The development, calibration and validation of a numerical total knee replacement kinematics simulator considering laxity and unconstrained flexion motions

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 585-593

  Willing, Ryan ^a   Kim, Il Yong ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Kinematics; Laxity; Multibody analysis; Optimisation; Total knee replacement

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATED MODEL; CALIBRATION AND VALIDATIONS; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; DESIGN STAGE; FRICTION MODELS; IMPLANT DESIGN; LAXITY; MULTI-BODY; OPTIMISATION METHOD; OPTIMISATIONS; PHYSICAL TESTING; SIMULATION PARAMETERS; TKR KINEMATICS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DESIGN; EXPERIMENTS; FRICTION; KINEMATICS; OPTIMIZATION; PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

KNEE PROSTHESES;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CALIBRATION; HUMAN; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; CALIBRATION; HUMANS; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84860786017     PISSN: 10255842     EISSN: 14768259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2010.550888     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. ASTM Standard F1223. 2005. Standard test method for determination of total knee replacement constraint. West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM Internation. DOI: 10.1520/F1223-05, www.astm.org.
2. Barink M, van Kampen A, de Waal Malefijit M, Verdonschot N. 2005. A three-dimensional finite element model of the prosthetic knee joint: simulation of joint laxity and kinematics. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H: J Eng Med. 219(6):415-424.
3. Essinger JR, Leyvraz PF, Heegard JH, Robertson DD. 1989. A mathematical model for the evaluation of the behaviour during flexion of condylar-type knee prostheses. J Biomech. 22(11-12):1229-1241.
4. Fisher J, Dowson D. 1991. Tribology of total artificial joints. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H: J Eng Med. 205(28):73-79.
5. Garg A, Walker PS. 1990. Prediction of total knee motion using a three-dimensional computer-graphics model. J Biomech. 23(1):45-58.
6. Godest A-C, Simonis de Cloke C, Taylor M, Gregson PJ, Keane AJ, Sathasivam S, Walker PS. 2000. A computational model for the prediction of total knee replacement kinematics in the sagittal plane. J Biomech. 33(4):435-442.
7. Haider H, Walker PS. 2005. Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. J Biomech. 38(2):341-348.
8. Klein R, Serpe L, Kester MA, Edidin A, Fishkin Z, Mahoney OM, Schmalzried TP. 2003. Rotational constraint in posterior-stabilized total knee prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 410:82-89.
9. Laz PJ, Pak S, Halloran JP, Petrella AJ, Rullkoetter PJ. 2006. Probabilistic finite element prediction of knee wear simulator mechanics. J Biomech. 39(12):2303-2310.
10. Lew WD, Lewis JL. 1982. The effect of knee-prosthesis geometry on cruciate ligament mechanics during flexion. J Bone Joint Surg. 64(5):734-739.
11. Luger L, Sathasivam S, Walker PS. 1997. Inherent differences in the laxity and stability between the intact knee and total knee replacements. Knee. 4(1):7-14.
12. Moran MF, Bhimji S, Racanelli J, Piazza SJ. 2008. Computational assessment of constraint in total knee replacement. J Biomech. 41(9):2013-2020.
13. Mow VC, Soslowsky LJ. 1991. Friction, lubrication & wear of diarthrodial joints. In: Basic orthopaedic biomechanics. Chapter 6. New York (NY): Raven Press.
14. Sathasivam S, Walker PS. 1997. A computer model with surface friction for the prediction of total knee kinematics. J Biomech. 30(2):177-184.
15. Thatcher JC, Zhou XM, Walker PS. 1987. Inherent laxity in total knee prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 2(3):199-207.
16. Walker PS, Garg A. 1991. Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a computer analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 262:227-235.
17. Walker PS, Haider H. 2003. Characterizing the motion of total knee replacements in laboratory tests. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 410:54-68.