ENCORE: Software for Quantitative Ensemble Comparison

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Tiberti, Matteo ^a,b   Papaleo, Elena ^b   Bengtsen, Tone ^b   Boomsma, Wouter ^b   Lindorff Larsen, Kresten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEINS;

BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; CONFORMATIONAL CHANGE; CONFORMATIONAL ENSEMBLE; DYNAMIC CHANGES; DYNAMICAL HETEROGENEITIES; DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS ENSEMBLE; PROTEIN DYNAMICS; PROTEIN FUNCTIONS; ROOT-MEAN-SQUARE DEVIATIONS;

PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

UBIQUITIN; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN DOMAIN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE VALIDATION; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE VALIDATION;

EID: 84946084630     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004415     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Lindorff-Larsen K, Best RB, Depristo MA, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M, (2005) Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature 433: 128–132. 15650731
2. Furnham N, Blundell TL, DePristo MA, Terwilliger TC, (2006) Is one solution good enough? Nat Struct Mol Biol 13: 184–185 16518382
3. Woldeyes RA, Sivak DA, Fraser JS, (2014) E pluribus unum, no more: from one crystal, many conformations. Curr Opin Struct Biol 28C: 56–62.
4. Sierk ML, Pearson WR, (2004) Sensitivity and selectivity in protein structure comparison. Protein Sci 13: 773–785. 14978311
5. Brüschweiler R, (2003) Efficient RMSD measures for the comparison of two molecular ensembles. Root-mean-square deviation. Proteins 50: 26–34. 12471596
6. Lindorff-Larsen K, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, (2009) Similarity measures for protein ensembles. PLoS One 4: e4203. A doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004203 19145244
7. Wolfe KC, Chirikjian GS, (2012) Quantitative Comparison of Conformational Ensembles. Entropy 14: 213–232.
8. Damas JM, Filipe LCS, Campos SRR, Lousa D, Victor BL, et al. (2013) Predicting the Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Helix Formation in a Cyclic Peptide Model. J Chem Theory Comput 9: 5148–5157.
9. Xiang S, Gapsys V, Kim H-Y, Bessonov S, Hsiao H-H, et al. (2013) Phosphorylation drives a dynamic switch in serine/arginine-rich proteins. Structure 21: 2162–2174. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.09.014 24183573
10. Yang S, Salmon L, Al-Hashimi HM, (2014) Measuring similarity between dynamic ensembles of biomolecules. Nat Methods 11: 552–554. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2921 24705474
11. McClendon CL, Hua L, Barreiro A, Jacobson MP, (2012) Comparing Conformational Ensembles Using the Kullback-Leibler Divergence Expansion. J Chem Theory Comput 8: 2115–2126. 23316121
12. Malmendal A, Underhaug J, Otzen DE, Nielsen NC, (2010) Fast mapping of global protein folding states by multivariate NMR: a GPS for proteins. PLoS One 5: e10262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010262 20421996
13. Hura GL, Budworth H, Dyer KN, Rambo RP, Hammel M, et al. (2013) Comprehensive macromolecular conformations mapped by quantitative SAXS analyses. Nat Methods 10: 453–454. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2453 23624664
14. Michaud-Agrawal N, Denning EJ, Woolf TB, Beckstein O, (2011) MDAnalysis: A toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 32:2319–2327. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21787 21500218
15. Lindorff-Larsen K, Maragakis P, Piana S, Eastwood MP, Dror RO, et al. (2012) Systematic validation of protein force fields against experimental data. PLoS One 7: e32131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032131 22384157
16. Fenwick RB, Esteban-Martín S, Richter B, Lee D, Walter KFA, et al. (2011) Weak long-range correlated motions in a surface patch of ubiquitin involved in molecular recognition. J Am Chem Soc 133: 10336–10339. doi: 10.1021/ja200461n 21634390
17. Shaw DE, Maragakis P, Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, et al. (2010) Atomic-level characterization of the structural dynamics of proteins. Science 330: 341–346. doi: 10.1126/science.1187409 20947758
18. Behnel S, Bradshaw R, Citro C, Dalcin L, Seljebotn DS, et al. (2010) Cython: The best of both the worlds. Comput Sci Eng 13: 31–39.
19. Frey BJ, Dueck D, (2007) Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315: 972–976. 17218491
20. Agrafiotis DK, Xu H, (2002) A self-organizing principle for learning nonlinear manifolds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 15869–15872. 12444256
21. Shieh AD, Hashimoto TB, Airoldi EM, (2011) Tree preserving embedding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 16916–16921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018393108 21949369
22. Levitt M, (1983) Molecular dynamics of native protein. II. Analysis and nature of motion. J Mol Biol 168: 621–657. 6193282
23. Lindorff-Larsen K, Røgen P, Paci E, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM, (2005) Protein folding and the organization of the protein topology universe. Trends Biochem Sci 30: 13–19. 15653321
24. Qian H, (2001) Relative entropy: Free energy associated with equilibrium fluctuations and nonequilibrium deviations. Phys Rev E 63: 042103.
25. Wall ME, Clemente-Gallardo J, Moreno Y, Lorenzo JFS, Velazquez-Campoy A, (2006) Ligand binding, protein fluctuations, and allosteric free energy. New York, USA Am Inst Physics: 16–33.
26. Martín-García F, Papaleo E, Gomez-Puertas P, Boomsma W, Lindorff-Larsen K, (2015) Comparing MD force-fields in the essential subspace. PLoS One 10: e0121114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121114 25811178
27. Hess B, (2002) Convergence of sampling in protein simulations. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 65: 031910. 11909112
28. Genheden S, Ryde U, (2012) Will molecular dynamics simulations of proteins ever reach equilibrium? Phys Chem Chem Phys. 14: 8662–8677. doi: 10.1039/c2cp23961b 22614001
29. Mobley DL, (2012) Let’s get honest about sampling. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26: 93–95. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9497-y 22113833
30. De Groot BL, van Aalten DM, Amadei A, Berendsen HJ, (1996) The consistency of large concerted motions in proteins in molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 71: 1707–1713. 8889148
31. Kuriyan J, Osapay K, Burley SK, Brünger AT, Hendrickson WA, et al. (1991) Exploration of disorder in protein structures by X-ray restrained molecular dynamics. Proteins 10: 340–358. 1946343
32. Torda A, Scheek R, Gunsteren W Van, (1989) Time-dependent distance restraints in molecular dynamics simulations. Chem Phys Lett 157: 289–294.
33. Olsson S, Frellsen J, Boomsma W, Mardia K V, Hamelryck T, (2013) Inference of structure ensembles of flexible biomolecules from sparse, averaged data. PLoS One 8: e79439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079439 24244505
34. Beauchamp KA, Pande VS, Das R, (2014) Bayesian energy landscape tilting: towards concordant models of molecular ensembles. Biophys J 106: 1381–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.009 24655513
35. Pitera JW, Chodera JD, (2012) On the Use of Experimental Observations to Bias Simulated Ensembles. J Chem Theory Comput 8: 3445–3451.
36. Roux B, Weare J, (2013) On the statistical equivalence of restrained-ensemble simulations with the maximum entropy method. J Chem Phys 138: 084107. doi: 10.1063/1.4792208 23464140
37. Cavalli A, Camilloni C, Vendruscolo M, (2013) Molecular dynamics simulations with replica-averaged structural restraints generate structural ensembles according to the maximum entropy principle. J Chem Phys 138: 094112. doi: 10.1063/1.4793625 23485282
38. Boomsma W, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, Lindorff-Larsen K, (2014) Combining experiments and simulations using the maximum entropy principle. PLoS Comput Biol 10: e1003406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003406 24586124
39. Best RB, Lindorff-Larsen K, DePristo MA, Vendruscolo M, (2006) Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 10901–10906. 16829580
40. Lange OF, Lakomek N-A, Farès C, Schröder GF, Walter KFA, et al. (2008) Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 320: 1471–1475. doi: 10.1126/science.1157092 18556554
41. Richter B, Gsponer J, Várnai P, Salvatella X, Vendruscolo M, (2007) The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins. J Biomol NMR 37: 117–135. 17225069
42. Montalvao RW, De Simone A, Vendruscolo M, (2012) Determination of structural fluctuations of proteins from structure-based calculations of residual dipolar couplings. J Biomol NMR 53: 281–292. doi: 10.1007/s10858-012-9644-3 22729708
43. Maltsev AS, Grishaev A, Roche J, Zasloff M, Bax A, (2014) Improved cross validation of a static ubiquitin structure derived from high precision residual dipolar couplings measured in a drug-based liquid crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 136: 3752–3755. doi: 10.1021/ja4132642 24568736
44. Das P, Moll M, Stamati H, Kavraki LE, Clementi C, (2006) Low-dimensional, free-energy landscapes of protein-folding reactions by nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 9885–9890. 16785435
45. Harder T, Borg M, Boomsma W, Røgen P, Hamelryck T, (2012) Fast large-scale clustering of protein structures using Gauss integrals. Bioinformatics 28: 510–515. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr692 22199383
46. Hirsch M, Habeck M, (2008) Mixture models for protein structure ensembles. Bioinformatics 24: 2184–2192. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn396 18662925
47. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Dror RO, Shaw DE, (2011) How fast-folding proteins fold. Science 334: 517–520. doi: 10.1126/science.1208351 22034434
48. Chodera JD, Noé F, (2014) Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 25: 135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 24836551
49. Voelz VA, Elman B, Razavi AM, Zhou G, (2014) Surprisal Metrics for Quantifying Perturbed Conformational Dynamics in Markov State Models. J Chem Theory Comput 10: 5716–5728.