The impact of technology on creativity in design: An enhancement?

Creativity and Innovation Management

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 180-191

  Bonnardel, Nathalie ^a   Zenasni, Franck ^b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955134112     PISSN: 09631690     EISSN: 14678691     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00560.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Adelson, B., (1984) When Novices Surpass Experts. The Difficulty of a Task May Increase with Expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 483-95.
2. Ansburg, P., and Hill, K., (2003) Creative and Analytic Thinkers Differ in their Use of Attentional Resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1141-52.
3. Araujo, C.S., (1996) The Use of Product Development Methods: A Survey of UK Industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 7, 265-77.
4. Bar-Eli, S., (2005) Individual Designing Behavior and Learning Style: Investigation of the Design Process of Interior Design Students. In Gero, J.S. and Bonnardel, N. (eds.), Studying Designers’2005. University of Sydney, Sydney, 249-66.
5. Blanchette, I., and Dunbar, K., (2000) How Analogies are Generated: The Roles of Structural and Superficial Similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 108-24.
6. Bonnardel, N., (2000) Towards Understanding and Supporting Creativity in Design: Analogies in a Constrained Cognitive Environment. Knowledge-Based Systems, 13, 505-13.
7. Bonnardel, N., and Cugini, U., (2007) Test Case Evaluation Report. Deliverable 14. Research contract FP6-IST-2002-001996.
8. Bonnardel, N., and Marmèche, E., (2004) Evocation Processes by Novice and Expert Designers: Towards Stimulating Analogical Thinking. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 176-86.
9. Bonnardel, N., and Sumner, T., (1996) Supporting Evaluation in Design. Acta Psychologica, 91, 221-44.
10. Bonnardel, N., Debroise, X., and Poitou, J.-P., (2005) Users’ skill capture and analysis - Deliverable 4. TʼnD/2/PsyCLE/R/05001-1.0. Research contract FP6-IST-2002-001996.
11. Bouchard, C., Omhover, J.F., Mougenot, C., Aoussat, A., and Westerman, S., (2008) TRENDS: A Content-Based Information Retrieval System For Designers, Third International Conference on Design Computing and Cognition (DCC’08), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
12. Chevalier, A., and Bonnardel, N., (2007) Articulation of Web Site Design Constraints: The Effect of the Designer Expertise and Situation Task. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 2455-72.
13. Chi, M.T.H., Feltovich, P.H., and Glaser, R., (1981) Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-52.
14. Christensen, B.T., (2010) Images of Users and Products shown during Design Processes Increase Users’ Willingness-to-Use the Design Outcome. AIEDAM, 24, in press.
15. Chrysikou, E.G., and Weisberg, R.W., (2005) Following the Wrong Footsteps: Fixation Effects of Pictorial Examples in a Design Problem-Solving Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1134-48.
16. Cugini, U., and Bordegoni, M., (2007) Touch and Design: Novel Haptic Interfaces for the Generation of High Quality Surfaces for Industrial Design. The Visual Computer, 23, 233-46.
17. Dorst, K., and Cross, N., (2001) Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of Problem-Solution. Design Studies, 22, 425-37.
18. Eastman, C.M., (1969) Cognitive Processes and Ill-Defined Problems: A Case Study from Design. In Proceedings of the First Joint International Conference on I.A. Washington, DC, 669-90.
19. Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M., (1998) Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22, 133-87.
20. Fischer, G., and Giaccardi, E., (2007) Sustaining Social Creativity, CACM, 50, 28-9.
21. Fischer, G., Lemke, A.C., Mastaglio, T., and Morch, A.I., (1991) Critics: An Emerging Approach to Knowledge-Based Human Computer Interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 695-721.
22. Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., and Ye, Y., (2005) Beyond Binary Choices: Integrating Individual and Social Creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63, 482-512.
23. Guindon, R., (1990) Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 305-44.
24. Hayes-Roth, B., and Hayes-Roth, F., (1979) A Cognitive Model of Planning. Cognitive Science, 3, 275-310.
25. Jansson, D.G., and Smith, S.M., (1991) Design Fixation. Design Studies, 12, 3-11.
26. Kryssanov, V.V., Tamaki, H., and Kitamura, S., (2001) Understanding Design Fundamentals: How Synthesis and Analysis Drive Creativity, Resulting in Emergence. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 15, 329-42.
27. Lubart, T.I., (2005) How Can Computers be Partners in the Creative Process? International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63, 365-9.
28. Lubart, T.I., and Sternberg, R., (1995) An Investment Approach to Creativity: Theory and Data. In Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B. and Finke, R.A. (eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 271-302.
29. Maher, M.L., Kim, Y.S., and Bonnardel, N., (2010) Editorial on ‘Creativity: Simulation, Stimulation, and Studies’. AIEDAM, 24, in press.
30. McCullough, M., (1996) MIT Press. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Mouchiroud, C., and Lubart, T., (2003) Différences intra-individuelles dans le processus de generation d’idées originales chez l’enfant. In Vom Hofe, A., Charvin, H., Bernaud, J. and Guédon, D. (eds.), Psychologie différentielle: recherches et réflexions. Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, 269-74.
32. Norman, D.A., (1993) Basic Books. Basic Books, New York.
33. Pereira, F.C., and Cardoso, A., (2002) Conceptual Blending and the Quest for the Holy Creative Process. 2nd Workshop on Creative Approaches to Creativity in AI and Cognitive Science - ECAI 2002, Lyon.
34. Puccio, G., and Grivas, C., (2009) Examining the Relationship between Personality Traits and Creativity Styles. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18, 247-55.
35. Purcell, A.T., and Gero, J.S., (1992) The Effects of Examples on the Results of a Design Activity. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5, 82-91.
36. Rittel, H., and Webber, M.M., (1984) Planning Problems are Wicked Problems. In Cross, N. (ed.), Developments in Design Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 135-44.
37. Salomon, G. (ed.) (1993) Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
38. Scapin, D.L., and Bastien, J.M.C., (1997) Ergonomic Criteria for Evaluating the Ergonomic Quality of Interactive Systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16, 220-31.
39. Schneider, S., and Lindemann, U., (2005) Usage of Methods in Student Works. In Gero, J.S. and Bonnardel, N. (eds.). Studying Designers '05. University of Sydney, Sydney, 267-75.
40. Schön, D.A., (1983) Basic Books. Basic Books, New York.
41. Scrivener, S., (1982) An Interactive Raster Graphics System and Language for Artists and Designers. Leicester Polytechnic.
42. Simon, H.A., (1973) The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201.
43. Simon, H.A., (1995) Problem Forming, Problem Finding and Problem Solving in Design. In Collen, A. and Gasparski, W. (eds), Design and Systems. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, 245-57.
44. Smith, S.M., Ward, T.B., and Schumacher, J.S., (1993) Constraining Effects of Examples in a Creative Generation Task. Memory & Cognition, 21, 837-45.
45. Srinivasan, V., and Chakrabarti, A., (2010) Investigating Novelty-Outcome Relationship in Engineering Design. AIEDAM, 24, in press.
46. Stones, C., Cassidy, T., (2007) Comparing Synthesis Strategies of Novice Graphic Designers using Digital and Traditional Design Tools. Design Studies, 28, 59-72.
47. Visser, W., (1990) More or Less Following a Plan during Design: Opportunistic Deviations in Specification. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 33, 247-78.
48. Visser, W., (1994) Organisation of Design Activities: Opportunistic with Hierarchical Episodes. Interacting with Computers, 6, 235-8.
49. Ward, T.B., and Sifonis, C., (1997) Task Demands and Generative Thinking: What Changes and What Remains the Same? Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 245-59.
50. Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M., and Vaid, J., (1997) Conceptual Structures and Processes in Creative Thought. In Ward, T.B., Smith, S.M. and Vaid, J. (eds.), Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 1-27.
51. Ward, T.B., Patterson, M.J., Sifonis, C.M., Dodds, R.A., and Saunders, K.N., (2002) The Role of Graded Category Structure in Imaginative Thought. Memory & Cognition, 30, 199-216.
52. Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C., and Polson, P., (1994) The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioner’s Guide. In Nielsen, J. and Mack, R.L. (eds.), Usability Inspection Methods. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 105-40.
53. Whitefield, A., (1986) An Analysis and Comparison of Knowledge Use in Designing with and without CAD. In Smith, A. (ed.), Proceedings of CAD. Butterworth, London.
54. Wiley, J., (1998) Expertise as Mental Set: The Effects of Domain Knowledge in Creative Problem Solving. Memory & Cognition, 26, 716-30.
55. Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., and Lubart, T., (2008) Tolerance for Ambiguity and Creativity: An Empirical Study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 61-72.