Preclinical Evaluation Method for Total Knees Designed to Restore Normal Knee Mechanics

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 152-160

  Walker, Peter S ^a   Heller, Yonah ^a   Cleary, David J ^a   Yildirim, Gokce ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Knee laxity; Knee stability; Normal knee kinematics; Total knee arthroplasty; Total knee function; Total knee kinematics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEMUR SHAFT; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; KNEE; KNEE FUNCTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR;

EID: 78649991065     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Robinson R.P. The early innovators of today's resurfacing condylar knees. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:2.
2. Weiss J.M., Noble P.C., Conditt M.A., et al. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements?. Clin Orthop 2002, 404:172.
3. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Mahfouz M.R., et al. Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2003, 416:37.
4. Blaha J.D. The rationale for a total knee implant that confers anteroposterior stability throughout range of motion. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(4 Suppl 1):22.
5. Schmidt R., Komistek R.D., Blaha J.D., et al. Fluoroscopic analyses of cruciate-retaining and medial pivot knee implants. Clin Orthop 2003, 410:139.
6. Ries M., Victor J., Bellemans J., et al. Effect of guided knee motion and high flexion TKA on kinematics, implant stresses, and wear 2006.
7. Victor J., Bellemans J. Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clin Orthop 2006, 452:53.
8. Walker P.S. A new concept in guided motion total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16(8)(Suppl 1):157.
9. Walker P.S., Sussman-Fort J.M., Yildirim G., et al. Design features of total knees for achieving normal knee motion characteristics. J Arthroplasty 2008, Epub ahead of print April; awaiting print.
10. Haider H., Walker P.S. Measurements of constraint of total knee replacement. J Biomech 2005, 38:341.
11. Haider H., Walker P.S., DesJardins J.D., et al. Effects of patient and surgical alignment variables on kinematics in TKR simulation under force-control. J ASTM International 2006, 3:3.
12. DesJardins J.D., Banks S.A., Benson L.C., et al. A direct comparison of patient and force-controlled simulator total knee replacement kinematics. J Biomech 2007, 440:3458.
13. Moran M.F., Bhimji S., Racanelli J., et al. Computational assessment of constraint in total knee replacement. J Biomech 2008, 41:2013.
14. Eckhoff D., Hogan C., DeMatteo L., et al. Difference between the epicondylar and cylindrical axis of the knee. Clin Orthop 2007, 461:238.
15. Komistek R.D., Dennis D.A., Mahfouz M. In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of the normal human knee. Clin Orthop 2003, 410:69.
16. Li G., Zayontz S., DeFrate L.E., et al. Kinematics of the knee at high flexion angles: an in vitro investigation. J Otrtho Res 2004, 22:90.
17. Freeman M.A.R., Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 2005, 38:197.
18. Moro-oka T.A., Hamai S., Miura H., et al. Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics. J Orthop Res 2008, 26:428.
19. Dennis D., Komistek R., Scuderi G., et al. In vivo three-dimensional determination of kinematics for subjects with a normal knee or a unicompartmental or total knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg (A) 2001, 83:S104.
20. D'Lima D.D., Patil S., Steklov N., et al. In vivo knee forces after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2005, 440:45.
21. D'Lima D.D., Patil S., Steklov N., et al. Tibial forces measured in vivo after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:255.
22. D'Lima D.D., Patil S., Steklov N., et al. In vivo knee moments and shear after total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2007, 40:S11.
23. Zhao D., Banks S.A., D'Lima D.D., et al. In vivo medial and lateral tibial loads during dynamic and high flexion activities. J Orthop Res 2007, 593.
24. Mündermann A., Dyrby C.O., D'Lima D.D., et al. In vivo knee loading characteristics during activities of daily living as measured by an instrumented total knee replacement. J Orthop Res 2008, 26:1167.
25. Heinlein B., Kutzner I., Graichen F., et al. Complete data of total knee replacement loading for level walking and stair climbing measured in vivo with a follow-up of 6-10 months. Clin Biomech 2009, 24:315.
26. Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Mahfouz M.R., et al. A multicenter analysis of axial femorotibial rotation after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2004, 428:180.
27. Banks S.A., Harman M.K., Bellemans J., et al. Making sense of knee arthroplasty kinematics: news you can use. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(Suppl 4):64.
28. Walker P.S., Wang C.J., Masse Y. Joint laxity as a criterion for the design of condylar knee prostheses. Clin Orthop 2003, 410:5.
29. Hsieh H.H., Walker P.S. Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. J.Bone Joint Surg 1976, 58-A:87.
30. Markolf K.L., Bargar W.L., Shoemaker S.C., et al. The role of the joint load in knee stability. J Bone Joint Surg 1981, 63-A:570.
31. Fukubayashi T., Torzilli P.A., Sherman M.F., et al. An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. J. Bone Joint Surg 1982, 64-A:258.
32. Justin D.F., Mann J.W., Winters T.F. Evaluation of a tibial component with external rotation of the intercondylar eminence 1992.