Effects of an 'expert mode' voice command system on task performance, glance behavior & driver physiology

AutomotiveUI 2014 - 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, in Cooperation with ACM SIGCHI - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Reimer, Bryan ^a   Mehler, Bruce ^a   Dobres, Jonathan ^a   McAnulty, Hale ^a   Mehler, Alea ^a   Munger, Daniel ^a   Rumpold, Adrian ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Automotive human machine interface; Distraction; Driver safety; Speech interface; Visual attention; Voice interface; Workload

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ROADS AND STREETS;

DISTRACTION; DRIVER SAFETY; HUMAN MACHINE INTERFACE; SPEECH INTERFACE; VISUAL ATTENTION; VOICE INTERFACES; WORKLOAD;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 85116180832     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2667317.2667320     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Angell, L. and Perez, M.A. 2013. Explanatory Material About the Definition of a Task Used in NHTSA's Driver Distraction Guidelines, And Task Examples (Report No. DOT HS 811 858). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington, DC
2. Barón, A. and Green, P. 2006. Safety and Usability of Speech Interfaces for In-Vehicle Tasks while Driving: A Brief Literature Review. The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI), Ann Arbor, MI
3. Burns, P., Harbluk, J., Foley, J., and Angell, L. (2012). The importance of task duration and related measures in assessing the distraction potential of in-vehicle tasks. Proc. Second International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '10).
4. Chiang, D.P., Brooks, A.M., and Weir, D.H. (2005). Comparison of Visual-Manual and Voice Interaction With Contemporary Navigation System HMIs. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0433, Vol.
5. Driver Focus-Telematics Working Group. 2006. Statement of Principles, Criteria and Verification Procedures on Driver Interactions with Advanced In-Vehicle Information and Communication Systems, Version 2.0. Alliance of Automotive Manufacturers
6. Ei-Wen Lo, V. and Green, P.A. (2013). Development and Evaluation of Automotive Speech Interfaces: Useful Information from the Human Factors and the Related Literature. International Journal of Vehicular Technology, Vol. 2013.
7. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., and Ramsey, D.J. 2006. The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data (Report No. DOT HS 810 594). United States Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC
8. Mehler, B. and Reimer, B. (2013). An initial assessment of the significance of task pacing on self-report and physiological measures of workload while driving. Proc. 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, 170-176.
9. Mehler, B., Reimer, B., and Coughlin, J.F. (2012). Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task: an on-road study across three age groups. Human Factors, Vol. 54, 3, 396-412.
10. Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Dobres, J., McAnulty, H., Mehler, A., Munger, D., and Coughlin, J.F. 2014. Further Evaluation of the Effects of a Production Level "Voice-Command" Interface on Driver Behavior: Replication and a Consideration of the Significance of Training Method (Technical Report 2014-2). MIT AgeLab, Cambridge, MA
11. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2013. Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices (Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0053). U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington, DC
12. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2012. Draft Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices (Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0053), U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Washington, DC
13. Östlund, J., Peters, B., Thorslund, B., Engström, J., Markkula, G., Keinath, A., Horst, D., Juch, S., Mattes, S., and Foehl, U. 2005. Adaptive Integrated Driver-Vehicle Interface (AIDE): Driving performance assessment - methods and metrics. (Report No. IST-1-507674-IP). Information Society Technologies (IST) Programme, Gothenburg, Sweden
14. R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
15. Reimer, B. and Mehler, B. (2011). The impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers: a field study and simulation validation. Ergonomics, Vol. 54, 10, 932-942.
16. Reimer, B., Gruevski, P., and Coughlin, J.F. 2014. MIT AgeLab Video Annotator, Cambridge, MA
17. Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Wang, Y., and Coughlin, J.F. (2012). A field study on the impact of variations in short-term memory demands on drivers' visual attention and driving performance across three age groups. Human Factors, Vol. 54, 3, 454-468.
18. Reimer, B., Mehler, B., Dobres, J., and Coughlin, J.F. 2013. The Effects of a Production Level "Voice-Command" Interface on Driver Behavior: Reported Workload, Physiology, Visual Attention, and Driving Performance (Technical Report 2013-17a). MIT AgeLab, Cambridge, MA
19. Shutko, J., Mayer, K., Laansoo, E., and Tijerina, L. (2009). Driver workload effects of cell phone, music player, and text messaging tasks with the Ford SYNC voice interface versus handheld visual-manual interfaces SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0786, Vol.
20. Smith, D.L., Chang, J., Glassco, R., Foley, J., and Cohen, D. (2005). Methodology for capturing driver eye glance behavior during in-vehicle secondary tasks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1937, 1, 61-65.