Impact assessment in public policy: Towards a Web 2.0 application

Information Polity

Volumn 15, Issue 1-2, 2010, Pages 33-50

  Heidinger, Clemens ^a   Buchmann, Erik ^a   Böhm, Klemens ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Impact assessment; Web 2.0 Application

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886997577     PISSN: 15701255     EISSN: 18758754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/IP-2010-0198     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. A. Alba et al., Applications of Voting Theory to Information Mashups. In ICSC '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing, 2008, pp. 10-17.
2. Band der amtlichen Entscheidungssammlung (BVerfGE 39). pp. 210, 226.
3. Band der amtlichen Entscheidungssammlung (BVerfGE 50). pp. 290+, 299, 333+.
4. J.M. Carroll and P.A. Swatman, Structured-case: a methodological framework for building theory in information systems research, European Journal of Information Systems 9(4) (2000), 235-242. (Pubitemid 33207143)
5. A.-M. Chang and P.K. Kannan, Leveraging web 2.0 in government. www.businessofgovernment.org, 2008.
6. European Commission. Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue-General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=COM:2002:0704:FIN:en:PDF, December 2002.
7. European Commission. Impact Assessment of the Thematic Strategy on Soil Protection. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/pdf/sec 2006 620 en.pdf, September 2006.
8. European Commission. Protection of Soil and Amending Directive 2004/35/EC. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/pdf/com 2006 0232 en.pdf, September 2006.
9. European Commission. Second strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/govern ance/better regulation/documents/com 2008 0032 en.pdf, January 2008.
10. European Commission. Impact Assessment Board Report for 2008. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ. do?uri=SEC:2009:0055:FIN:EN:PDF, January 2009.
11. European Commission. Impact Assessment Guidelinies, SEC(2009) 92. http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/commis sion guidelines/docs/iag 2009 en.pdf, January 2009.
12. European Commission. Third strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/govern ance/better regulation/documents/com 2009 0015 en.pdf, January 2009.
13. Evaluation of the European Commission's Impact Assessment System. http://ec.europa.eu/governance/impact/key docs/docs/tep eias final report.pdf, April 2007.
14. A.C.B. Garcia, C. Maciel and F.B. Pinto, A quality inspection method to evaluate e-government sites. In EGOV, 2005, pp. 198-209. (Pubitemid 41450330)
15. L.M. Garshol and G. Moore, ISO 13250-2: Information Technology-Document Description and Processing Languages-Topic Maps-Data Model. Final draft, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, December 2005.
16. Gesetz zur F̈orderung Erneuerbarer Energien im Ẅarmebereich (Erneuerbare-Energien-Ẅarmegesetz-EEẄarmeG). http://www.erneuerbare- energien.de/files/pdfs/allgemein/application/pdf/ee waermeg.pdf, August 2008.
17. C. Heidinger, E. Buchmann and K. B̈ohm, Towards collaborative web-based impact assessment. In dg.o '09: Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, pp. 190-198. Digital Government Society of North America, 2009.
18. C. Maciel and A.C.B. Garcia, Design and metrics of a 'democratic citizenship community' in support of deliberative decision-making. In EGOV, 2007, pp. 388-400.
19. C. Maciel and A.C.B. Garcia, Modeling of a democratic citizenship community to facilitate the consultative and deliberative process in the web. In ICEIS, 2007, pp. 387-394.
20. S. MacLean and M.M. Burgess, In the public interest: Assessing expert and stakeholder influence in public deliberation about biobanks, Public Understanding of Science (May 2009).
21. T. O'Reilly, O'Reilly Network: What Is Web 2.0. http://www.oreillynet. com/lpt/a/6228, September 2005.
22. S. Pepper, The TAO of topic maps, In Proceedings of XML Europe 2000, Paris, France, 2000.
23. T. Saaty and J. Shang, Group decision-making: Head-count versus intensity of preference, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 41(1) (March 2007), 22-37. (Pubitemid 44873922)
24. A. Strauss and J. Corbin, Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, Calif., 1990.
25. S. Wright and J. Street, Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums. New Media Society 9(5) (October 2007), 849-869.