and G. Gill. 2009. Direct binding of CoREST1 to SUMO-2/3 contributes to gene-specific repression by the LSD1/CoREST1/HDAC complex. Mol. Cell. 34:145-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.03.013
68. Panse, V.G., B. Küster, T. Gerstberger, and E. Hurt. 2003. Unconventional tethering of Ulp1 to the transport channel of the nuclear pore complex by karyopherins. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:21-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb893
69. Pérez de Castro, I., C. Aguirre-Portolés, B. Martin, G. Fernández-Miranda, A. Klotzbucher, M.H. Kubbutat, D. Megías, Y. Arlot-Bonnemains, and M. Malumbres. 2011. A SUMOylation motif in Aurora-A: implications for spindle dynamics and oncogenesis. Front Oncol. 1:50.
70. Perocchi, F., Z. Xu, S. Clauder-Münster, and L.M. Steinmetz. 2007. Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:e128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm683
71. Perry, J.J., J.A. Tainer, and M.N. Boddy. 2008. A SIM-ultaneous role for SUMO and ubiquitin. Trends Biochem. Sci. 33:201-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2008.02.001
72. Prudden, J., S. Pebernard, G. Raffa, D.A. Slavin, J.J. Perry, J.A. Tainer, C.H. McGowan, and M.N. Boddy. 2007. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J. 26:4089-4101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601838
73. Rand, J.D., and C.M. Grant. 2006. The thioredoxin system protects ribosomes against stress-induced aggregation. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17:387-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0520
74. Rosonina, E., S.M. Duncan, and J.L. Manley. 2010. SUMO functions in constitutive transcription and during activation of inducible genes in yeast. Genes Dev. 24:1242-1252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1917910
75. Ross, S., J.L. Best, L.I. Zon, and G. Gill. 2002. SUMO-1 modification represses Sp3 transcriptional activation and modulates its subnuclear localization. Mol. Cell. 10:831-842. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00682-2
76. Rossi, M.L., A.K. Ghosh, and V.A. Bohr. 2010. Roles of Werner syndrome protein in protection of genome integrity. DNA Repair (Amst.). 9:331-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.12.011
77. Ryan, M., L.A. Graham, and T.H. Stevens. 2008. Voa1p functions in V-ATPase assembly in the yeast endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:5131-5142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-06-0629
78. Saether, T., D.R. Pattabiraman, A.H. Alm-Kristiansen, L.T. Vogt-Kielland, T.J. Gonda, and O.S. Gabrielsen. 2011. A functional SUMO-interacting motif in the transactivation domain of c-Myb regulates its myeloid transforming ability. Oncogene. 30:212-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.397
79. Santiago, A., A.C. Godsey, J. Hossain, L.Y. Zhao, and D. Liao. 2009. Identification of two independent SUMO-interacting motifs in Daxx: evolutionary conservation from Drosophila to humans and their biochemical functions. Cell Cycle. 8:76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.8.1.7493
80. Schwartz, D.C., R. Felberbaum, and M. Hochstrasser. 2007. The Ulp2 SUMO protease is required for cell division following termination of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6948-6961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00774-07
81. Seufert, W., B. Futcher, and S. Jentsch. 1995. Role of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme in degradation of S- and M-phase cyclins. Nature. 373:78-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/373078a0
82. Shiio, Y., and R.N. Eisenman. 2003. Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 100:13225-13230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1735528100
83. Shin, E.J., H.M. Shin, E. Nam, W.S. Kim, J.H. Kim, B.H. Oh, and Y. Yun. 2012. DeSUMOylating isopeptidase: a second class of SUMO protease. EMBO Rep. 13:339-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.3
84. Stielow, B., A. Sapetschnig, I. Krüger, N. Kunert, A. Brehm, M. Boutros, and G. Suske. 2008a. Identification of SUMO-dependent chromatin-associated transcriptional repression components by a genome-wide RNAi screen. Mol. Cell. 29:742-754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.12.032
85. Stielow, B., A. Sapetschnig, C. Wink, I. Krüger, and G. Suske. 2008b. SUMOmodified Sp3 represses transcription by provoking local heterochromatic gene silencing. EMBO Rep. 9:899-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/embor.2008.127
86. Stielow, B., I. Krüger, R. Diezko, F. Finkernagel, N. Gillemans, J. Kong-a-San, S. Philipsen, and G. Suske. 2010. Epigenetic silencing of spermatocytespecific and neuronal genes by SUMO modification of the transcription factor Sp3. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001203
87. Sun, H., J.D. Leverson, and T. Hunter. 2007. Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins. EMBO J. 26:4102-4112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601839
88. Takahashi, Y., M. Iwase, M. Konishi, M. Tanaka, A. Toh-e, and Y. Kikuchi. 1999. Smt3, a SUMO-1 homolog, is conjugated to Cdc3, a component of septin rings at the mother-bud neck in budding yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 259:582-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.1999.0821
89. Takahashi, Y., S. Dulev, X. Liu, N.J. Hiller, X. Zhao, and A. Strunnikov. 2008. Cooperation of sumoylated chromosomal proteins in rDNA maintenance. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000215
90. Tang, H.M., K.L. Siu, C.M. Wong, and D.Y. Jin. 2009. Loss of yeast peroxiredoxin Tsa1p induces genome instability through activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and elevation of dNTP levels. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000697
91. Tatham, M.H., M.C. Geoffroy, L. Shen, A. Plechanovova, N. Hattersley, E.G. Jaffray, J.J. Palvimo, and R.T. Hay. 2008. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:538-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1716
92. Tempé, D., M. Piechaczyk, and G. Bossis. 2008. SUMO under stress. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36:874-878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BST0360874
93. Tkach, J.M., A. Yimit, A.Y. Lee, M. Riffle, M. Costanzo, D. Jaschob, J.A. Hendry, J. Ou, J. Moffat, C. Boone, et al. 2012. Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:966-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2549
94. Tong, A.H.Y., and C. Boone. 2007. High-throughput strain construction and systematic synthetic lethal screening in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In Yeast Gene Analysis, Second Edition. 36:369-707.
95. Torres-Rosell, J., F. Machín, S. Farmer, A. Jarmuz, T. Eydmann, J.Z. Dalgaard, and L. Aragón. 2005. SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:412-419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1239
96. Tsui, K., T. Durbic, M. Gebbia, and C. Nislow. 2012. Genomic approaches for determining nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Methods Mol. Biol. 833:389-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-477-3_23
97. Uchimura, Y., T. Ichimura, J. Uwada, T. Tachibana, S. Sugahara, M. Nakao, and H. Saitoh. 2006. Involvement of SUMO modification in MBD1- and MCAF1-mediated heterochromatin formation. J. Biol. Chem. 281:23180-23190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M602280200
98. Ullmann, R., C.D. Chien, M.L. Avantaggiati, and S. Muller. 2012. An acetylation switch regulates SUMO-dependent protein interaction networks. Mol. Cell. 46:759-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.006
99. Untergasser, A., H. Nijveen, X. Rao, T. Bisseling, R. Geurts, and J.A. Leunissen. 2007. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res. 35(Web Server issue):W71-W74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm306
100. Vas, A.C., C.A. Andrews, K. Kirkland Matesky, and D.J. Clarke. 2007. In vivo analysis of chromosome condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18:557-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-05-0454
101. Vizeacoumar, F.J., N. van Dyk, F. S Vizeacoumar, V. Cheung, J. Li, Y. Sydorskyy, N. Case, Z. Li, A. Datti, C. Nislow, et al. 2010. Integrating high-throughput genetic interaction mapping and high-content screening to explore yeast spindle morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 188:69-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200909013
102. Wan, J., D. Subramonian, and X.D. Zhang. 2012. SUMOylation in control of accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 13:467-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138920312802430563
103. Wang, Z., and G. Prelich. 2009. Quality control of a transcriptional regulator by SUMO-targeted degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:1694-1706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01470-08
104. Wang, Z., G.M. Jones, and G. Prelich. 2006. Genetic analysis connects SLX5 and SLX8 to the SUMO pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 172:1499-1509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.052811
105. Westermann, B., and W. Neupert. 2000. Mitochondria-targeted green fluorescent proteins: convenient tools for the study of organelle biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 16:1421-1427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0061(200011)16:15<1421::AID-YEA624>3.0.CO;2-U
106. Wohlschlegel, J.A., E.S. Johnson, S.I. Reed, and J.R. Yates III. 2004. Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 279:45662-45668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M409203200
107. Wright, R. 2000. Transmission electron microscopy of yeast. Microsc. Res. Tech. 51:496-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0029(20001215)51:6<496::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-9
108. Wu, L., and I.D. Hickson. 2006. DNA helicases required for homologous recombination and repair of damaged replication forks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 40:279-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090636
109. Xiong, L., X.L. Chen, H.R. Silver, N.T. Ahmed, and E.S. Johnson. 2009. Deficient SUMO attachment to Flp recombinase leads to homologous recombination-dependent hyperamplification of the yeast 2 microm circle plasmid. Mol. Biol. Cell. 20:1241-1251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-06-0659
110. Yan, Z., M. Costanzo, L.E. Heisler, J. Paw, F. Kaper, B.J. Andrews, C. Boone, G. Giaever, and C. Nislow. 2008. Yeast Barcoders: a chemogenomic application of a universal donor-strain collection carrying bar-code identifiers. Nat. Methods. 5:719-725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1231
111. Yang, S.H., and A.D. Sharrocks. 2004. SUMO promotes HDAC-mediated transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. 13:611-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00060-7
112. Yin, Y., A. Seifert, J.S. Chua, J.F. Maure, F. Golebiowski, and R.T. Hay. 2012. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 26:1196-1208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.189274.112
113. Zhou, W., J.J. Ryan, and H. Zhou. 2004. Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J. Biol. Chem. 279:32262-32268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404173200