Public Regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in Recent United Nations Instruments on Business and Human Rights and the Juridification of CSR

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 136, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 699-714

  Buhmann, Karin ^a,b  

^a Department of International Economics and Management   (Denmark)

^b ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

CSR transparency and reporting; EU and CSR; Juridification of CSR; OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises; Politicization of business; Social licence to operate; UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights; UN Protect, Respect and Remedy Framework

Indexed keywords

EID: 84946434405     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2869-9     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Taking responsive regulation transnational: Strategies for international organizations. Regulation & Governance, 7(1), 97–113.
2. Act 546/2012 on a Complaints and Mediation Institution for Responsible Business Conduct, 18 June 2012.
3. Alston, P. (2005). The ‘Not-a-Cat’ syndrome. In P. Alston (Ed.), Non-state actors and human rights (pp. 3–36). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Arnold, D. (2010). Transnational corporations and the duty to respect basic human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 371–399.
5. Auld, G., Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2008). The new corporate social responsibility. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 33(1), 413–435.
6. Backer, L. C. (2006). Multinational corporations, transnational law: The United Nations’ norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations as a harbinger of corporate social responsibility in international law. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 37, 287–389.
7. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.
8. Bernaz, N. (2012). Enhancing corporate accountability for human rights violations: Is extraterritoriality the magic potion? Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 493–511.
9. Blair, M. M., Williams, C. A., & Lin, L.-W. (2008). The Roles of Standardization, Certification and Assurance Services in Global Commerce. Osgoode Hall Law School Research Report No. 12/2008. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1186&context=clpe. Accessed 23 Oct 2015.
10. Blichner, L. C. & Molander, A. (2005). What is juridification? Arena Working Paper No. 14. University of Oslo, Oslo.
11. Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28.
12. Buhmann, K. (2011a). Integrating human rights in emerging regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: The EU case. International Journal of Law in Context, 7(2), 139–179.
13. Buhmann, K. (2011b). The Danish CSR reporting requirement: Migration of CSR-related international norms into companies’ self-regulation through company law? European Company Law, 8(2), 65–73.
14. Buhmann, K. (2012). Business and Human Rights: Analysing Discursive Articulation of Stakeholder Interests to Explain the Consensus-based Construction of the ‘Protect, Respect. Remedy UN Framework’. International Law Research, 1(1), 88–101.
15. Buhmann, K. (2013). The Danish CSR reporting requirement as reflexive law: Employing CSR as a modality to promote public policy. European Business Law Review, 24(2), 187–216.
16. Buhmann, K. (2014). Normative discourses and public-private regulatory strategies for construction of CSR normativity. Copenhagen: Multivers Academic.
17. Buhmann, K. (2015). Business and human rights: Understanding the UN guiding principles from the perspective of transnational business governance interactions. Transnational Legal Theory, 6(1). doi:10.1080/20414005.2015.1073516.
18. Buhmann, K., Morsing, M., & Roseberry, L. (2011). Corporate social and human rights responsibilities: Global legal and management perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. Burke, R. J., Martin, G., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). Corporate reputation: Managing opportunities and threats. London: Ashgate.
20. Byrne, E. F. (2011). Business ethics should study illicit business: To advance respect for human rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 497–509.
21. Cassese, Antonio. (2005). International law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Charney, Jonathan L. (1983). Transnational Corporations and developing public international law. Duke Law Journal, 32, 748–788.
23. Cragg, W. (2012). Ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: A critical look at the justificatory foundations of the UN Framework. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 9–36.
24. Danish Government. (2008). Action plan for corporate social responsibility. Copenhagen: Regeringen.
25. Danish Government. (2012). Responsible growth: Action plan for corporate social responsibility. Copenhagen: Regeringen.
26. Davis, R. & Franks, D. (2014) Costs of Company-Community conflict in the Extractive Sector. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Report No. 66, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
27. De Schutter, O. (2013). Preface. In S. Deva & D. Bilchitz (Eds.), Human rights obligations of business: Beyond the corporate responsibility to respect (pp. 78–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. Deva, S. (2013). Treating human rights lightly: A critique of the consensus rhetoric and the language employed by the guiding principles. In S. Deva & D. Bilchitz (Eds.), Human rights obligations of business: Beyond the corporate responsibility to respect? (pp. 78–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Devinney, T. M., Schwalbach, J., & Williams, C. A. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: Comparative perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 413–419. doi:10.1111/corg.12041.
30. Eberlein, B., Abbott, K. W., Black, J., Meidinger, E., & Wood, S. (2014). Transnational Business Governance Interactions: Conceptualization and framework for analysis. Regulation & Governance, 8(1), 1–21.
31. EU. (2001). Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility’. European Commission, Brussels. EU Doc. COM(2001)366.
32. EU. (2002). Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development. European Commission, Brussels. EU Doc. COM(2002)347.
33. EU. (2011). A renewed EU Strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility. European Commission, Brussels. EU Doc. COM(2011)681.
34. EU. (2013). Press Release: Commission moves to enhance business transparency on social and environmental matters. European Commission, Brussels, 16 April 2013.
35. EU. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2015 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups.
36. Evald, J. (2005). At tænke juridisk (Legal thinking). Copenhagen: Nyt Juridisk Forlag.
37. Fairbrass, J. (2011). Exploring corporate social responsibility policy in the European union: A discursive institutionalist analysis. Journal of European Market Studies, 49(5), 949–970.
38. Fasterling, B., & Demuinck, G. (2013). Human rights in the void? Due diligence in the UN guiding principles on business and human rights. Journal of Business Ethics,. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1822-z.
39. Footer, M. (2012). Shining brightly? Human rights and the responsible sourcing of diamond and gold jewellery from high risk and conflict-affected areas. Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, 6(1), 159–191.
40. Franck, T. M. (1990). The power of legitimacy among nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41. Frankel, C. (2004). Virksomhedens politisering. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
42. Friedmann, W. (1964). The changing structure of international law. London: Stevens & Sons.
43. Gjølberg, M. (2010). Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the “Nordic Model”. Regulation & Governance, 4(2), 203–229.
44. Guldbrandsen, L. (2004). Overlapping public and private governance: Can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime? Global Environmental Politics, 4(2), 75–99.
45. Guldbrandsen, L. (2014). Dynamic governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation & Governance, 8(1), 74–92.
46. Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social License and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance. Law and Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307–341.
47. Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikatives Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
48. Haufler, V. (2001). A public role for the private sector: Industry self-regulation in a global economy. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
49. Hess, D. (2008). The three pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance regulation: Disclosure, dialogue and development. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 447–482.
50. Holmström, S. (2010). Reflective management: Seeing the organization as if from outside. In R. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of Public Relation (pp. 261–276). New York: Sage.
51. Horrigan, B. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility in the twenty-first century: Debates, models and practices across government, law and business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
52. Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. (2012). The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting, Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 11-100.
53. Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394.
54. Jägers, N. (2002). Corporate human rights obligations: In Search of Accountability. Antwerp: Intersentia.
55. Jägers, N. (2012). Regulating the private security industry: Connecting the public and the private through transnational private regulation. Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, 6(1), 56–91.
56. Kell, G., & Ruggie, J. G. (1999). Global Markets and Social Legitimacy: The Case of the ‘Global Compact’, paper presented at York University, Toronto, Canada, 4–6 November 1999.
57. Kennedy, D. (1987). The sources of international law. American University Journal of Law & Policy, 2(1), 1–96.
58. Kinley, D., & Nolan, J. (2007). Trading and aiding human rights in the global economy. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 7(4), 353–377.
59. Knox, J. H. (2008). Horizontal human rights law. American Journal of International Law, 102, 1–47.
60. Knox, J. H. (2012). The Ruggie rules: Applying human rights law to corporations. In R. Mares (Ed.), The UN guiding principles on business and human rights (pp. 51–83). Antwerp: Brill.
61. Knudsen, J. S., & Brown, D. (2014). ‘Why Governments Intervene: Exploring Mixed Motives for Public Policies on CSR’ Public Policy and Administration (April issue).
62. Knudsen, J. S., Moon, J., & Schlager, R. (2015). Government policies for corporate social responsibility in Europe: A comparative analysis of institutionalization. Policy & Politics, 43(1), 81–99.
63. Koh, H. (1997). Why do nations obey international law? (Review essay). The Yale Law Journal, 106(8), 2599–2659.
64. Krisch, N. (2010). Beyond constitutionalism: The pluralist structure of postnational law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Krisch, N., & Benedict, K. (2006). Introduction: Global governance and global administrative law in the international legal order. European Journal of International Law, 17(1), 1–13.
66. Lambooy, T. (2009). Private regulation: Indispensable for responsible corporate conduct in a globalizing world? Law & Globalisation. Saarbrucken: Bocconi School of Law and VDM Publishing.
67. Mares, R. (2006). Institutionalisation of corporate social responsibilities—synergies between the practices of leading multinational enterprises and human rights law/policy. Lund: Faculty of Law, Lund University.
68. Mares, R. (2012a). The UN guiding principles on business and human rights. Antwerp: Brill.
69. Mares, R. (2012b). Business and human rights after Ruggie: Foundations, the art of simplification and the imperative of cumulative progress. In R. Mares (Ed.), The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (pp. 1–50). Antwerp: Brill.
70. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘Explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
71. Mayer, A. E. (2009). Human rights as a dimension of CSR: The blurred lines between legal and non-legal categories. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 561–577.
72. McBarnet, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility beyond law, through law, for law: the new corporate accountability. In D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu, & T. Campbell (Eds.), The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law (pp. 9–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. McCorquedale, R. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and international human rights law. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 385–400.
74. Meidinger, E. (2006). The administrative law of global private-public regulation: The case of forestry. European Journal of International Law, 17(1), 47–87.
75. Moon, J. (2004). Government as a driver of corporate social responsibility. ICCSR Research Paper Series No. 20-2004. University of Nottingham: International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility.
76. Muchlinski, P. T. (2007). Multinational Enterprises and the law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
77. Muchlinski, P. (2012). Implementing the new UN Corporate human rights framework: Implications for corporate law, governance and regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 145–177.
78. Nelsen, J. L. (2006). Social licence to operate. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 20(3), 161–162.
79. OECD (Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development). (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. May 2011, OECD, Paris.
80. Owen, J. R., & Kemp, D. (2013). Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resources Policy, 38, 29–35.
81. Picciotto, S. (2003). Rights, responsibilities and regulation of international business. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42(1), 131–152.
82. Picciotto, S. (2011). Regulating global corporate capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & Society: The link between competitive advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
84. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.
85. Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37, 346–357.
86. Raelin, J. D., & Bondy, K. (2013). Putting the good back in good corporate governance: The presence and problems of double-layered agency theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21, 420–435. doi:10.1111/corg.12038.
87. Rasche, A. (2010). ‘A necessary supplement’: What the United Nations global compact (and is not). Business and Society, 48(4), 511–537.
88. Reich, R. B. (2007). Supercapitalism: The transformation of business, democracy and everyday life. New York: Knopf.
89. Risse, T., & Kleine, M. (2010). Deliberation in negotiations. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(5), 708–726.
90. Ruggie, J. G. (2004). Reconstituting the global public domain—issues, actors and practices. European Journal of International Relations, 10(4), 499–531.
91. Ruggie, J. G. (2007). Business and human rights: the evolving international agenda. American Journal of International Law, 101(4), 819–840.
92. Ruggie, J. (2013). Just business. Boston: Norton Publishers.
93. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.
94. Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4), 315–356.
95. Shelton, D. (2006). International law and ‘Relative Normativity’. In M. D. Evans (Ed.), International law (2nd ed., pp. 159–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
96. Smith, T. (2005). Institutional and social investors find common ground. Journal of Investing, 14(3), 57–65.
97. SRSG. (2007). Summary report: Latin America consultation. Held by the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, Bogota, January 18–19, 2007
98. Steurer, R., & Margula, S. (2009). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments and regional differences. CORE Conference IV: The potential of CSR to support the integration of core EU strategies, Berlin, June 15–16, 2009.
99. Strand, R. (2009). Corporate responsibility in scandinavian supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 179–185.
100. Teubner, G. (1997). ‘Global Bukowina’: Legal pluralism in the world society. In Gunther Teubner (Ed.), Global Law without a State (pp. 1–30). Hants: Dartmouth.
101. Teubner, G. (2000). Contracting worlds: The many autonomies of private law. Social and Legal Studies, 9(3), 399–417.
102. Trubek, D. M. (2004). Human rights, transnational private law litigation and corporate accountability. In C. Joerges, I.-J. Sand, & G. Teubner (Eds.), Transnational governance and constitutionalism (pp. 321–325). Oxford: Hart.
103. UN. (2003). Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights 2003, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2.
104. UN. (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. UN Doc. A/HRC/8/5 (2008), 7 April 2008. United Nations, Geneva.
105. UN. (2011). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect, Remedy’ Framework, UN Doc. A/HRC/17/31, 21 March 2011. United Nations, Geneva.
106. Voiculescu, A. (2011). Challenges and innovation in the legal discourse: Achieving corporate responsibility for human rights. Society and Business Review, 6(3), 278–291.
107. Wettstein, F. (2009). Beyond voluntariness, beyond CSR: Making a case for human rights and justice. Business and Society Review, 114(1), 125–152.
108. Whelan, G., Moon, J., & Orlitzky, M. (2009). Human rights, transnational corporations and embedded liberalism: What chance consensus? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 367–383.
109. Wood, S. (2012). The case for leverage-based corporate human rights responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 63–98.
110. Zahle, H. (1999). Rettens Kilder (Sources of law). Copenhagen: Ejlers.
111. Zahle, H. (2006). Forfatningsret (Constitutional law). Copenhagen: Ejlers.
112. Zumbansen, P. (2012). Transnational law, evolving. In J. Smits (Ed.), Elgar encyclopedia of comparative law (2nd ed., pp. 898–925). Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar.