How does glance behavior influence crash and injury risk? A 'what-if' counterfactual simulation using crashes and near-crashes from SHRP2

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 152-169

  Bärgman, Jonas ^a   Lisovskaja, Vera ^a   Victor, Trent ^a,b   Flannagan, Carol ^c   Dozza, Marco ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b VOLVO CAR CORPORATION   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

ADAS evaluation; Driver vehicle interface; Eyes off road; HMI; Lead vehicle; Secondary task

Indexed keywords

CRASHWORTHINESS; OFF ROAD VEHICLES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION; RISKS; ROADS AND STREETS; TRANSPORTATION; TUNING; VEHICLES;

ADAS EVALUATION; DRIVER-VEHICLE INTERFACES; EYES-OFF-ROAD; HMI; LEAD VEHICLES; SECONDARY TASKS;

ACCIDENTS;

EID: 84945892159     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alliance. (2006). Statement of principles, criteria and verification procedures on driver interactions with advanced in-vehicle information and communication systems: Including 2006 updated sections. Washington, DC: Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers: Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group < http://www.autoalliance.org/index.cfm?objectid=D6819130-B985-11E1-9E4C000C296BA163 >.
2. Bärgman, J., Werneke, J., Boda, C. -N., Engström, J., & Smith, K. (2013). Using manual measurements on event recorder video and image processing algorithms to extract optical parameters and range. In Proceedings of the seventh international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design (pp. 177-183), Bolton Landing, N.Y. < http://drivingassessment.uiowa.edu/sites/default/files/DA2013/Papers/028-Bargman-0.pdf >.
3. Benmimoun, M., Ljung Aust, M., Faber, F., & Saint Pierre, G. (2011). Safety analysis method for assessing the impacts of advanced driver assistance systems within the European large scale field test "euroFOT". Paper presented at the ITS European Congress. Lyon, France < http://www.eurofot-ip.eu/download/papersandpresentations/its-european-congress/mohamed-benmimoun.pdf >.
4. G.A. Davis, J. Hourdos, H. Xiong, and I. Chatterjee Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes Accident Analysis and Prevention 43 6 2011 1907 1919 10.1016/j.aap.2011.05.001
5. Dingus, T. A., Klauer, S. G., Neale, V. L., Petersen, A., Lee, S. E., Sudweeks, J., Jermeland, J. (2006). The 100-car naturalistic driving study, Phase II - results of the 100-car field experiment. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Contract No. DTNH22-00-C-07007.
6. EC. (2013). Road safety: EU reports lowest ever number of road deaths and takes first step towards an injuries strategy [Press release]. European Commision. Retrieved from < http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release-IP-13-236-en.html >.
7. R. Elvik, A. Hoye, T. Vaa, and M. Sorensen The handbook of road safety measures 2nd ed. 2009 Emerald Group Publishing Limited Bingley, UK
8. Engström, J., Monk, C. A., Hanowski, R. J., Horrey, W. J., Lee, J. D., McGehee, D. V.,..., Yang, D. (2013a). A conceptual framework and taxonomy for understanding and categorizing driver inattention. US-EU ITS Cooperation, Driver Distraction and HMI Working Group < http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/us-eu-inattention-taxonomy-report >.
9. Engström, J., Werneke, J., Bärgman, J., Nguyen, N., & Cook, B. (2013b). Analysis of the role of inattention in road crashes based on naturalistic on-board safety monitoring data. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on driver distraction & inattention, Göteborg, Sweden < http://document.chalmers.se/download?docid=f3644f5c-4f33-45bb-ad19-88c7e5538a8b >.
10. Erbsmehl, C. (2009). Simulation of real crashes as a method for estimating the potential benefits of advanced safety technologies. In Proceedings of the 21st international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Stuttgart, Germany. Paper num. 09-0162.
11. C. Farmer, S.G. Klauer, J. McClafferty, and F. Guo Secondary behavior of drivers on cell phones 2014 Insurance institute for highway safety Arlington, VA
12. G.M. Fitch, R.J. Hanowski, and F. Guo The risk of a safety-critical event associated with mobile device use in specific driving contexts Traffic Injury Prevention 1 2014 1 34 10.1080/15389588.2014.923566
13. Funke, J., Srinivasan, G., Ranganathan, R., & Burgett, A. (2011). Safety impact methodology (SIM): Application and results of the advanced crash avoidance technologies (ACAT) program. In Proceedings of the 22nd international technical conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Washington, D.C. Paper num. 11-0367-O.
14. T.A. Gennarelli, and E. Wodzin AIS 2005: A contemporary injury scale Injury 37 12 2006 1083 1091 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.009
15. D. Gettman, and L. Head Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1840 1 2003 104 115 10.3141/1840-12
16. Green, P. (2004). Driver distraction, telematics design, and workload managers: Safety issues and solutions. In Paper presented at the convergence international congress & exposition on transportation electronics. Paper num 2004-21-0022.
17. F. Guo, and Y. Fang Individual driver risk assessment using naturalistic driving data Accident Analysis and Prevention 61 2013 3 9 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.014
18. F. Guo, S. Klauer, M. McGill, and T. Dingus Evaluating the relationship between near-crashes and crashes: Can near-crashes serve as a surrogate safety metric for crashes? 2010 US-DOT Blacksburg, VA
19. Hickman, J. S., Hanowski, R. J., & Bocanegra, J. (2010). Distraction in commercial trucks and buses: Assessing prevalence and risk in conjunction with crashes and near-crashes. Washington, DC: FMCSA. Contract No. DTMC75-09-J-00045.
20. Hydén, C. (1987). The development of a method for traffic safety evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique. Lund, Sweden: Lund University, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering. Bulletin 70. B0007B9WR4.
21. Klauer, S. G., Dingus, T. A., Neale, V. L., Sudweeks, J. D., & Ramsey, D. J. (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 810 594.
22. Klauer, S. G., Guo, F., Sudweeks, J., & Dingus, T. A. (2010). An analysis of driver inattention using a case-crossover approach on 100-car data: Final report. Washington DC: Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 811 334.
23. S.G. Klauer, F. Guo, B.G. Simons-Morton, M.C. Ouimet, S.E. Lee, and T.A. Dingus Distracted driving and risk of road crashes among novice and experienced drivers New England Journal of Medicine 370 1 2014 54 59 10.1056/NEJMsa1204142
24. Kusano, K., & Gabler, H. (2010). Target population for injury reduction from pre-crash systems. SAE Technical Paper. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-0463 [2010-01-0463].
25. D. Lamble, T. Kauranen, M. Laakso, and H. Summala Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: Safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving Accident Analysis and Prevention 31 6 1999 617 623 10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00018-4
26. LeBlanc, D., Sayer, J., Winkler, C., Ervin, R., Bogard, S., Devonshire, J., Gordon, T. (2006). Road departure crash warning system field operational test: Methodology and results. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. UMTRI-2006-9-1.
27. G. Markkula, O. Benderius, K. Wolff, and M. Wahde A review of near-collision driver behavior models Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54 6 2012 1117 1143
28. S. McLaughlin, J. Hankey, and T. Dingus A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data Accident Analysis and Prevention 40 2008 8 16 10.1016/j.aap.2007.03.016
29. Migletz, D., Glauz, W., & Bauer, K. (1985). Relationships between traffic conflicts and accidents. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. FHWA/RD-84/042.
30. E. Muhrer, and M. Vollrath The effect of visual and cognitive distraction on driver's anticipation in a simulated car following scenario Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 14 6 2011 555 566 10.1016/j.trf.2011.06.003
31. Najm, W., & Smith, D. L. (2004). Modeling driver response to lead vehicle decelerating. In Proceedings of the SAE 2004 world congress & exhibition, Detroit, MI. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0171.
32. D.M. Neyens, and L.N. Boyle The effect of distractions on the crash types of teenage drivers Accident Analysis and Prevention 39 1 2007 206 212 10.1016/j.aap.2006.07.004
33. NHTSA. (2013). Visual-manual NHTSA driver distraction guidelines for in-vehicle electronic devices (NHTSA-2010-0053). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation - National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
34. C.J.D. Patten, A. Kircher, J. Östlund, and L. Nilsson Using mobile telephones: Cognitive workload and attention resource allocation Accident Analysis and Prevention 36 3 2004 341 350
35. Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Dobres, J., McAnulty, H., Mehler, A., Munger, D., & Rumpold, A. (2014). Effects of an 'Expert Mode' voice command system on task performance, glance behavior & driver physiology. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 1-9), Seattle, WA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2667317.2667320.
36. B. Reimer, and B. Mehler The effects of a production level "Voice-Command" interface on driver behavior: Summary findings on reported workload, physiology, visual attention, and driving performance 2013 MIT Agelab Cambridge, MA 2013-18A
37. T.H. Rockwell Spare visual capacity in driving-revisited: New empirical results for an old idea A.G. Gale, M.H. Freeman, C.M. Haslegrave, P. Smith, S.P. Taylor, Proceedings of the second international conference on vision in vehicles 1988 Nottingham UK 317 324
38. SHRP2. (2010). Researcher dictionary for video reduction data, v2.1. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.
39. H. Summala Risk control is not risk adjustment: The zero-risk theory of driver behaviour and its implications Ergonomics 31 4 1988 491 506 10.1080/00140138808966694
40. H. Summala Towards understanding motivational and emotional factors in driver behavior: Comfort through satisficing C.P. Cacciabue, Modelling driver behavior in automotive environments 2007 Springer London, UK 189 207
41. Å. Svensson, and C. Hydén Estimating the severity of safety related behavior Accident Analysis and Prevention 38 2006 379 385
42. A.P. Tarko Use of crash surrogates and exceedance statistics to estimate road safety Accident Analysis and Prevention 45 2012 230 240 10.1016/j.aap.2011.07.008
43. Tijerina, L., Barickman, F. S., & Mazzae, E. N. (2004). Driver eye glance behavior during car following. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 809 723.
44. Tingvall, C., & Haworth, N. (1999). Vision zero - an ethical approach to safety and mobility. In Paper presented at the 6th ITE international conference on road safety & traffic enforcement: Beyond 2000, Melbourne, Australia.
45. Tingvall, C., Ifver, J., Krafft, M., Kullgren, A., Lie, A., Rizzi, M.,..., Strandroth, J. (2013). The consequences of adopting a MAIS 3 injury target for road safety in the EU: A comparison with targets based on fatalities and long-term consequences. In Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI), Göteborg, Sweden. Retrieved from < http://www.ircobi.org/downloads/irc13/default.htm >.
46. E. Tivesten, and M. Dozza Driving context and visual-manual phone tasks influence glance behavior in naturalistic driving Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 26 Part A (0) 2014 258 272 10.1016/j.trf.2014.08.004
47. E. Tivesten, and M. Dozza Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study Journal of Safety Research 53 2015 87 96 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.010
48. TRB. (2013). Project briefs for SHRP 2 safety research. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Retrieved from < http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/safety-all.pdf >.
49. TRB. (2014). SHRP2 safety facts sheet: New safety data available to tackle tough safety issues, improve highway safety. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Transportation Research Board < http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/goshrp2/Content/Documents/Factsheets/SHRP2-Safety-Fact-Sheet.pdf >.
50. Victor, T. (2005). Keeping eye and mind on the road. PhD Thesis, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden.
51. T. Victor, M. Dozza, J. Bärgman, C.-N. Boda, J. Engström, and C. Flannagan G. Markkula Analysis of naturalistic driving study data: SAFER glances, driver inattention, and crash risk SHRP 2 safety project SO8 2015 Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences Wahsington, D.C. ISBN: 978-0-309-27423-4. SHRP 2 SO8A, from < http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/shrp2/SHRP2-S2-S08A-RW-1.pdf >
52. VTTI. (2014). InSight Data Access Website: SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study < https://insight.shrp2nds.us/ > [Retrieved October 23rd, 2014].
53. K.-F. Wu, and P.P. Jovanis Crashes and crash-surrogate events: Exploratory modeling with naturalistic driving data Accident Analysis and Prevention 45 2012 507 516 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.002
54. R.A. Young, S. Seaman, and L. Hsieh Estimated crash risk from the attentional effects of cognitive load for vehicle-related secondary tasks in the 100-car study 2014 Honda Motor Company Interim Report