Inference of structure ensembles of flexible biomolecules from sparse, averaged data

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 11, 2013, Pages

  Olsson, Simon ^a   Frellsen, Jes ^a   Boomsma, Wouter ^a   Mardia, Kanti V ^b   Hamelryck, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOPHYSICS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENTROPY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84892429799     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079439     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Brünger AT, Nilges M (1993) Computational challenges for macromolecular structure determination by X-ray crystallography and solution NMR spectroscopy. Q Rev Biophys 26: 49-125.
2. Jardetzky O (1980) On the nature of molecular conformations inferred from highresolution NMR. Biochim Biophys Acta 621: 227-232.
3. Jack A, Levitt M (1978) Refinement of large structures by simultaneous minimization of energy and R factor. Acta Crystallogr A 34: 931-935.
4. Rieping W, Habeck M, Nilges M (2005) Inferential structure determination. Science 309: 303-306.
5. Habeck M (2011) Statistical mechanics analysis of sparse data. J Struct Biol 173: 541-548.
6. Torda AE, Scheek RM, van Gunsteren WF (1989) Time-dependent distance restraints in molecular dynamics simulations. Chem Phys Lett 157: 289-294.
7. Torda AE, Scheek RM, van Gunsteren WF (1990) Time-averaged nuclear overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat. J Mol Biol 214: 223-235.
8. Lindorff-Larsen K, Kristjansdottir S, Teilum K, Fieber W, Dobson CM, et al. (2004) Determination of an ensemble of structures representing the denatured state of the bovine acyl-coenzyme a binding protein. J Am Chem Soc 126: 3291-3299.
9. Kim Y, Prestegard JH (1989) A dynamic model for the structure of acyl carrier protein in solution. Biochemistry 28: 8792-7.
10. Teilum K, Olsen JG, Kragelund BB (2011) Protein stability, flexibility and function. Biochim Biophys Acta 1814: 969-976.
11. Jha AK, Colubri A, Freed KF, Sosnick TR (2005) Statistical coil model of the unfolded state: Resolving the reconciliation problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 13099-13104.
12. Bernadó P, Blanchard L, Timmins P, Marion D, Ruigrok RWH, et al. (2005) A structural model for unfolded proteins from residual dipolar couplings and small-angle x-ray scattering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 17002-17007.
13. Chen Y, Campbell SL, Dokholyan NV (2007) Deciphering protein dynamics from NMR data using explicit structure sampling and selection. Biophys J 93: 2300-2306.
14. Nodet G, Salmon L, Ozenne V, Meier S, Jensen MR, et al. (2009) Quantitative description of backbone conformational sampling of unfolded proteins at amino acid resolution from NMR residual dipolar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 131: 17908-17918.
15. Bertini I, Giachetti A, Luchinat C, Parigi G, Petoukhov MV, et al. (2010) Conformational space of flexible biological macromolecules from average data. J Am Chem Soc 132: 13553-13558.
16. Fisher CK, Huang A, Stultz CM (2010) Modeling intrinsically disordered proteins with bayesian statistics. J Am Chem Soc 132: 14919-14927.
17. Guerry P, Salmon L, Mollica L, Ortega Roldan JL, Markwick P, et al. (2013) Mapping the population of protein conformational energy sub-states from NMR dipolar couplings. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52: 3181-3185.
18. Wang L, Donald BR (2006) A data-driven, systematic search algorithm for structure determination of denatured or disordered proteins. Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf : 67-78.
19. Shehu A, Clementi C, Kavraki LE (2006) Modeling protein conformational ensembles: from missing loops to equilibrium fluctuations. Proteins 65: 164-79.
20. Donald BR (2011) Algorithms in Structural Molecular Biology. The MIT Press.
21. Kemmink J, van Mierlo CP, Scheek RM, Creighton TE (1993) Local structure due to an aromatic-amide interaction observed by 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in peptides related to the N terminus of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J Mol Biol 230: 312-322.
22. Lindorff-Larsen K, Best RB, DePristo MA, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M (2005) Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature 433: 128-132.
23. Lange OF, Lakomek NA, Farès C, Schröder GF,Walter KFA, et al. (2008) Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 320: 1471-5.
24. Groth M, Malicka J, Czaplewski C, O ldziej S, Lankiewicz L, et al. (1999) Maximum entropy approach to the determination of solution conformation of flexible polypeptides by global conformational analysis and NMR spectroscopy-application to DNS1-c-[DA2, bu2,Trp4,Leu5]enkephalin and DNS1-c-[D-A2bu2, Trp4,D-Leu5]enkephalin. J Biomol NMR 15: 315-30.
25. Dedmon MM, Lindorff-Larsen K, Christodoulou J, Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM (2005) Mapping long-range interactions in a-synuclein using spin-label NMR and ensemble molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 127: 476-477.
26. Bonvin AMJJ, Boelens R, Kaptein R (1994) Time- and ensemble-averaged direct NOE restraints. J Biomol NMR 4: 143-149.
27. Pitera JW, Chodera JD (2012) On the use of experimental observations to bias simulated ensembles. J Chem Theory Comput 8: 3445.
28. Cavalli A, Camilloni C, Vendruscolo M (2013) Molecular dynamics simulations with replica-averaged structural restraints generate structural ensembles according to the maximum entropy principle. J Chem Phys 138: 094112.
29. Roux B, Weare J (2013) On the statistical equivalence of restrained-ensemble simulations with the maximum entropy method. J Chem Phys 138: 084107.
30. Irbäck A, Mitternacht S, Mohanty S (2009) An effective all-atom potential for proteins. PMC Biophys 2: 2.
31. Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ, III AGP, Skelton NJ, Rance M (2006) Protein NMR Spectroscopy: Principles And Practice. Academic Press, 2 edition.
32. Diaconis P, Zabell SL (1982) Updating subjective probability. J Am Statist Assoc 77: 822-830.
33. Hamelryck T, Borg M, Paluszewski M, Paulsen J, Frellsen J, et al. (2010) Potentials of mean force for protein structure prediction vindicated, formalized and generalized. PLoS One 5: e13714.
34. Hamelryck T, Mardia K, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, editors (2012) Bayesian Methods in Structural Bioinformatics. Springer.
35. Kullback S (1968) Information Theory and Statistics. Dover.
36. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall, London, 2 edition.
37. Gronenborn AM, Clore G (1985) Investigation of the solution structures of short nucleic acid fragments by means of nuclear overhauser enhancement measurements. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 17: 1-32.
38. Rieping W, Habeck M, Nilges M (2005) Modeling errors in NOE data with a log-normal distribution improves the quality of NMR structures. J Am Chem Soc 127: 16026-16027.
39. Jaynes E (2003) Probability theory: The logic of science. Cambridge.
40. Habeck M, Rieping W, Nilges M (2006) Weighting of experimental evidence in macromolecular structure determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 1756-1761.
41. Boomsma W, Mardia KV, Taylor CC, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, Krogh A, et al. (2008) A generative, probabilistic model of local protein structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 8932-8937.
42. Harder T, Boomsma W, Paluszewski M, Frellsen J, Johansson KE, et al. (2010) Beyond rotamers: a generative, probabilistic model of side chains in proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 306.
43. Olsson S, Boomsma W, Frellsen J, Bottaro S, Harder T, et al. (2011) Generative probabilistic models extend the scope of inferential structure determination. J Magn Reson 213: 182-186.
44. Nilges M, O'Donoghue SI (1998) Ambiguous NOEs and automated NOE assignment. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 32: 107-139.
45. Engh RA, Huber R (1991) Accurate bond and angle parameters for x-ray protein structure refinement. Acta Cryst A47: 392-400.
46. Tropp J (1980) Dipolar relaxation and nuclear Overhauser effects in nonrigid molecules: The effect of fluctuating internuclear distances. J Chem Phys 72: 6035-6043.
47. Boomsma W, Frellsen J, Harder T, Bottaro S, Johansson K, et al. (2013) PHAISTOS: A framework for Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation and inference of protein structure. J Comp Chem 34: 1697-1705.