Crashes and crash-surrogate events: Exploratory modeling with naturalistic driving data

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 45, Issue , 2012, Pages 507-516

  Wu, Kun Feng ^a   Jovanis, Paul P ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Crash surrogate; Naturalistic driving study data analysis; Traffic safety

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES; CRASH FREQUENCY; CRASH SURROGATE; CRASH TYPE; DATA COLLECTION; EMPIRICAL RESULTS; LOGIT MODELS; MODEL SPECIFICATIONS; SAFETY ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZES; TRAFFIC CONFLICTS; TRAFFIC SAFETY;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; DATA REDUCTION; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

ACCELERATION; BICYCLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONFLICT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INJURY; PROBABILITY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; UNITED STATES; WALKING;

ACCELERATION; ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; BICYCLING; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DATA COLLECTION; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; UNITED STATES; WALKING;

EID: 84856096493     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. A. Agresti Categorical Data Analysis 2nd edition 2002 Wiley
2. T. Amemiya Qualitative response models: a survey Journal of Economic Literature 19 1981 1483 1536
3. F.H. Amundsen, and C. Hyden Proceeding of First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts 1977 Institution of Transport Economics, Oslo/Lund Institute of Technology Oslo, Norway
4. J. Archer Methods for the Assessment and Prediction of Traffic Safety at Urban Intersections and their Application in Micro-simulation Modeling 2004 Royal Institute of Technology
5. Battelle, 2006. Evaluation of the Volvo Intelligent Vehicle Initiative Field Operational Test (No. version 1.3). Washington, DC.
6. A.C. Cameron, and P.K. Trivedi Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications 2005 Cambridge University Press
7. H.C. Chin, and S.T. Quek Measurement of traffic conflicts Safety Science 26 3 1997 169 185
8. P. Cooper Experience with traffic conflicts in canada with emphasis on post encroachment time techniques E. Asmussen, International Study of Traffic Conflict Techniques 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin 75 96
9. Datta, T.K.; 1979. Accident surrogates for use in analyzing highway safety hazards. In: Proceedings of the Second International Traffic Conflict Technique Workshop, pp. 4-20.
10. G.A. Davis, J. Hourdos, and H. Xiong Outline of a causal theory of traffic conflicts and collisions Proceedings of the 87th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD-ROM) National Research Council, TRB, Washington, DC 2008
11. G.A. Davis, and T. Swenson Collective responsibility for freeway rear-ending accidents: an application of probabilistic causal models Accident Analysis and Prevention 38 4 2006 728 736
12. Dingus, T.A.; Klauer, S.G.; Neale, V.L.; Petersen, A.; Lee, S.E.; Sudweeks, J.; Perez, M.A.; Hankey, J.; Ramsey, D.; Gupta, S.; Bucher, C.; Doerzaph, Z.R.; Jermeland, J.; Knipling, R.R.; 2005. The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II - Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment. National Highway Traffic Safety Admin. (Contract No. DTNH22-00-C-07007).
13. FHWA, 2003. Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models. Final Report, Publication No. FHWA-RD-03-050, Federal Highway Administration.
14. FHWA, 2008. Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM).
15. Fitch, G.M.; Rakha, H.A.; Arafeh, M.; Blanco, M.; Gupta, S.A.; Zimmermann, R.P.; Hanowski, R.J.; 2008. Safety Benefit Evaluation of a Forward Collision Warning System. US Department of Transportation, DOT HS 810 910. Washington, DC.
16. T. Gordon, P. Green, L. Kostyniuk, M. Barnes, A. Blankespoor, S. Bogard, and D. Blower A multivariate analysis of crash and naturalistic event data in relation to highway factors using the GIS framework Proceedings of the 4th SHRP2 Safety Research Symposium Washington, DC 2009
17. G.B. Grayson, and A.S. Hakkert Accident analysis and conflict behaviour J. Rotherngatter, R.A. de Bruine, Road-user and Traffic Safety 1987 Van Gorcum 27 59
18. S.M. Gully, D.J. Whitney, and F.E. Vanosdall Prediction of police officers traffic accident involvement using behavioral observations Accident Analysis and Prevention 27 3 1995 355 362
19. W.H. Greene Econometric Analysis 5th edition 2003 Prentice Hall New York
20. F. Guo, K.G. Klauer, J.M. Hankey, and T.A. Dingus Near crashes as crash surrogate for naturalistic driving studies Transportation Research Record 2147 2010 66 74
21. E. Hauer Traffic conflicts and exposure Accident Analysis and Prevention 14 5 1982 359 364
22. E. Hauer, and P. Grder Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts technique Accident Analysis and Prevention 18 6 1986 471 481
23. Hauer, E.; 1999. Safety in Geometric Design Standards. White Paper.
24. C. Hydén The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique 1987 Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund University Lund, Sweden
25. Hydén, C.; 1996. Traffic conflicts technique: state-of-the-art. In: Topp, H.H. (Ed.), Traffic Safety Work with Video-processing. University Kaiserslautern. Transportation Department, Green Series No. 43.
26. Jovanis, P.P.; Agüero, K.; Wu, F.; Shankar, V.; (2011). Naturalistic driving event data analysis: omitted variable bias and multilevel modeling approaches. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, in press.
27. Jovanis, P.P.; Shankar, V.; Aguero-Valverde, J.; Wu, K.; Greenstein, A. (2010), Analysis of Existing Data: Prospective Views on Methodological Paradigms, Draft Final Report, Larson Transportation Institute, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, Prepared for The Strategic Highway Research Program 2, Transportation Research Board of The National Academies.
28. D. McFadden Conditional Logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior P. Zarembka, Frontiers in Econometrics 1974 Academic Press New York 105 142
29. McGehee, D.V.; Boyle, L.N.; Hallmark, S.J.; Lee, D.; Neyens, D.M.; Ward, N.J.; 2010. S02 Integration of Analysis Methods and Development of Analysis Plan Phase II Report.
30. Migletz, D.; Glauz, W.; Bauer, K.; 1985. Relationships between Traffic Conflicts and Accidents, Report FHWA/RD-84/042. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
31. S. Oppe Evaluation of traffic conflict techniques Proceeding of the Workshop on Traffic Conflicts and Other Intermediate Measures in Safety Evaluation Budapest 1986
32. S.R. Perkins, and J.L. Harris Traffic Conflict Characteristics: Accident Potential at Intersections 1967 General Motors Corporation Warren, MI
33. R. Risser Behavior in traffic conflict situations Accident Analysis and Prevention 17 2 1985 179 197
34. N. Saunier, and T. Sayed A probabilistic framework for the automated analysis of the exposure to road collision Transportation Research Record 2019 2008 96 104
35. T. Sayed, and S. Zein Traffic conflict standards for intersections Transportation Planning and Technology 22 1999 309 323
36. V. Shankar, P.P. Jovanis, J. Aguero, and F. Gross Analysis of naturalistic driving data: a prospective view on methodological paradigms Transportation Research Record 2061 2008 1 8
37. Strategic Highway Research Program 2, 2010. Website for Naturalistic Driving Data: http://www.trb.org/StrategicHighwayResearchProgram2SHRP2/Public/ Pages/RFP-S08-Resources-and-Reference-Material-487.aspx.
38. Svensson A Method for Analyzing the Traffic Process in a Safety Perspective. Bulletin 166 1998 Dept. of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund University Lund, Sweden
39. A.P. Tarko, and P. Songchitruksa Estimating frequency of crashes as extreme traffic events Proceedings of the 84th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting (CD-ROM) National Research Council, TRB, Washington, DC 2005
40. Tarko, A.P.; Davis, G, Saunier, N.; Sayed, T.; Washington, S.; 2009. Surrogate Measures of Safety, White Paper.
41. Topp, H.H.; 1998. Traffic Safety Work with Video-Processing. University Kaiserslautern, Transportation Department, Green Series No. 43, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
42. K. Train Descrete Choice Methods with Simulation 2nd edition 2009 Cambridge University Press
43. A. Várhelyi Dynamic Speed Adaptation Based on Information Technology - A Theoretical Background, Bulletin 142 1996 Dept. of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund University Lund, Sweden
44. VanArem, B.; DeVos, A.P.; 1997. The Effect of a Special Lane for Intelligent Vehicles on Traffic Flows. TNO-INRO Report 1997-02a. Delft, The Netherlands.
45. Vogel, K.; 2003. Modeling Driver Behavior-A Control Theory Based Approach. Institute of Technology, University of Linköping, Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertation No. 751. Sweden.
46. Volvo, 2005. Volvo Trucks Field Operational Test: Evaluation of Advanced Safety Systems for Heavy Truck Tractors. Washington, DC.
47. M.J. Williams Validity of the traffic conflicts technique Accident Analysis and Prevention 13 2 1981 133 135
48. K. Wu, and P.P. Jovanis Defining, screening, and validating crash surrogate events using naturalistic driving data Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Road Safety and Simulation 2011