Characterising knee motion and laxity in a testing machine for application to total knee evaluation

Journal of Biomechanics

Volumn 48, Issue 13, 2015, Pages 3551-3558

  Walker, Peter S ^a   Arno, Sally ^a   Borukhoy, Ilya ^a   Bell, Christopher P ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Knee function; Knee laxity; Knee motion; Total knee design; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; BONE; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS; TESTING;

ANTERIOR POSTERIORS; ANTERIOR SURFACE; COMPRESSIVE LOADS; KNEE LAXITIES; KNEE MOTION; OPTICAL TRACKING; TESTING METHODOLOGY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

KNEE PROSTHESES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; JOINT LAXITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; KNEE FUNCTION; LOADING TEST; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VERY ELDERLY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE; KNEE REPLACEMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84943580273     PISSN: 00219290     EISSN: 18732380     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.06.013     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Amiri S., Cooke T.D.V., Wyss U.P. Conceptional design for condylar guiding features of a total knee replacement. J. Med. Devices 2011, 025001-1-025001-9.
2. Arno S., Hadley S., Campbell K.A., Bell C.P., Hall M., Beltran L.S., Recht M.P., Sherman O.H., Walker P.S. The effect of arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy on tibiofemoral stability. Am. J. Sports Med. 2013, 41:73-79.
3. ASTM Standard F1223, 2008, Standard Test Mehod for Determination of Total Knee Replacement Constraint, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2008.
4. Atarod M., Rosvold J.M., Frank C.B., Shrive N.G. A novel testing platform for assessing knee joint mechanics: a parallel robotic system combined with an instrumented spatial linkage. Annals Biomed. Eng. 2014, 42(5):1121-1132.
5. Baldwin M.A., Clary C.W., Fitzpatrick C.K., Deacy J.S., Maletsky L.P., Rullkoetter P.J. Dynamic finite element knee simulation for evaluation of knee replacement mechanics. J. Biomech. 2012, 45(3):474-483.
6. Bergmann G., Bender A., Graichen F., Dymke J., Rohlmann A., Trepczynski A., Heller M.O., Kutzner I. Standardized loads acting in knee implants. PLoS ONE 2014, 9(1):e86035.
7. Blaha J.D., Mancinelli C.A., Simons W.H., Kish V.L., Thyagarajan G. Kinematics of the human knee using an open chain cadaver model. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 2003, 25-34.
8. Blankevoort L., Huiskes R., de Lange A. The envelope of passive knee joint motion. J. Biomech. 1988, 21(9):705-720. (711-720).
9. D'Lima D.D., Patil S., Steklov N., Chien S., Colwell C.W. In vivo knee moments and shear after total knee arthroplasty. J. Biomech. 2007, 40(Suppl 1):S11-S17.
10. DesJardins J.D., Banks S.A., Benson L.C., Pace T., LaBerge M. A direct comparison of patient and force-controlled simulator total knee replacement kinematics. J. Biomech. 2007, 40:3458-3466.
11. DesJardins J.D., Walker P.S., Haider H., Perry J. The use of a force-controlled dynamic knee simulator to quantify the mechanical performance of total knee replacement designs during functional activity. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:1231-1242.
12. Fitzpatrick C.K., Clary C.W., Rullkoetter P.J. The role of patient, surgical, and implant design variation in total knee replacement performance. J. Biomech. 2012, 45:2092-2102.
13. Fitzpatrick C.K., Clary C.W., Laz P.J., Rullkoetter P.J. Relative contributions of design, alignment, and loading variability in knee replacement mechanics. J. Orthop. Res. 2012, 30:2015-2024.
14. Freeman M.A., Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:197-208.
15. Galloway F., Worsley P., Stokes M., Nair P., Taylor M. Development of a statistical model of knee kinetics for applications in pre-clinical testing. J. Biomech. 2012, 45(1):191-195.
16. Griffin T., Rowden N., Moran D., Atkinson R., Woodruff P., Maddern G. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: systematic study. ANZ J. Surg. 2007, 77:214-221.
17. Haider H., Walker P.S. Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:341-348.
18. Haider H., Walker P.S., DesJardins J., Blunn G. Effects of patient and surgical alignment variables on kinematics in TKR simulation under force-control. ASTM Int. 2006, 3(10):3-16.
19. Halder A., Kutzner I., Graichen F., Heinlein B., Beier A., Bergmann G. Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement-in vivo measurements in five patients. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2012, 94:1023-1029.
20. Halewood, C.I., Zakaria, T., Amis, A.A., 2010. Measuring constraint of total knee replacement. 55th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. Mar, New Orleans, LA.
21. Halloran J.P., Clary C.W., Maletsky L.P., Taylor M., Petrella A.J., Rullkoetter P.J. Verification of predicted knee replacement kinematics during simulated gait in the kansas knee simulator. J. Biomech. Eng. 2010, 132:8.
22. Heim C.S., Postak P.D., Plaxton N.A., Greenwald A.S. Classification of mobile-bearing knee designs: mobility and constraint. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2001, 83-A(Suppl. 2):32-37.
23. Heinlein B., Kutzner I., Graichen F., Bender A., Rohlmann A., Halder A.M., Beier A., Bergmann G. ESB clinical biomechanics award 2008: complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months. Clin. Biomech. 2009, 24(4):315-326.
24. Hill P.F., Vedi V., Williams A., Iwaki H., Pinskerova V., Freeman M.A. Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2000, 82:1196-1198.
25. Hoshino Y., Tashman S. Internal tibial rotation during in vivo, dynamic activity induces greater sliding of tibio-femoral joint contact on the medial compartment. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2012, 20(7):1268-1275.
26. Hosseini A., Van de Velde S.K., Kozanek M., Gill T.J., Grodzinsky A.J., Rubash H.E., Li G. In-vivo time-dependent articular cartilage contact behavior of the tibiofemoral joint. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010, 18(7):909-916.
27. Hsieh H.H., Walker P.S. Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1976, 58:87-93.
28. Johal P., Williams A., Wragg P., Hunt D., Gedroyc W. Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI. J. Biomech. 2005, 38:269-276.
29. Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 2003, 410:69-81.
30. Kozanek M., Hosseini A., Liu F., Van de Velde S.K., Gill T.J., Rubash H.E., Li G. Tibiofemoral kinematics and condylar motion during the stance phase of gait. J. Biomech. 2009, 42:1877-1884.
31. Kurosawa H., Walker P.S., Abe S., Garg A., Hunter T. Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J. Biomech. 1985, 18:487-499.
32. Li G., DeFrate L.E., Park S.E., Gill T.J., Rubash H.E. In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee: an investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models. Am. J. Sports Med. 2005, 33:102.
33. Liu Y.L., Chen W.C., Yeh W.L., McClean C.J., Huang C.H., Lin K.J., Cheng C.K. Mimicking anatomical condylar configuration into knee prosthesis could improve knee kinematics after TKA - a computational simulation. Clin. Biomech. 2012, 27(2):176-181.
34. Luger E., Sathasivam S., Walker P.S. Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements. Knee 1997, 4:7-14.
35. Markolf K.L., Bargar W.L., Shoemaker S.C., Amstutz H.C. The role of joint load in knee stability. J. Bont Jt. Surg. Am. 1981, 63:570-585.
36. Moran M.F., Bhimji S., Racanelli J., Piazza S.J. Computational assessment of constraint in total knee replacement. J. Biomech. 2008, 41(9):2013-2020.
37. Most E., Axe J., Rubash H., Li G. Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:1743-1748.
38. Mu S., Moro-Oka T., Johal P., Hamai S., Freeman M.A., Banks S.A. Comparison of static and dynamic knee kinematics during squatting. Clin. Biomech. 2011, 26:106-108.
39. Myles C.M., Rowe P.J., Walker C.R.C., Nutton R.W. Knee joint functional range of movement prior to and following total knee arthroplasty measured using flexible electrogoniometry. Gait Posture 2002, 16:46-54.
40. Nakagawa S., Kadoya Y., Todo S., Kobayashi A., Sakamoto H., Freeman M.A., Yamano Y. Tibiofemoral movement 3: full flexion in the living knee studied by MRI. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2000, 82:1199-1200.
41. Patil S., Colwell C.W., Ezzet K.A., D'Lima D.D. Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement?. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2005, 87:332-338.
42. Pinskerova V., Johal P., Nakagawa S., Sosna A., Williams A., Gedroyc W., Freeman M.A. Does the femur roll-back with flexion?. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 2004, 86:925-931.
43. Rovick J.S., Reuben J.D., Schrager R.J., Walker P.S. Relation between knee motion and ligament length patterns. Clin. Biomech. 1991, 6:213-220.
44. Scarvell J.M., Smith P.N., Refshauge K.M., Galloway H.R., Woods K.R. Evaluation of a method to map tibiofemoral contact points in the normal knee using MRI. J. Orthop. Res. 2004, 788:793.
45. Tashman S., Araki D. Effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on in vivo, dynamic knee function. Clin. Sports Med. 2013, 32(1):47-59.
46. Varadarajan K.M., Harry R.E., Johnson T., Li G. Can in vitro systems capture the characteristic differences between the flexion-extension kinematics of the healthy and TKA knee?. Med. Eng. Phys. 2009, 31:899-906.
47. Victor J., Labey L., Wong P., Innocenti B., Bellemans J. The influence of muscle load on tibiofemoral knee kinematics. J. Orthop. Res. 2010, 28(Apr):419-428.
48. Walker P.S., Glauber S.M., Wang H. Laboratory Evaluation Method for the Functional Performance of Total Knee Replacements 2012, 9:1-10. ASTM International, United States.
49. Walker P.S., Heller Y., Cleary D.J., Yildirim G. Preclinical evaluation method for total knees designed to restore normal knee mechanics. J. Arthroplast. 2011, 26(1):152-160.
50. Walker P.S., Heller Y., Yildirim G., Immerman I. Reference axes for comparing the motion of knee replacements with the anatomic knee. Knee 2011, 18:312-316.
51. Walker P.S., Lowry M.T., Kumar A. The effect of geometric variations in posterior-stabilized knee designs on motion characteristics measured in a knee loading machine. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 2014, 472:238-247.
52. Willing R., Kim I.Y. The development, calibration and validation of a numerical total knee replacement kinematics simulator considering laxity and unconstrained flexion motions. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2012, 15(6):585-593.
53. Yildirim G., Fernandez-Madrid I., Schwarzkopf R., Walker P.S., Karia R. Comparison of robot surgery modular and total knee arthroplasty kinematics. J. Knee Surg. 2014, 27:157-163.
54. Yildirim G., Walker P.S., Boyer J. Total knees designed for normal kinematics evaluated in an up-and-down crouching machine. J. Orthop. Res. 2009, 27:1022-1027.
55. Zelle J., Barink M., De Waal M.M., Verdonschot N. Thigh-calf contact: does it affect the loading of the knee in the high-flexion range?. J. Biomech. 2009, 42(5):587-593.