Between the notion and the act: Veteran teachers’ tpack and practice in 1:1 settings

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Exploring, Developing, and Assessing TPCK

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 165-189

  Hervey, Lisa G ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

1:1 settings; Multiple case study; Qualitative; TPACK; Veteran teachers

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944111966     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8080-9_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Anderson, R. E., & Ronnkvist, A. (1999). The presence of computers in American schools. Teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 national survey (Report No. 2). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (4), 292–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x.
3. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52 (1), 154–168.
4. Applefi eld, J. M., Huber, R., & Moallem, M. (2001). Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding. High School Journal, 84 (2), 35–54.
5. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9 (2). Retrieved from http://www. jtla.org
6. Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. L. (1999). The infl uence of computer and Internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31 (4), 356–384.
7. Corbell, K. (2009). Strategies that can reduce new teacher attrition in North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: Friday Institute White Paper Series. Retrieved from http://www.fi.ncsu.edu/podcast/whitepaper-series/2009/08/17/strategies-that-can-reduce-new-teacher-attrition-in-north-carolina/
8. Cox, S. (2008). A conceptual analysis of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Doctoral Dissertation, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT.
9. Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., & Heinecke, W. F. (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratios bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23 (5), 440–452. doi: 10.1111/j.13652729.2007.00227.x.
10. Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1990). The evolution of teachers’ instructional beliefs and practices in high-access-to-technology classrooms (Apple classrooms of tomorrow Report #8). Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc.
11. Ethel, R. G., & McMeniman, M. M. (2000). Unlocking the knowledge in action of an expert practitioner. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (2), 87–101. doi: 10.1177/002248710005100203.
12. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
13. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57 (3), 1953–1960.
14. Groth, R., Spickler, D., Bergner, J., & Bardzell, M. (2009). A qualitative approach to assessing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9 (4), 392–412.
15. Harris, J. (2008). TPCK in in-service education: Assisting experienced teachers’ “planned improvisations”. In J. Colbert, K. Boyd, K. Clarke, S. Guan, J. Harris, M. Kelly, & A. Thompson (Eds.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 251–272). New York: Routledge.
16. Hervey, L. (2011). Between the notion and the act: Veteran teachers’ TPACK in 1:1 settings. Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. Available at: http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/handle/1840.16/6799
17. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technologyintegrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13 (2), 277–302.
18. Hughes, J., & Scharber, C. (2008). Leveraging the development of English TPCK. In J. Colbert, K. Boyd, K. Clarke, S. Guan, J. Harris, M. Kelly, & A. Thompson (Eds.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 87–106). New York: Routledge.
19. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2004). An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasizing refl ective practice. Higher Education, 47, 283–310.
20. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing Technological Pedagogical Knowledge. In AACTE (Eds.). The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for a and educators (pp. 3-30). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group for the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education.
21. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Bouck, E. C., DeSchryver, M., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Wolf, L. G. (2011). Deep-play: Developing TPACK for 21st century teachers. International Journal of Learning Technology, 6 (2), 146–163. doi: 10.1504/IJLT.2011.042646. Retrieved from http://punya.educ.msu.edu/publications/koehler.et.al.ijlt2011.pdf
22. Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 807– 828. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00774.x.
23. Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29 (6), 861–878. doi: 10.1080/0141192032000137349.
24. Meade, P. & McMeniman, M. (1992). Stimulated recall: An effective methodology for examining successful teaching in science. Australian Educational Researcher, 19(3), 1–18.
25. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017–1054.
26. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009, May). Too Cool for School? No Way! Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(7). 14–18. Retrieved from http://punya.educ.msu.edu/2009/04/30/too-cool-for-school-using-the-tpack-framework/
27. National School Board Association. (2010). NSBA technology poll shows need to better assess 21st century skills. School Board News Today. Retrieved from http://schoolboardnews.nsba.org/2010/10/nsba-technology-poll-shows-need-to-better-assess-21st-century-skills/
28. Niess, M. L. (2008). Guiding preservice teachers developing TPCK. In J. Colbert, K. Boyd, K. Clarke, S. Guan, J. Harris, M. Kelly, & A. Thompson (Eds.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 223–250). New York: Routledge.
29. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps in understanding the net generation. Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/Resources/EducatingtheNetGeneration/IsItAgeorITFirstSepsTowardUnd/6058
30. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research methods and evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Pegler, K., Kollewyn, J., & Crichton, S. (2010). Generational attitudes and teacher ICT use. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18 (3), 443–458.
32. Pink, D. H. (2006). A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. New York: Riverhead Books.
33. Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2 (4), 405–435.
34. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9 (5), 1–6. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/default.asp
35. Puma, M. J., Chaplin, D. D., & Pape, A. D. (2000). E-rate and the digital divide: A preliminary analysis from the integrated studies of educational technology. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
36. Rosenstein, B. (2000). Video use for program evaluation: A conceptual perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26 (4), 373–394. doi: 10.1016/S0191-491X(00)00024-9.
37. Rosenstein, B. (2002). Video use in social science research and program evaluation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(3), 22–43.
38. Schmidt, D. A. et al. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
39. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4–14.
40. Silvernail, D., & Lane, D. (2004). The impact of Maine’s one-to-one laptop program on Middle school teachers and students: Phase one summary evidence. Gorham, ME: Maine Education Policy Research Institute. Retrieved from http://usm.maine.edu/cepare/mlti.htm
41. Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., & Angeles, J. (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology (Statistical analysis report NCES 2000-102). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
42. Spires, H., Hervey, L., & Watson, T. (2013). Scaffolding the TPACK framework with literacy teachers: New literacies, new minds. In S. Kajder & C. A. Young (Eds.), Research on English language arts and technology. Greenwich, CN: Information Age Press.
43. Spires, H., Wiebe, E., Young, C. A., Hollebrands, K., & Lee, J. (2009). Toward a new learning ecology: Teaching and learning in 1:1 environments. Raleigh, NC: Friday Institute White Paper Series.
44. Storberg-Walker, J. (2008). Wenger’s communities of practice revisited: A (failed) exercise in applied communities of practice theory-building research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10 (4), 555–577.
45. Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self effi cacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36 (3), 231–250.
46. Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13 (3), 235–286.
47. Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The interplay of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39 (1), 165–205.
48. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.