Comparison of static and dynamic knee kinematics during squatting

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 106-108

  Mu, S ^a   Moro Oka, T ^a,b   Johal, P ^c   Hamai, S ^a,b   Freeman, M A R ^d   Banks, S A ^a  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

^b KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d ROYAL LONDON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dynamic motion; Healthy knee; Kinematics; Squatting; Static motion

Indexed keywords

ANTEROPOSTERIOR; BEST FIT; DIRECT OBSERVATION; DYNAMIC MOTIONS; DYNAMIC OBSERVATION; DYNAMIC WEIGHT; EXTERNAL ROTATION; FEMORAL CONDYLES; FLUOROSCOPIC IMAGING; HEALTHY KNEE; KNEE KINEMATICS; MEDIAL FEMORAL CONDYLE; SOFT TISSUE; SQUATTING; STATIC AND DYNAMIC; STATIC MOTION;

KINEMATICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RESONANCE; ROTATION;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMIC SQUATTING; FEMUR CONDYLE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; JOINT MOBILITY; KINEMATICS; KNEE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROTATION; STATIC SQUATTING; TISSUE STRUCTURE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICS; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MOTION; MOVEMENT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; ROTATION; WEIGHT-BEARING; X-RAYS;

EID: 78650895844     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. D.G. Eckhoff, J.M. Bach, V.M. Spitzer, K.D. Reinig, M.M. Bagur, and T.H. Baldini Three-dimensional morphology and kinematics of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality. Part II Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-America 85 Supplement 4 2003 97 104
2. S.G. Elias, M.A. Freeman, and E.I. Gokcay A correlative study of the geometry and anatomy of the distal femur Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 260 1990 98 103
3. P. Johal, A. Williams, P. Wragg, D. Hunt, and W. Gedroyc Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI Journal of Biomechanics 38 2005 269 276
4. H. Kurosawa, P.S. Walker, S. Abe, A. Garg, and T. Hunter Geometry and motion of the knee for implant and orthotic design Journal of Biomechanics 18 1985 487 499 (Pubitemid 15017687)
5. G. Li, L.E. DeFrate, S.E. Park, T.J. Gill, and H.E. Rubash In vivo articular cartilage contact kinematics of the knee American Journal of Sports Medicine 33 2005 102 107
6. T. Moro-oka, S. Hamai, H. Miura, T. Shimoto, H. Higaki, and B.J. Fregly Can magnetic resonance imaging-derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with single-plane three-dimensional shape registration? Journal of Orthopaedic Research 25 2007 867 872
7. T. Moro-oka, S. Hamai, H. Miura, H. Miura, T. Shimoto, and H. Higaki Dynamic activity dependence of in vivo normal knee kinematics Journal of Orthopaedic Research 26 2008 428 434
8. V. Pinskerova, P. Johal, S. Nakagawa, A. Sosna, A. Williams, and W. Gedroyc Does the femur roll-back with flexion? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-British 86 2004 925 931
9. J. Yao, S.L. Lancianese, K.R. Hovinga, J. Lee, and A.L. Lerner Magnetic resonance image analysis of meniscal translation and tibio-menisco-femoral contact in deep knee flexion Journal of Orthopaedic Research 26 2008 673 684