From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1133-1148

  Al Zahrani, Abdulrahman M ^a  

^a KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING; SURVEYS;

CREATIVE THINKING; E-LEARNING TOOL; HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS; MULTIPLE METHODS; RESEARCH DESIGNS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SOCIAL LEARNING; STUDENTS' VIEWS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84943740353     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12353     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams, J. L., (1974). Conceptual blockbusting: a guide to better ideas. San Francisco: Freeman Press.
2. Adams, J. L., (1986). The care and feeding of ideas: a guide to encouraging creativity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3. Abeysekera, L., and, Dawson, P., (2014). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.
4. Amabile, T. M., (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Barron, F., (1968). Creativity and personal freedom. New York: Van Nostrand.
6. Barron, F., (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7. Bergmann, J., and, Sams, A., (2012). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
8. Bishop, J. L., and, Verleger, M. A., (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. Paper presented at the 120th ASEE Conference and Exposition.
9. Bonnardel, N., and, Zenasni, F., (2010). The impact of technology on creativity in design: an enhancement? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19, 2, 180-191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00560.x.
10. Braun, V., and, Clarke, V., (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2, 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
11. Butt, A., (2014). Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: evidence from Australia. Business Education and Accreditation, 6, 1, 33-43.
12. Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., and, Ball, N., (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Education Tech Research Dev, 61, 563-580. doi: 10.1007/s11423-013-9305-6.
13. De Bono, E., (1971). Lateral thinking for management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. De Bono, E., (1985). Six thinking hats. Boston: Little, Brown.
15. De Bono, E., (1992). Serious creativity: using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. New York: Harper Collins.
16. DeGrazia, J. L., Falconer, J. L., Nicodemus, G., and, Medlin, W., (2012). Incorporating screencasts into chemical engineering courses. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, USA.
17. Doughty, S., Francksen, K., Huxley, M., and, Leach, M., (2008). Technological enhancements in the teaching and learning of reflective and creative practice in dance. Research in Dance Education, 9, 2, 129-146. doi: 10.1080/14647890802088041.
18. Edwards, S. M., (2001). The technology paradox: efficiency versus creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 2, 221-228. doi: 10.1207/s15326934crj1302-9.
19. Eysenck, H. J., (1993). Creativity and personality: A theoretical perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147-178.
20. Findlay-Thompson, S., and, Mombourquette, P., (2014). Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Business Education and Accreditation, 6, 1, 63-71.
21. Freud, S., (1908/1959). The relation of the poet to day-dreaming. In, S. Freud, (Ed.), Collected papers (Vol. 4, pp. 173-183). London: Hogarth Press.
22. Gardner, H., (1983). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
23. Gordon, W. J. J., (1961). Synectics: the development of creative capacity. New York: Harper and Row.
24. Gough, H. G., (1979). A creativity scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398-1405.
25. Gruber, H. E., (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In, D. B. Wallace, and, H. E. Gruber, (Eds), Creative people at work: twelve cognitive case studies (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Guilford, J. P., (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
27. Guilford, J. P., (1973). Characteristics of creativity. Springfield, IL: Illinois State Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Gifted Children Section.
28. Hargrove, R. A., and, Nietfeld, J. L., (2014). The Impact of metacognitive instruction on creative problem solving. The Journal of Experimental Education, 1-28, doi: 10.1080/00220973.2013.876604.
29. Jackson, L. A., Witt, E. A., Games, A. I., Fitzgerald, H. E., von Eye, A., and, Zhao, Y., (2012). Information technology use and creativity: findings from the children and technology project. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2, 370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.006.
30. Kris, E., (1952). Psychoanalytic exploration in art. New York: International Universities Press.
31. Kubie, L. S., (1958). The neurotic distortion of the creative process. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
32. Kumpulainen, K., Mikkola, A., and, Jaatinen, A.-M., (2013). The chronotopes of technology-mediated creative learning practices in an elementary school community. Learning, Media and Technology, 39, 1, 53-74. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2012.752383.
33. Kuo, F.-R., Chen, N.-S., and, Hwang, G.-J., (2014). A creative thinking approach to enhancing the web-based problem solving performance of university students. Computers and Education, 72, 0, 220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.005.
34. Lubart, T. I., (2000-2001). Models of the creative process: past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 3-4, 295-308.
35. MacKinnon, D. W., (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273-281.
36. Martin, L., and, Schwartz, D. L., (2014). A pragmatic perspective on visual representation and creative thinking. Visual Studies, 29, 1, 80-93. doi: 10.1080/1472586x.2014.862997.
37. Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., and, Cook, K. E., (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56, 4, 430-435. doi: 10.1109/TE.2013.2249066.
38. McLaughlin, J. E., Griffin, L. M., Esserman, D. A., Davidson, C. A., Glatt, D. M., Roth, M. T., etal (2013). Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77, 9, 1-8.
39. Mertens, D. M., (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif., London: Sage Publications.
40. Pallant, J. F., (2007). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (3rd ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
41. Simonton, D. K., (1995). Foresight in insight: a Darwinian answer. In, R. J. Sternberg, and, J. E. Davidson, (Eds), The nature of insight (pp. 495-534). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Simonton, D. K., (1998). Donald Campbell's model of the creative process: creativity as blind variation and selective retention. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 153-158.
43. Simonton, D. K., (1999). Talent and its development: an emergenic and epigenetic mode. Psychological Review, 106, 435-457.
44. Sternberg, R. J., (1985a). Beyond IQ: a triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Sternberg, R. J., (1985b). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 3, 607-627.
46. Sternberg, R. J., Lubart, T. I., Kaufman, J. C., and, Pretz, J. E., (2005). Creativity. In, K. J. Holyoak, and, R. G. Morrison, (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 351-369). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Stone, B. B., (2012). Flip Your Classroom to Increase Active Learning and Student Engagement. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Madison, Wisconsin.
48. Strayer, J. F., (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environment Research, 15, 171-193. doi: 10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4.
49. Torrance, E. R., (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.
50. Tune, J. D., Sturek, M., and, Basile, D. P., (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advances in Physiology Education, 37, 316-320. doi: 10.1152/advan.00091.2013.
51. Von Oech, R., (1983). A whack on the side of the head. New York: Warner.
52. Wagner, D., Laforge, P., and, Cripps, D., (2013), June 17-20, 2013. Lecture Material Retention: a First Trial Report on Flipped Classroom Strategies in Electronic Systems Engineering at the University of Regina. Paper presented at the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA13) Conference, Canada.
53. Wallach, M., and, Kogan, N., (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
54. Weisberg, R. W., (1986). Creativity, genius and other myths. New York: Freeman Press.
55. Weisberg, R. W., (1988). Problem solving and creativity. In, R. J. Sternberg, (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 148-176). New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Weisberg, R. W., (1993). Creativity: beyond the myth of genius. New York: Freeman Press.
57. Weisberg, R. W., (1999). Creativity and knowledge: a challenge to theories. In, R. J. Sternberg, (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226-250). New York: Cambridge University Press.