Human Rights in the Void? Due Diligence in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 116, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 799-814

  Fasterling, Björn ^a   Demuijnck, Geert ^a  

^a EDHEC BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

Author keywords

Corporate responsibility; Human rights; Moral duties; Moral rights; Ruggie Principles

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884818959     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1822-z     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Altschuller, S. A. (2011). Author of UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights Joins Foley Hoag, Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Retrieved April 24, 2012 from http://www. csrandthelaw. com/articles/csr-practice/.
2. Arnold, D. G. (2010). Transnational corporations and the duty to respect basic human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(3), 371-399.
3. Baer, M. H. (2009). Governing corporate compliance. Boston College Law Review, 50(1), 2009; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 166. Retrieved October 14, 2011 from http://ssrn. com/abstract=1474291.
4. Bishop, J. D. (2012). The limits of corporate human rights obligations and the rights of for-profit corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 119-144.
5. Bittle, S., & Snider, L. (2011). Moral panics deflected: The failed legislative response to Canada's safety crimes and markets fraud legislation. Crime, Law and Social Change, 56(4), 373-387.
6. Buchanan, A. (1996). Perfecting imperfect duties: Collective action to create moral obligations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 6(1), 27-42.
7. Business Leaders Initiative on Human Rights (BLIHR). (2009). The guide for integrating human rights into business management. Retrieved March 30, 2012 from http://www. integrating-humanrights. org/.
8. Campbell, T. (1999). Human rights. A culture of controversy. Journal of Law & Society, 26(1), 6-27.
9. Catá Backer, L. (2011). From institutional misalignments to socially sustainable governance: The guiding principles for the implementation of the United Nation's 'Protect, Respect and Remedy' and the construction of inter-systemic global governance. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://ssrn. com/abstract=1922953.
10. Clapham, A. (2010). Human rights obligations of non-state-actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press (reprint).
11. Clapham, A., & Jerbi, S. (2001). Categories of corporate complicity in human rights abuses. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 24, 339-349.
12. Clarkson, C. M. V. (1996). Kicking corporate bodies and damning their souls. Modern Law Review, 59(4), 557-572.
13. Cragg, W. (2012). Ethics, enlightened self-interest, and the corporate responsibility to respect human rights: A critical look at the justificatory foundations of the UN framework. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 9-36.
14. Damodaran, A. (2007). Strategic risk taking: A framework for risk management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Wharton School Publishing.
15. Danish Institute for Human Rights. (2006). Human rights compliance assessment quick check. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://www. humanrights. dk/what+we+do/focus+areas/human+rights+and+business/tools+and+methods/assessment+tools+for+businesses.
16. Dhooge, L. J. (2008). Due diligence as a defense to corporate liability pursuant to the alien tort statute. Emory International Law Review, 22, 456-498.
17. Ferrell, O. C., LeClair, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (1998). The federal sentencing guidelines for organizations: A framework for ethical compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 353-363.
18. Finnis, J. (1980). Natural Law and Natural Rights. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
19. French, P. (1984). Collective and corporate responsibility. New York: Columbia University Press.
20. Hart, H. L. A. (1955). Are there any natural rights? Philosophical Review, 64, 175-191.
21. Heath, J. (2009). The uses and abuses of agency theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(4), 497-528.
22. Human Rights Watch. (2011). UN Human Rights Council: Weak stance on business standards. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://www. hrw. org/news/2011/06/16/un-human-rights-council-weak-stance-business-standards.
23. International Federation for Human Rights. (2011). UN Human Rights Council adopts Guiding Principles on business conduct, yet victims still waiting for effective remedies. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://www. fidh. org/UN-Human-Rights-Council-adopts.
24. Kant, I. (2002). The groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (H. J. Payton, Trans.). In L. Pasternak (Ed.), The groundwork of the metaphysics of morals in focus (pp. 17-98). London: Routledge.
25. Laufer, W. S. (2011). Corporate bodies and guilty minds: The failure of corporate criminal liability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Lea, D. (2004). The imperfect nature of corporate responsibilities to stakeholders. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 201-217.
27. List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. McCorquodale, R. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and international human rights law. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 385-400.
29. Meulbroek, L. K. (2002). Integrated risk management for the firm: A senior manager's guide (February 20, 2002). doi: 10. 2139/ssrn. 301331. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://ssrn. com/abstract=301331.
30. Muchlinski, P. (2012). Implementing the New UN Corporate Human Rights Framework: Implications for corporate law, governance, and regulation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 145-177.
31. Nolan, N., & Taylor, L. (2009). Corporate responsibility for economic, social and cultural rights: Rights in search of a remedy? Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 433-451.
32. O'Neill, O. (1996). Towards justice and virtue: A constructive approach of practical reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Pieth, M., & Ivory, R. (2011). Emergence and convergence: Corporate criminal liability principles in overview. In M. Pieth & R. Ivory (Eds.), Corporate Criminal Liability, Vol. 9 (pp. 3-60). Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. Springer Science + Business Media.
34. Pogge, T. (2002). World poverty and human rights: Cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. Polity Press: Cambridge.
35. Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything: Rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: Demos.
36. Renouard, C. (2007). La responsabilité éthique des multinationales. Paris: PUF.
37. Ruggie, J. G. (2007). Business and human rights: The evolving agenda. American Journal of International Law, 101, 819-840.
38. Ruggie, J. G. (2011). Lecture, Sir Geoffrey Chandler Speaker Series, The Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufacturers and Commerce, 11 January 2011. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www. ohchr. org/Documents/Press/ChandlerLecture_Final. pdf).
39. Sherman, J., & Lehr, A. (2010). Human rights due diligence: Is it too risky? Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No. 55. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://www. hks. harvard. edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_55_shermanlehr. pdf.
40. Shue, H. (1996). Basic rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Special Representative of the U. N. Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (SRSG). (2008). Protect, respect and remedy: A framework for business and human rights. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, 20, 74, U. N. Doc. A/HRC/8/5 (April 7, 2008).
42. Spedding, L., & Rose, A. (2008). Business risk management handbook: A sustainable approach. Oxford: Elsevier.
43. Stemplowska, Z. (2009). On the real world duties imposed on US by human rights. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(4), 466-487.
44. Taylor, M. B., Zandvliet, L., & Forouhar, M. (2009). Due diligence for human rights: a risk-based approach. Working Paper No. 53, Harvard Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://www. hks. harvard. edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_53_taylor_etal. pdf.
45. United Nations, High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2010). Principled pragmatism: The way forward for business and human rights. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://www. ohchr. org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/PrincipledpragmatismBusinessHR. aspx.
46. United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2009). Promotion of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the rights to development. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, A/HRC/11/13. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www2. ohchr. org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/11session/A. HRC. 11. 13. pdf.
47. United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2010). Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the impact of the global economic and financial crises on the realization of all human rights and on possible actions to alleviate it, A/HRC/13/38. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www2. ohchr. org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/13session/A-HRC-13-38. pdf.
48. United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2011a). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations 'Protect, Respect and Remedy' Framework'. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, A/HRC/17/31. Retrieved January 15, 2012 from http://www. business-humanrights. org/media/documents/ruggie/ruggie-guiding-principles-21-mar-2011. pdf.
49. United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC). (2011b). Human rights and corporate law: trends and observations from a cross-national study by the Special Representative. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie, A/HRC/17/31/Add. 1. Retrieved March 18, 2012 from http://www. business-humanrights. org/media/documents/ruggie/report-human-rights-and-corporate-law-23-may-2011. pdf.
50. Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights Initiative. (2012). Implementation guidance tools. Retrieved November 30, 2012 from http://www. voluntaryprinciples. org/files/VPs_IGT_Final_13-09-11. pdf.
51. Wenar, L. (2011). 'Rights', The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved April 24, 2012 from http://plato. stanford. edu/archives/fall2011/entries/rights/.
52. Wettstein, F. (2010). The duty to protect: Corporate complicity, political responsibility, and human rights advocacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(1), 33-47.
53. Wettstein, F. (2012). Silence as complicity: Elements of a corporate duty to speak out against the violation of human rights. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 37-61.
54. Wettstein, F., & Waddock, S. (2005). Voluntary or mandatory: That is (not) the question-Linking corporate citizenship to human rights obligations for business. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts und Unternehmensethik, 6(3), 304-320.
55. Williams, B. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. In J. Smart & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against (pp. 77-150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Williamson, H. (2011). Conflict zone pressure rises on corporations. In Financial Times, 12 January 2012. Retrieved April 25, 2012 from http://www. ft. com/cms/s/0/d4530e7a-1e45-11e0-bab6-00144feab49a. html#axzz1t4BRsGM0.
57. Wood, S. (2012). The case for leverage-based corporate human rights responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(1), 63-98.