Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance: Comparative Perspectives

Corporate Governance: An International Review

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 413-419

  Devinney, Timothy M ^a   Schwalbach, Joachim ^a   Williams, Cynthia A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881367051     PISSN: 09648410     EISSN: 14678683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/corg.12041     Document Type: Editorial

References (53)

1. Aguilera, R. V. & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28: 447-465.
2. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C., & Granapathi, J. 2007. Putting the "S" back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32: 836-863.
3. Bainbridge, S. M. 2003. Director primacy: The means and ends of corporate governance. Northwestern University Law Review, 97: 547-606.
4. Becht, M., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. 2009. Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK focus fund. Review of Financial Studies 22: 3093-3129.
5. Berle, A. A., Jr. 1931. Corporate powers as powers in trust. Harvard Law Review, 44: 1049-1074.
6. Blair, M. M., Williams, C. A., & Lin, L.-W. 2008. The new role for assurance services in global commerce. Journal of Corporation Law, 33: 325-360.
7. Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10: 3-28.
8. Calliess, G.-P. & Zumbansen, P. 2010. Rough consensus and running code: A theory of transnational private law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
9. Cappelli, P., Singh, H., Singh, J., & Useem, M. 2010. The India way: Lessons for the US. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24: 6-24.
10. Cashore, B. 2002. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 15: 503-529.
11. Choi, B. B., Lee, D., & Park, Y. 2013. Corporate social responsibility, corporate governance and earnings quality: Evidence from Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 447-467.
12. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92-117.
13. Conglianese, C. & Nash, J. 2006. Leveraging the private sector: Management-based strategies for improving environmental performance. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
14. Conley, J. M. & Williams, C. A. 2011. Global banks as global sustainability regulators? The Equator principles. Law & Policy Review, 33: 542-575.
15. De Graaf, F. J. & Stoelhorst, J. W. 2013. The role of governance in corporate social responsibility: Lessons from Dutch finance. Business and Society, 52: 282-317.
16. Devinney, T. M. 2009. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23: 44-56.
17. Devinney, T. M. 2011. Social responsibility, global strategy, and the multinational enterprise: Global monitory democracy and the meaning of place and space. Global Strategy Journal, 1: 329-344.
18. Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. 2012. Activism on corporate social responsibility. Unpublished Working Paper. London, UK, London Business School.
19. Dodd, E. M. 1932. For whom are corporate managers trustees? Harvard Law Review, 45: 1145-1163.
20. Donaldson, T. & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65-91.
21. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. 2012. The impact of a corporate culture of sustainability on corporate behavior and performance. NBER Working Paper 19750. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
22. Financial Services Authority 2009. The Turner review: A regulatory response to the global banking crisis. London: Financial Services Authority.
23. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Boston, MA: Pitman.
24. Gill, A. 2008. Corporate governance as social responsibility: A research agenda. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 26: 452-478.
25. Gilson, R. J. & Gordon, J. N. 2013. The agency costs of agency capitalism: Activist investors and the revaluation of governance rights. Columbia Law Review, 113: 863-927.
26. Gunningham, N. & Sinclair, D. 1999. Integrative regulation: A principle-based approach to environmental policy. Law & Social Inquiry, 24: 853-896.
27. Gunningham, N. & Sinclair, D. 2009. Organizational trust and the limits of management-based regulation. Law and Society Review, 43: 865-900.
28. Hansmann, H. & Kraakman, R. 2001. The end of history for corporate law. Georgetown Law Journal, 89: 439-479.
29. Hill, J. G. 2005. The persistent debate about convergence in comparative corporate governance. Sydney Law Review, 27: 743-752.
30. Ioannou, I. & Serafeim, G. 2012. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43: 834-864.
31. Johnson, K. L. & de Graaf, F. J. 2011. Modernizing pension fund legal standards for the twenty-first century. In C. A. Williams & P. Zumbansen (Eds.), The embedded firm: Corporate governance, labor, and finance capitalism: 459-473. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Judge, W. 2008. What is the dependent variable in corporate governance research? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: ii.
33. King Committee 1994. King committee report on corporate governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: Institute of Directors.
34. King Committee 2002. King committee reports on corporate governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: Institute of Directors.
35. Mackenzie, C., Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. 2013. Do responsible investment indices improve corporate social responsibility? FTSE4Good's impact on environmental management. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 495-512.
36. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. R. 2007. Does it pay to be good - And does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Unpublished Working Paper. Boston, MA, Harvard Business School.
37. Matten, D. & Moon, J. 2008. Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33: 404-424.
38. May, P. J. 2005. Regulation and compliance motivations: Examining different approaches. Public Administration Review, 65: 31-51.
39. Meidinger, E. 2006. The administrative law of global private-public regulation: The case of forestry. European Journal of International Law, 17: 47-87.
40. Montes, L. 2003. Das Adam Smith Problem: Its origins, the stages of the current debate, and one implication for our understanding of sympathy. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25: 63-90.
41. Ntim, C. G. & Soobaroyen, T. 2013. Corporate governance and performance in socially responsible corporations in South Africa: New empirical insights from a neo-institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 468-494.
42. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24: 403-441.
43. Parker, C. E. 2002. The open corporation: Effective self-regulation and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Parker, C. E. 2007. Meta-regulation: Legal accountability for corporate social responsibility? In D. McBarnet, A. Voiculescu, & T. Campbell (Eds.), The new corporate accountability: Corporate social responsibility and the law: 207-240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Prior, D., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J. A. 2008. Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 160-177.
46. Raelin, J. D. & Bondy, K. 2013. Putting the good back in good corporate governance: The presence and problems of double-layered agency theory. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 420-435.
47. Roe, M. 2000. Political preconditions to separating ownership from corporate control. Stanford Law Review, 5: 539-606.
48. Rupp, D. E. & Williams, C. A. 2011. The efficacy of regulation as a function of psychological fit: Reexamining the hard law/soft law continuum. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 12: 581-602.
49. Sandberg, J. 2013. (Re-)interpreting fiduciary duty to justify socially responsible investment for pension funds? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21: 436-446.
50. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. 2010. Corporate social responsibility: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 463-490.
51. Tyler, T. 1991. Why people obey the law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Williams, C. A. & Conley, J. M. 2005. An emerging third way? The erosion of the Anglo-American value construct. Cornell International Law Journal, 38: 493-553.
53. Williams, C. A. & Conley, J. M. 2007. Triumph or tragedy? The curious path of corporate disclosure reform in the UK. William & Mary Environmental Law Journal, 31: 317-361.