Social media and public administration in Spain: A comparative analysis of the regional level of government

E-Government Success around the World: Cases, Empirical Studies, and Practical Recommendations

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 276-298

  Criado, J Ignacio ^a   Rojas Martín, Francisco ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944677802     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4173-0.ch014     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. AGIMO. (2009). Engage. Getting on with Government 2.0. Report of the Government 2.0 Taskforce. Australian Government Information Management Office. Retrieved September 15, 2010, from www. finance.gov.au
2. Bailey, C., & Singleton, R. (2010). National survey of social media use in state government. Lexington: NASCIO.
3. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 30-40. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004.
4. Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123-132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001.
5. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 11. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x.
6. Calista, D. J., & Melitski, J. (2007). e-Government and e-Governance: Converging constructs of public sector information and communications technologies. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 87-120.
7. Cerrillo i Martínez, A. (2010). Web 2.0 y la participación ciudadana en la transparencia administrativa en la sociedad de la información. In Cotino, L. (Ed.), Libertades de expresión e información en Internet y las redes sociales: ejercicio, amenazas y garantías. Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de València.
8. Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0. Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 15, 1-9.
9. Chun, S. A., & Warner, J. (2010). Finding information in an era of abundance: Towards a collaborative tagging environment in government. Information Polity. The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 15, 89-103.
10. Criado, J. I. (2009). Entre Sueños Utópicos y Visiones Pesimistas. Internet y las TIC en la Modernización de las Administraciones Públicas. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública.
11. Criado, J. I., Martín, Y., & Camacho, D. (2011). Experiences using social networks in Spanish public administration. Paper presented at the meeting of the 1st International Workshop on Social Data Mining for Human Behaviour Analysis. Songndal, Norway.
12. Criado, J. I., & Rojas-Martin, F. (2012). Strategies and realities of social media diffusion in the public sector. Evidence from the regional government in Spain. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Group of Public Administration. Bergen, Norway.
13. Danziger, J. N., & Andersen, K. V. (2002). Impacts of information technology on public administration: An analysis of empirical research from the "Golden Age" of transformation. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 591-627. doi:10.1081/PAD-120003292.
14. Dixon, B. E. (2010). Towards e-Government 2.0: An assessment of where e-government 2.0 is and where it is headed. Public Administration & Management, 15(2), 418-454.
15. Generalitat de Cataluña. (2012). Guía de usos y estilo en las redes sociales de la Generalitat de Cataluña. Retrieved May 13, 2012, from http:// www.gencat.cat/web/meugencat/documents
16. Gil-García, J. R. (2012). Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2015-6.
17. Gobierno Vasco. (2011). Guía de Usos y Estilos del Gobierno Vasco. Retrieved May15, 2001, from http://www.irekia.euskadi.net/assets/a_documents/
18. Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2006). Analyzing egovernment research. Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265. doi:10.1016/j. giq.2006.06.005.
19. Heidinger, C., Buchmann, E., & Böhn, K. (2010). Impact assessment in public policy: Towards a Web 2.0 application. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 15(1-2), 33-50.
20. Hood, C., & Margetts, H. (2007). The tools of government in the digital age. London: Palgrave.
21. Hrdinová, J., Helbig, N., & Peters, C. S. (2010). Designing social media policy for government: Eight essential elements. Albany: The Research foundation of State University of New York. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.ctg. albany.edu/publications
22. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
23. Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2010). Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 113-121. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.001.
24. Nam, T. (2012). Dual effects of the internet on political activism: Reinforcing and mobilizing. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 90-97. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.010.
25. ONTSI. (2011). Informe Anual de la Sociedad de la Información en España. Industria y hábitos de consumo. Retrieved April 20, 2012, from http:// www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/estudios-informes/
26. Pollit, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Ramón, F. (2010). La red social como ejemplo de participación: casos y cuestiones. In Cotino, L. (Ed.), Libertades de expresión e información en Internet y las redes sociales: ejercicio, amenazas y garantías. Valencia: Publicacions de la Universitat de València.
28. Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research. Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646-665. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002.
29. Axelsson, K., Ulf, M., & Lindgren, I. (2010). Exploring the importance of citizen participation and involvement in e-government projects. Practice, incentives, and organization. Transforming Government: People, Process and policy, 4, 299-321.
30. Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). The great theory hunt: Does e-government really have a problem? Paper presented at the EGPA Annual Conference. Bergen. Norway.
31. Bernhard, I., & Wihlborg, E. (2012). Regional e- Governance opens up to entrepreneurial behavior in public administration. In Johansson, B., Karlsson, C., & Stough, R. R. (Eds.), Agglomeration, clusters, and entrepreneurship: Studies in regional development. London: Edward Elgar Publications.
32. Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2010). User and community co-production of public services and public policies through collective decision-making: The role of emerging technologies. In Brandsen, T., & Holzer, M. (Eds.), The future of governance. Newark, NJ: National Center for Public Performance.
33. Claes, N. J., Hurley, C., & Stefanone, M. A. (2012). Do me a solid? Information asymmetry, liking, and compliance gaining online. Paper presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii.
34. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2005). New public management is dead - long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Management Research and Theory, 16, 467-494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057.
35. Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2006). e-Gov research quality improvements since 2003: More rigor, but research (perhaps) redefined, electronic government. LNCS, 4084,1-12. Springer, Heidelberg.
36. Heeks, R. (1999). Reinventing government in the Information Age - International practice in ITenabled public sector reform. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203204962.
37. Heeks, R. (2006). Implementing and managing e-government: An international text. Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage Publications.
38. Ilshammar, L., Bjurström, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2005). Public e-services in Sweden: Old wine in new bottles? Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 17(2), 11-40.
39. Irani, Z., Love, P., & Montazemi, A. (2007). Egovernment: Past, present and future. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 103-105. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000678.
40. Jun, K.-N., & Weare, C. (2011). Institutional motivations in the adoption of innovations: The case of e-government. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 21(3), 495-519.doi:10.1093/jopart/muq020.
41. Lee, J. (2012). Active e-participation in local governance: Citizen participation values and social networks. Paper presented at the EGPA Annual Conference. Bergen. Norway.
42. Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2011). Exploring the role of social networks in affective organizational commitment: Network centrality, strength of ties, and structural holes. American Review of Public Administration, 41, 205-223. doi:10.1177/0275074010373803.
43. Löfgren, K., & Meijer, A. (2012). Why do governments not copy successful technological practices? A study of the transfer of a technology for citizen participation from the Netherlands to Denmark. Paper presented at the EGPA Annual Conference. Bergen. Norway.
44. Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2011). Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 329-345. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.007.
45. Margetts, H. (2009). Public management change and e-government: The emergence of digital era governance. In Chadwick, A. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 99-113).
46. Pignato, V. (2012). How to read development lines of e-government in the Public Administrations? Towards the construction of an interpretative model. Paper presented at the EGPA Annual Conference. Bergen. Norway.
47. Seebach, C. (2012) Searching for answers -knowledge exchange through social media in organizations. Paper presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii.
48. Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2012). Political communication and influence through microblogging-- An empirical analysis of sentiment in Twitter messages and Retweet behavior. Paper presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii.
49. Suh, A., & Shin, K.-S. (2012). Self discrepancy, perceived privacy rights, and contribution in virtualcommunities. Paper presented at the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii.
50. Togo, T., & Enomoto, K. (2011). Consideration of regional informatization practices in Japan: A case study on a civic organization operating community media. Journal of Business Studies, 58(2), 237-255.
51. Walsham, G. (2012). Are we making a better world with ICTs? Reflections on a future agenda for the IS field. Journal of Information Technology, 27(2), 87-93. doi:10.1057/jit.2012.4.
52. Yang, T. M., & Maxwell, T. A. (2011). Information- sharing in public organizations: A literature review of interpersonal, intra-organizational and inter-organizational success factors. Government Information Quarterly, 28, 164-175. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.008.