Effects of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on In Vivo, Dynamic Knee Function

Clinics in Sports Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 47-59

  Tashman, Scott ^a,b   Araki, Daisuke ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^c KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Anatomic; Anterior cruciate ligament; Double bundle; Dynamic stereo X ray system; In vivo knee kinematics; Knee; Single bundle

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURY; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; PERFORMANCE; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; BIOMECHANICS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; KNEE INJURIES; KNEE JOINT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 84869797233     PISSN: 02785919     EISSN: 1556228X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.08.006     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Biau D.J., Tournoux C., Katsahian S., et al. ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of functional scores. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 458:180-187.
2. Freedman K.B., D'Amato M.J., Nedeff D.D., et al. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 2003, 31(1):2-11.
3. Daniel D.M., Stone M.L., Dobson B.E., et al. Fate of the ACL-injured patient: a prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 1994, 22(5):632-644.
4. Kessler M.A., Behrend H., Henz S., et al. Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16(5):442-448.
5. Lohmander L.S., Ostenberg A., Englund M., et al. High prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, pain, and functional limitations in female soccer players twelve years after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50(10):3145-3152.
6. Andriacchi T.P., Mundermann A., Smith R.L., et al. A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee. Ann Biomed Eng 2004, 32(3):447-457.
7. Tochigi Y., Vaseenon T., Heiner A.D., et al. Instability dependency of osteoarthritis development in a rabbit model of graded anterior cruciate ligament transection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93(7):640-647.
8. Dye S.F. The knee as a biologic transmission with an envelope of function: a theory. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, (325):10-18.
9. Musahl V., Hoshino Y., Becker R., et al. Rotatory knee laxity and the pivot shift. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012, 20(4):601.
10. Snyder-Mackler L., Fitzgerald G.K., Bartolozzi A.R., et al. The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 1997, 25(2):191-195.
11. Harter R.A., Osternig L.R., Singer K.M. Long-term evaluation of knee stability and function following surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 1988, 16:434-443.
12. Barber S.D., Noyes F.R., Mangine R.E., et al. Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990, 255:204-214.
13. Seto J.L., Orofino A.S., Morrissey M.C. Assessment of quadriceps/hamstring strength, knee ligament stability, functional and sports activity levels five years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1988, 16:170-180.
14. Cross M.J., Wootton J.R., Bokor D.J. Acute repair of injury to the anterior cruciate ligament: a long-term followup. Am J Sports Med 1993, 21:128-131.
15. Andriacchi T.P., Dyrby C.O. Interactions between kinematics and loading during walking for the normal and ACL deficient knee. J Biomech 2005, 38(2):293-298.
16. Moro-oka T.A., Hamai S., Miura H., et al. Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 2008, 26(4):428-434.
17. van Dommelen J.A., Jolandan M.M., Ivarsson B.J., et al. Nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of human knee ligaments subjected to complex loading histories. Ann Biomed Eng 2006, 34(6):1008-1018.
18. Dortmans L., Jans H., Sauren A., et al. Nonlinear dynamic behavior of the human knee joint. Part II: time-domain analyses: effects of structural damage in postmortem experiments. J Biomech Eng 1991, 113(4):392-396.
19. Hosseini A., Gill T.J., Li G. In vivo anterior cruciate ligament elongation in response to axial tibial loads. J Orthop Sci 2009, 14(3):298-306.
20. Wu J.L., Hosseini A., Kozanek M., et al. Kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament during gait. Am J Sports Med 2010, 38(7):1475-1482.
21. Beynnon B.D., Fleming B.C. Anterior cruciate ligament strain in-vivo: a review of previous work. J Biomech 1998, 31(6):519-525.
22. Gao B., Zheng N.N. Investigation of soft tissue movement during level walking: translations and rotations of skin markers. J Biomech 2008, 41(15):3189-3195.
23. Holden J.P., Orsini J.A., Siegel K.L., et al. Surface movement errors in shank kinematics and knee kinetics during gait. Gait Posture 1997, 5:217-227.
24. Manal K., Davis I.M., Galinat B., et al. The accuracy of estimating proximal tibial translation during natural cadence walking: bone vs. skin mounted targets. Clin Biomech 2003, 18(2):126-131.
25. Li G., Van de Velde S.K., Bingham J.T. Validation of a non-invasive fluoroscopic imaging technique for the measurement of dynamic knee joint motion. J Biomech 2008, 41(7):1616-1622.
26. Tashman S. Comments on "validation of a non-invasive fluoroscopic imaging technique for the measurement of dynamic knee joint motion". J Biomech 2008, 41(15):3290-3291. [author reply: 3292-3].
27. Tashman S., Bey M., Anderst W.J., et al. Model-based tracking of knee kinematics from biplane radiographs: in-vivo validation 2006, Orthopaedic Research Society, Chicago.
28. Anderst W., Zauel R., Bishop J., et al. Validation of three-dimensional model-based tibio-femoral tracking during running. Med Eng Phys 2009, 31(1):10-16.
29. Miranda D.L., Schwartz J.B., Loomis A.C., et al. Static and dynamic error of a biplanar videoradiography system using marker-based and markerless tracking techniques. J Biomech Eng 2011, 133(12):121002.
30. Girgis F.G., Marshall J.L., Monajem A. The cruciate ligaments of the knee joint. anatomical, functional and experimental analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975, (106):216-231.
31. Odensten M., Hamberg P., Nordin M., et al. Surgical or conservative treatment of the acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985, 198:87-93.
32. Chhabra A., Starman J.S., Ferretti M., et al. Anatomic, radiographic, biomechanical, and kinematic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and its two functional bundles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88(Suppl 4):2-10.
33. Ferretti A., Monaco E., Labianca L., et al. Double bundle or single bundle plus extra-articular tenodesis in ACL reconstruction? A CAOS Study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2008, 16(1):98.
34. Gabriel M.T., Wong E.K., Woo S.L., et al. Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads. J Orthop Res 2004, 22(1):85-89.
35. Tischer T., Ronga M., Tsai A., et al. Biomechanics of the goat three bundle anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009, 17(8):935-940.
36. Abebe E.S., Moorman C.T., Dziedzic T.S., et al. Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques. Am J Sports Med 2009, 37(10):1904-1911.
37. Kopf S., Forsythe B., Wong A.K., et al. Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional transtibial single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(6):1427-1431.
38. Araki D., Kuroda R., Kubo S., et al. A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop 2011, 35(3):439-446.
39. Yagi M., Kuroda R., Nagamune K., et al. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 454:100-107.
40. Logan M., Dunstan E., Robinson J., et al. Tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient weightbearing, living knee employing vertical access open "interventional" multiple resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32(3):720-726.
41. Georgoulis A.D., Papadonikolakis A., Papageorgiou C.D., et al. Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and reconstructed knee during walking. Am J Sports Med 2003, 31(1):75-79.
42. Ristanis S., Giakas G., Papageorgiou C.D., et al. The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003, 11(6):360-365.
43. Brandsson S., Karlsson J., Sward L., et al. Kinematics and laxity of the knee joint after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: pre- and postoperative radiostereometric studies. Am J Sports Med 2002, 30(3):361-367.
44. Papannagari R., Gill T.J., Defrate L.E., et al. In vivo kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a clinical and functional evaluation. Am J Sports Med 2006, 34(12):2006-2012.
45. Tashman S. Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32(4):975-983.
46. Tashman S., Kolowich P., Collon D., et al. Dynamic function of the ACL-reconstructed knee during running. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 454:66-73.
47. Mae T., Shino K., Miyama T., et al. Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 2001, 17(7):708-716.
48. Yagi M., Wong E.K., Kanamori A., et al. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2002, 30(5):660-666.
49. Hamada M., Shino K., Horibe S., et al. Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endobutton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 2001, 17(8):801-807.
50. Adachi N., Ochi M., Uchio Y., et al. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86(4):515-520.
51. Yasuda K., Kondo E., Ichiyama H., et al. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 2006, 22(3):240-251.
52. Yamamoto Y., Hsu W.H., Woo S.L., et al. Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32(8):1825-1832.
53. Ho J.Y., Gardiner A., Shah V., et al. Equal kinematics between central anatomic single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Arthroscopy 2009, 25(5):464-472.
54. Irrgang J.J., Bost J.E., Fu F.H. Re: Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2009, 37(2):421-422. [author reply: 422].
55. Meredick R.B., Vance K.J., Appleby D., et al. Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2008, 36(7):1414-1421.
56. Abebe E.S., Utturkar G.M., Taylor D.C., et al. The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Biomech 2011, 44(5):924-929.
57. Claes S., Neven E., Callewaert B., et al. Tibial rotation in single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a kinematic 3-D in vivo analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011, 19(Suppl 1):S115-S121.
58. Ristanis S., Stergiou N., Siarava E., et al. Effect of femoral tunnel placement for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament on tibial rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009, 91(9):2151-2158.
59. Tsarouhas A., Iosifidis M., Kotzamitelos D., et al. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic analysis of knee rotational stability after single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2010, 26(7):885-893.
60. Misonoo G., Kanamori A., Ida H., et al. Evaluation of tibial rotational stability of single-bundle vs. anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during a high-demand activity - a quasi-randomized trial. Knee 2012, 19(2):87-93.
61. Irrgang J.J., Tashman S., Moore C., Fu F.H. Challenge accepted: description of an ongoing NIH-funded randomized clinical trial to compare anatomic single-bundle versus anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2012, 28(6):747-748.
62. Pappas E., Zampeli F., Xergia S.A., et al. Lessons learned from the last 20 years of ACL-related in vivo-biomechanics research of the knee joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012, [Epub ahead of print].
63. Garling E.H., Kaptein B.L., Mertens B., et al. Soft-tissue artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and skin-mounted markers. J Biomech 2007, 40(Suppl 1):S18-S24.
64. Lorenz S., Tashman S., Fu F.H. Failed exploration of rotational instability in single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2009, 25(9):949. [author reply: 949-50].
65. Hoshino Y., Kuroda R., Nagamune K., et al. In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 2007, 35(7):1098-1104.
66. Araki D., Kuroda R., Kubo S., et al. The use of an electromagnetic measurement system for anterior tibial displacement during the Lachman test. Arthroscopy 2011, 27(6):792-802.
67. Georgoulis A.D., Ristanis S., Chouliaras V., et al. Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 454:89-94.