Mixture models for protein structure ensembles

Bioinformatics

Volumn 24, Issue 19, 2008, Pages 2184-2192

  Hirsch, Michael ^a   Habeck, Michael ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALMODULIN; GLOBULAR PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENTROPY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICS;

EID: 52949143542     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn396     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andrec,M. et al. (2007) A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: Statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform., 69, 449-465.
2. Arnold,G.E. and Omstein,R.L. (1997) Molecular dynamics study of time-correlated protein domain motions and molecular flexibility: cytochrome P450BM-3. Biophys. J., 73, 1147-1159.
3. Bishop,C. (1995) Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
4. Dempster,A.P. et al. (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 39, 1-38.
5. Furnham,N. et al. (2006) Is one solution good enough? Nat. Struct. Biol., 13, 184-185.
6. Gerstein,M. et al. (1994) Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. Biochemistry, 33, 6739-6749.
7. Havel,T.F. and Wüthrich,K. (1985) An evaluation of the combined use of nuclear magnetic resonance and distance geometry for the determination of protein conformations in solution. J. Mol. Biol., 182, 281-294.
8. Higham,N.J. (1989) Matrix nearness problems and applications. In Gover,M.J.C. and Barnett,S. (eds) Applications of Matrix Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 1-27.
9. Kabsch,W. (1976) A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Cryst., A32, 922-923.
10. Kelley,L.A. et al. (1996) An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. Protein Eng., 9, 1063-1065.
11. Kelley,L.A. et al. (1997) An automated approach for defining core atoms and domains in an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures. Protein Eng., 10, 737-741.
12. Kuboniwa,H. et al. (1995) Solution structure of calcium-free calmodulin. Nat. Struct. Biol., 2, 768-776.
13. MacKay,D.J.C. (2003) Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. Markley,J.L. et al. (1998) Recommendations for the presentation of NMR structures of proteins and nucleic acids. J. Mol. Biol., 280, 933-952.
15. Painter,J. and Merritt, E.A. (2006) Optimal description of a protein structure in terms of multiple groups undergoing TTS motion. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 62, 439-450.
16. Rasmussen,C.E. (2000) The infinite gaussian mixture model. In Solla,S.A.T.K. and Müller,K.R. (eds) NIPS 12. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 554-560.
17. Rieping,W. et al. (2005) Inferential structure determination. Science, 309, 303-306.
18. Snyder,D.A. and Montelione,GT. (2005) Clustering algorithms for identifying core atom sets and for assessing the precision of protein structure ensembles. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 59, 673-686.
19. Snyder,D.A. et al. (2005) Assessing precision and accuracy of protein structures derived from NMR data. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 59, 655-661.
20. Spronk,A.E.M. et al. (2003) The precision of NMR structure ensembles revisited. J. Biomol. NMR, 25, 225-234.
21. Stone,M. (1974) Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 36, 111-147.
22. Sutcliffe,M.J. (1993) Representing an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures by a single structure. Protein Sci., 2, 936-944.
23. Theobald,D.L. and Wuttke,D.S. (2006a) Empirical Bayes hierarchical models for regularizing maximum likelihood estimation in the matrix Gaussian procrustes problem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 18521-18527.
24. Theobald,D.L. and Wuttke,D.S. (2006b) THESEUS: Maximum likelihood superpositioning and analysis of macromolecular structures. Bioinformatics, 22, 2171-2172.
25. Titterington,D.M. et al. (1985) Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions. Wiley, New York.
26. Vonrhein,C. et al. (1995) Movie of the structural changes during a catalytic cycle of nucleoside monophosphate kmases. Structure, 3, 483-490.
27. Whitford,P.C. et al. (2008) Conformational transitions in adenylate kinase. Allosteric communication reduces misligation. J. Biol. Chem., 283, 2042-2048.
28. Wüthrich,K. (1986) NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. John Wiley, New York.