Introduction: Global governance and global administrative law in the international legal order

European Journal of International Law

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-13

  Krisch, Nico ^a   Kingsbury, Benedict ^b  

^a MERTON COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645890269     PISSN: 09385428     EISSN: 14643596     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chi170     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. On the project in general, see www.iilj.org/global_adlaw, and especially the Working Paper series. Other journal symposia of the project include 68:3-4 Law & Contemporary Problems (2005) and 37 NYU Journal of International Law and Politics (2005, forthcoming) available at http://www.iilj.org.
2. For a detailed exposition of global administrative law, see Kingsbury, Krisch and Stewart, 'The Emergence of Global Administrative Law', 68:3 Law & Contemporary Problems (2005) 15.
3. For similar characterizations, see C. Tietje, Internationalisiertes Verwaltungshandeln (2001);
4. S. Battini, Amministrazione senza stato (2003);
5. J. E. Alvarez, International Organizations as Law-makers (2005), at 244-245
6. D. Sarooshi, International Organizations and Their Exercise of Sovereign Powers (2005), at 14-17.
7. See Cassese, 'Global Standards for National Administrative Procedure', 68:3 Law & Contemporary Problems (2005) 109, at 112-113.
8. See Pallis, 'The Operation of UNHCR's Accountability Mechanisms', IILJ Working Paper 2005/12, available at www.iilj.org/papers/ IILJ2005_12Pallis.htm.
9. But see also Benvenisti, 'Exit and Voice in the Age of Globalization', 98 Michigan Law Review (1999) 167.
10. See Salzman, 'Decentralized Administrative Law in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development', 68:3 Law & Contemporary Problems (2005) 189.
11. Barr and Miller, 'Global Administrative Law: The View from Basel', in this issue [15-46].
12. Meidinger, 'The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry', in this issue [47-87].
13. Macdonald and Macdonald, 'Non-Electoral Accountability in Global Politics: Strengthening Democratic Control within the Global Garment Industry', in this issue [89-119].
14. Van Harten and Loughlin, 'Investment meaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law', in this issue [121-150].
15. McCrudden and Gross, 'WTO Government Procurement Rules and the Local Dynamics of Procurement Policies: A Malaysian Case Study', in this issue [151-185].
16. Harlow, 'Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values', in this issue [187-214].
17. Morgan, 'Turning Off the Tap: Urban Water Service Delivery and the Social Construction of Global Administrative Law', in this issue [215-246].
18. Krisch, 'The Pluralism of Global Administrative Law', in this issue [247-278].
19. See Kingsbury, Krisch, and Stewart, supra note 2, at 19-20.
20. See Kingsbury, 'Sovereignty and Inequality', 9 EJIL (1998) 599.
21. See also Weiler, 'The Geology of International Law - Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy', 64 ZaöRV (2004) 547.
22. See also Chimni, 'International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making', 15 EJIL (2004) 1.
23. See also Krisch, 'More Equal Than the Rest? Hierarchy, Equality and US Predominance in International Law', in M. Byers and G. Nolte (eds), United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (2003) 135, at 149-159.
24. See also Chimni, 'Cooption and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative Law', IILJ Working Paper 2005/16, available at www.iilj.org/papers/2005.16Chimni.htm.
25. For an early emphasis on the roots of 'international administrative law' in both domestic public law and international law, see Négulesco, 'Principes du droit international administratif', 51 RdC (1935) 579, at 592-599.
26. See also Alvarez, supra note 3, 588-601.
27. See Kingsbury, 'Omnilateralism and Partial International Communities: Contributions of the Emerging Global Administrative Law', 104 Journal of International Law and Diplomacy (2005) 98.
28. See also Kingsbury, Krisch and Stewart, supra note 2, 29-31.