Reference axes for comparing the motion of knee replacements with the anatomic knee

Knee

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 312-316

  Walker, P S ^a   Heller, Y ^a   Yildirim, G ^a   Immerman, I ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Knee axes; Knee contact areas; Knee kinematics; Knee motion; Total knee kinematics

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; JOINT FUNCTION; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SHEAR STRESS; TORQUE;

AGED; ARTHROMETRY, ARTICULAR; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CADAVER; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REFERENCE STANDARDS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 80052099819     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Grood E.S., Suntay W.J. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. Transactions of the ASME 1983, 105:136-144.
2. Rovick J.S., Reuben J.D., Schrager R.J., Walker P.S. Relation between knee motion and ligament length patterns. Clin Biomech 1991, 6(4):213-220.
3. Lenz N.M., Mane A., Maletsky L.P., Morton N.A. The effects of femoral fixed body coordinate system definition on knee kinematic description. J Biomech Eng 2008, 130(2):0221014.
4. Kurosawa H., Walker P.S., Abe S., Garg A., Hunter T. Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design. J Biomech 1985, 18(7):487-499.
5. Hollister A.M., Jatana S., Singh A.K., Sullivan W.M., Lupichuk A.G. The axes of rotation of the knee. Clin Ortho Rel Res 1993, 290:259-268.
6. Churchill D.L., Incavo S.J., Johnson C.C., Beynnon B.D. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Ortho Rel Res. 1998, 356:111-118.
7. Eckhoff D., Hogan C., DeMatteo L., Robinson M., Bach J. Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 2007, 461:238-244.
8. Blankevoort L., Huiskes R., deLange A. Helical axes of passive knee joint motions. J Biomech 1990, 23(12):1219-1222.
9. Freeman M.A.R., Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 2005, 38:197-208.
10. Most E., Li G., Schule S., Sultan P., Park S.E., Zayontz S., Rubash H.E. The kinematics of fixed-and-mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2003, 418:197-207.
11. Most E., Axe J., Rubash H., Li G. Sensitivity of the knee joint kinematics calculation to selection of flexion axes. J. Biomechanics 2004, 37:1743-1748.
12. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Mahfouz M.R., Haas B.D., Stiehl J.B. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 418:37-57.
13. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Mahfouz M.R., Walker S.A., Tucker A. A multicenter analysis of axial femoro-tibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:180-189.
14. Banks S.A., Harman M.K., Bellemans J., Hodge W.A. Making sense of knee arthroplasty kinematics: news you can use. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(Suppl 4):64-72.
15. Li G., DeFrate L.E., Park S.E., Gill T.J., Rubash H.E. An investigation using dual-orthogonal fluoroscopy and magnetic resonance image-based computer models. Am, J Sports Med 2005, 33(1):102-107.
16. Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 410:69-81.
17. Ahmed A.M., Burke D.L. In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints - part 1: tibial surface of the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983, 105:216-225.
18. Sathasivam S., Walker P.S. Computer model to predict subsurface damage in tibial inserts of total knees. J Orthop Res 1998, 16(5):564-571.
19. Fregly B.J., Banks S.A., D'Lima D.D., Colwell C.W. Sensitivity of knee replacement contact calculations to kinematic measurement errors. J Ortho Surg 2008, (Sept):1173-1179.
20. Walker P.S., Yildirim G., Sussman-Fort J., Klein G.R. Relative positions of the contacts on the cartilage surfaces of the knee joint. The Knee 2006, 13:382-388.
21. Walker, P.S., Heller, Y., Cleary, D.J., Yildirim, G. Pre-Clinical evaluation method for total knees designed to restore normal knee mechanics. J Arthroplasty, ePublished, April 2010.
22. Incavo S.J., Coughlin K.M., Pappas C., Beynnon B.D. Anatomic rotational relationships of the proximal tibia, distal femur, and patella: implications for rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(5):643-648.
23. Kinzel V., Ledger M., Shakespeare D. Can the epicondylar axis be defined accurately in total knee arthoplasty?. The Knee 2005, 12:293-296.
24. Iranpour F., Merican A.M., Dandachli W., Amis A.A., Cobb J.P. The geometry of thr trochlea groove. Clin Ortho Rel Res 2010, 4(68):782-788.