Erratum: Distinct SUMO Ligases Cooperate with Esc2 and Slx5 to Suppress Duplication-Mediated Genome Rearrangements (PLoS Genet (2013) 9:8 (e1003670) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003670);Distinct SUMO Ligases Cooperate with Esc2 and Slx5 to Suppress Duplication-Mediated Genome Rearrangements

PLoS Genetics

Volumn 9, Issue 8, 2013, Pages

  Albuquerque, Claudio P ^a   Wang, Guoliang ^a   Lee, Nancy S ^a   Kolodner, Richard D ^a,b,c   Putnam, Christopher D ^a   Zhou, Huilin ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME PROTEIN; DNA DIRECTED RNA POLYMERASE; PROTEIN ESC2; PROTEIN MMS21; PROTEIN SIZ 1; PROTEIN SIZ 2; PROTEIN SLX5; PROTEIN SLX6; PROTEIN SLX7; PROTEIN SLX8; SUMO PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE REPRESSION; IN VIVO STUDY; ISOTOPE LABELING; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUMOYLATION;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

GENE DUPLICATION; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; LIGASES; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; SUMO-1 PROTEIN; SUMOYLATION; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

EID: 84884638785     PISSN: 15537390     EISSN: 15537404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PGEN.1006302     Document Type: Erratum

References (70)

1. Gordenin DA, Resnick MA, (1998) Yeast ARMs (DNA at-risk motifs) can reveal sources of genome instability. Mutat Res 400: 45-58.
2. Deininger PL, Batzer MA, (1999) Alu repeats and human disease. Mol Genet Metab 67: 183-193 doi:10.1006/mgme.1999.2864.
3. Ji Y, Eichler EE, Schwartz S, Nicholls RD, (2000) Structure of chromosomal duplicons and their role in mediating human genomic disorders. Genome Res 10: 597-610.
4. Kolodner RD, Putnam CD, Myung K, (2002) Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297: 552-557 doi:10.1126/science.1075277.
5. Putnam CD, Hayes TK, Kolodner RD, (2009) Specific pathways prevent duplication-mediated genome rearrangements. Nature 460: 984-989 doi:10.1038/nature08217.
6. Ohya T, Arai H, Kubota Y, Shinagawa H, Hishida T, (2008) A SUMO-like domain protein, Esc2, is required for genome integrity and sister chromatid cohesion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 180: 41-50 doi:10.1534/genetics.107.086249.
7. Sollier J, Driscoll R, Castellucci F, Foiani M, Jackson SP, et al. (2009) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Esc2 and Smc5-6 proteins promote sister chromatid junction-mediated intra-S repair. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1671-1682 doi:10.1091/mbc.E08-08-0875.
8. Novatchkova M, Bachmair A, Eisenhaber B, Eisenhaber F, (2005) Proteins with two SUMO-like domains in chromatin-associated complexes: the RENi (Rad60-Esc2-NIP45) family. BMC Bioinformatics 6: 22 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-6-22.
9. Xie Y, Kerscher O, Kroetz MB, McConchie HF, Sung P, et al. (2007) The yeast Hex3.Slx8 heterodimer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation. J Biol Chem 282: 34176-34184 doi:10.1074/jbc.M706025200.
10. Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G, Slavin DA, Perry JJP, et al. (2007) SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 26: 4089-4101 doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7601838.
11. Johnson ES, Gupta AA, (2001) An E3-like factor that promotes SUMO conjugation to the yeast septins. Cell 106: 735-744.
12. Putnam CD, Hayes TK, Kolodner RD, (2010) Post-replication repair suppresses duplication-mediated genome instability. PLoS Genet 6: e1000933 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000933.
13. Kats ES, Enserink JM, Martinez S, Kolodner RD, (2009) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad6 postreplication repair and Siz1/Srs2 homologous recombination-inhibiting pathways process DNA damage that arises in asf1 mutants. Mol Cell Biol 29: 5226-5237 doi:10.1128/MCB.00894-09.
14. Hochstrasser M, (2001) SP-RING for SUMO: new functions bloom for a ubiquitin-like protein. Cell 107: 5-8.
15. Johnson ES, Schwienhorst I, Dohmen RJ, Blobel G, (1997) The ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p is activated for conjugation to other proteins by an Aos1p/Uba2p heterodimer. EMBO J 16: 5509-5519 doi:10.1093/emboj/16.18.5509.
16. Johnson ES, Blobel G, (1997) Ubc9p is the conjugating enzyme for the ubiquitin-like protein Smt3p. J Biol Chem 272: 26799-26802.
17. Zhao X, Blobel G, (2005) A SUMO ligase is part of a nuclear multiprotein complex that affects DNA repair and chromosomal organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 4777-4782 doi:10.1073/pnas.0500537102.
18. Li SJ, Hochstrasser M, (1999) A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 398: 246-251 doi:10.1038/18457.
19. Li SJ, Hochstrasser M, (2000) The yeast ULP2 (SMT4) gene encodes a novel protease specific for the ubiquitin-like Smt3 protein. Mol Cell Biol 20: 2367-2377.
20. Mossessova E, Lima CD, (2000) Ulp1-SUMO crystal structure and genetic analysis reveal conserved interactions and a regulatory element essential for cell growth in yeast. Mol Cell 5: 865-876.
21. Strunnikov AV, Hogan E, Koshland D, (1995) SMC2, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene essential for chromosome segregation and condensation, defines a subgroup within the SMC family. Genes Dev 9: 587-599.
22. Li S-J, Hochstrasser M, (2003) The Ulp1 SUMO isopeptidase: distinct domains required for viability, nuclear envelope localization, and substrate specificity. J Cell Biol 160: 1069-1081 doi:10.1083/jcb.200212052.
23. Reindle A, Belichenko I, Bylebyl GR, Chen XL, Gandhi N, et al. (2006) Multiple domains in Siz SUMO ligases contribute to substrate selectivity. J Cell Sci 119: 4749-4757 doi:10.1242/jcs.03243.
24. Matunis MJ, Pickart CM, (2005) Beginning at the end with SUMO. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 565-566 doi:10.1038/nsmb0705-565.
25. Bergink S, Jentsch S, (2009) Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 458: 461-467 doi:10.1038/nature07963.
26. Cremona CA, Sarangi P, Yang Y, Hang LE, Rahman S, et al. (2012) Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol Cell 45: 422-432 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2011.11.028.
27. Takahashi Y, Yong-Gonzalez V, Kikuchi Y, Strunnikov A, (2006) SIZ1/SIZ2 control of chromosome transmission fidelity is mediated by the sumoylation of topoisomerase II. Genetics 172: 783-794 doi:10.1534/genetics.105.047167.
28. McAleenan A, Cordón-Preciado V, Clemente-Blanco A, Liu I-C, Sen N, et al. (2012) SUMOylation of the α-Kleisin Subunit of Cohesin Is Required for DNA Damage-Induced Cohesion. Curr Biol 22: 1564-1575 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.045.
29. Burgess RC, Rahman S, Lisby M, Rothstein R, Zhao X, (2007) The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6153-6162 doi:10.1128/MCB.00787-07.
30. Montpetit B, Hazbun TR, Fields S, Hieter P, (2006) Sumoylation of the budding yeast kinetochore protein Ndc10 is required for Ndc10 spindle localization and regulation of anaphase spindle elongation. J Cell Biol 174: 653-663 doi:10.1083/jcb.200605019.
31. Zhou W, Ryan JJ, Zhou H, (2004) Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J Biol Chem 279: 32262-32268 doi:10.1074/jbc.M404173200.
32. Denison C, Rudner AD, Gerber SA, Bakalarski CE, Moazed D, et al. (2005) A proteomic strategy for gaining insights into protein sumoylation in yeast. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 246-254 doi:10.1074/mcp.M400154-MCP200.
33. Panse VG, Hardeland U, Werner T, Kuster B, Hurt E, (2004) A proteome-wide approach identifies sumoylated substrate proteins in yeast. J Biol Chem 279: 41346-41351 doi:10.1074/jbc.M407950200.
34. Hannich JT, Lewis A, Kroetz MB, Li S-J, Heide H, et al. (2005) Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280: 4102-4110 doi:10.1074/jbc.M413209200.
35. Wohlschlegel JA, Johnson ES, Reed SI, Yates JR, (2004) Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279: 45662-45668 doi:10.1074/jbc.M409203200.
36. Chen XL, Silver HR, Xiong L, Belichenko I, Adegite C, et al. (2007) Topoisomerase I-dependent viability loss in saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in both SUMO conjugation and DNA repair. Genetics 177: 17-30 doi:10.1534/genetics.107.074708.
37. Hwang J-Y, Smith S, Ceschia A, Torres-Rosell J, Aragón L, et al. (2008) Smc5-Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications. DNA Repair (Amst) 7: 1426-1436 doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2008.05.006.
38. Duan X, Sarangi P, Liu X, Rangi GK, Zhao X, et al. (2009) Structural and functional insights into the roles of the Mms21 subunit of the Smc5/6 complex. Mol Cell 35: 657-668 doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2009.06.032.
39. Mankouri HW, Ngo H-P, Hickson ID, (2009) Esc2 and Sgs1 act in functionally distinct branches of the homologous recombination repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 20: 1683-1694 doi:10.1091/mbc.E08-08-0877.
40. Choi K, Szakal B, Chen Y-H, Branzei D, Zhao X, (2010) The Smc5/6 complex and Esc2 influence multiple replication-associated recombination processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 21: 2306-2314 doi:10.1091/mbc.E10-01-0050.
41. Ong S-E, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, et al. (2002) Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 1: 376-386.
42. Chen S-H, Albuquerque CP, Liang J, Suhandynata RT, Zhou H, (2010) A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J Biol Chem 285: 12803-12812 doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.106989.
43. Albuquerque CP, Smolka MB, Payne SH, Bafna V, Eng J, et al. (2008) A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 7: 1389-1396 doi:10.1074/mcp.M700468-MCP200.
44. Johnson ES, Blobel G, (1999) Cell cycle-regulated attachment of the ubiquitin-related protein SUMO to the yeast septins. J Cell Biol 147: 981-994.
45. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan G-L, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S, (2002) RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419: 135-141 doi:10.1038/nature00991.
46. Silver HR, Nissley JA, Reed SH, Hou Y-M, Johnson ES, (2011) A role for SUMO in nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 10: 1243-1251 doi:10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.09.013.
47. Takahashi Y, Dulev S, Liu X, Hiller NJ, Zhao X, et al. (2008) Cooperation of sumoylated chromosomal proteins in rDNA maintenance. PLoS Genet 4: e1000215 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000215.
48. Psakhye I, Jentsch S, (2012) Protein Group Modification and Synergy in the SUMO Pathway as Exemplified in DNA Repair. Cell 151: 807-820 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.10.021.
49. Song J, Durrin LK, Wilkinson TA, Krontiris TG, Chen Y, (2004) Identification of a SUMO-binding motif that recognizes SUMO-modified proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 14373-14378 doi:10.1073/pnas.0403498101.
50. Armstrong AA, Mohideen F, Lima CD, (2012) Recognition of SUMO-modified PCNA requires tandem receptor motifs in Srs2. Nature 483: 59-63 doi:10.1038/nature10883.
51. Koren A, Soifer I, Barkai N, (2010) MRC1-dependent scaling of the budding yeast DNA replication timing program. Genome Res 20: 781-790 doi:10.1101/gr.102764.109.
52. Parker JL, Bucceri A, Davies AA, Heidrich K, Windecker H, et al. (2008) SUMO modification of PCNA is controlled by DNA. EMBO J 27: 2422-2431 doi:10.1038/emboj.2008.162.
53. Xie Y, Rubenstein EM, Matt T, Hochstrasser M, (2010) SUMO-independent in vivo activity of a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase toward a short-lived transcription factor. Genes Dev 24: 893-903 doi:10.1101/gad.1906510.
54. Galanty Y, Belotserkovskaya R, Coates J, Jackson SP, (2012) RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev 26: 1179-1195 doi:10.1101/gad.188284.112.
55. Johnson ES, (2004) Protein modification by SUMO. Annu Rev Biochem 73: 355-382 doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074118.
56. Chen XL, Reindle A, Johnson ES, (2005) Misregulation of 2 microm circle copy number in a SUMO pathway mutant. Mol Cell Biol 25: 4311-4320 doi:10.1128/MCB.25.10.4311-4320.2005.
57. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao X, Maeda D, et al. (2006) Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509-522 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.050.
58. Byrne KP, Wolfe KH, (2005) The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res 15: 1456-1461 doi:10.1101/gr.3672305.
59. Prudden J, Perry JJP, Nie M, Vashisht AA, Arvai AS, et al. (2011) DNA repair and global sumoylation are regulated by distinct Ubc9 noncovalent complexes. Mol Cell Biol 31: 2299-2310 doi:10.1128/MCB.05188-11.
60. Boddy MN, Shanahan P, McDonald WH, Lopez-Girona A, Noguchi E, et al. (2003) Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates recombinational repair protein Rad60. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5939-5946.
61. Mullen JR, Das M, Brill SJ, (2011) Genetic evidence that polysumoylation bypasses the need for a SUMO-targeted Ub ligase. Genetics 187: 73-87 doi:10.1534/genetics.110.124347.
62. Chan JE, Kolodner RD, (2011) A genetic and structural study of genome rearrangements mediated by high copy repeat Ty1 elements. PLoS Genet 7: e1002089 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002089.
63. Ström L, Karlsson C, Lindroos HB, Wedahl S, Katou Y, et al. (2007) Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 317: 242-245 doi:10.1126/science.1140649.
64. Unal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Koshland D, (2007) DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 317: 245-248 doi:10.1126/science.1140637.
65. Sjögren C, Nasmyth K, (2001) Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Biol 11: 991-995.
66. Yamamoto A, Guacci V, Koshland D, (1996) Pds1p, an inhibitor of anaphase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J Cell Biol 133: 99-110.
67. Cohen-Fix O, Koshland D, (1997) The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 14361-14366.
68. Gardner R, Putnam CW, Weinert T, (1999) RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J 18: 3173-3185 doi:10.1093/emboj/18.11.3173.
69. Sanchez Y, Bachant J, Wang H, Hu F, Liu D, et al. (1999) Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286: 1166-1171.
70. Putnam CD, Kolodner RD, (2010) Determination of gross chromosomal rearrangement rates. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010: pdb.prot5492.