Aneuploidy-induced cellular stresses limit autophagic degradation

Genes and Development

Volumn 29, Issue 19, 2015, Pages 2010-2021

  Santaguida, Stefano ^a   Vasile, Eliza ^a   White, Eileen ^b   Amon, Angelika ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Autophagy; Cancer; Proteotoxicity; TFEB

Indexed keywords

PROTEASOME; PROTEIN AGGREGATE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR TFEB; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BASIC HELIX LOOP HELIX LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TFEB PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ANEUPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; AUTOPHAGOSOME; AUTOPHAGY; CELL STRESS; CELLULAR STRESS RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE ACTIVATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; LYSOSOME; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; CELL LINE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN FOLDING;

ANEUPLOIDY; AUTOPHAGY; BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; CELL LINE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; LYSOSOMES; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN AGGREGATES; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEOLYSIS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84943560653     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.269118.115     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bagatell R,Whitesell L. 2004. Altered Hsp90 function in cancer: a uniquetherapeuticopportunity.MolCancerTher 3:1021-1030.
2. Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, Kim SY, Moody SE, Dunn IF, Schinzel AC, Sandy P, Meylan E, Scholl C, et al. 2009. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature 461: 108-112.
3. Bjorkoy G. 2005. p62/SQSTM1forms protein aggregates degraded by autophagy and has a protective effect on huntingtininduced cell death. J Cell Biol 171: 603-614.
4. Davoli T, Xu AW, Mengwasser KE, Sack LM, Yoon JC, Park PJ, Elledge SJ. 2013. Cumulative haploinsufficiency and triplosensitivity drive aneuploidy patterns and shape the cancer genome. Cell 155: 948-962.
5. Dephoure N, Hwang S, O'Sullivan C, Dodgson SE, Gygi SP, Amon A, Torres EM. 2014. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. eLife 3: e03023.
6. Ditchfield C, Johnson VL, Tighe A, Ellston R, Haworth C, Johnson T, Mortlock A, Keen N, Taylor SS. 2003. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and Cenp-E to kinetochores. J Cell Biol 161: 267-280.
7. Donnelly N, Passerini V, Dürrbaum M, Stingele S, Storchova Z. 2014. HSF1 deficiency and impaired HSP90-dependent protein folding are hallmarks of aneuploid human cells. EMBO J 33: 2374-2387.
8. Fry RC, Svensson JP, Valiathan C, Wang E, Hogan BJ, Bhattacharya S, Bugni JM, Whittaker CA, Samson LD. 2008. Genomic predictors of interindividual differences in response to DNA damaging agents. Genes Dev 22: 2621-2626.
9. Gasch AP, Spellman PT, Kao CM, Carmel-Harel O, Eisen MB, Storz G, Botstein D, Brown PO. 2000. Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. Mol Biol Cell 11: 4241-4257.
10. Gordon DJ, Resio B, Pellman D. 2012. Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 13: 189-203.
11. Guo JY, Xia B, White E. 2013. Autophagy-mediated tumor promotion. Cell 155: 1216-1219.
12. Hewitt L, Tighe A, Santaguida S, White AM, Jones CD, Musacchio A, Green S, Taylor SS. 2010. Sustained Mps1 activity is required in mitosis to recruit O-Mad2 to the Mad1-C-Mad2 core complex. J Cell Biol 190: 25-34.
13. Holland AJ, Cleveland DW. 2009. Boveri revisited: chromosomal instability, aneuploidy and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 478-487.
14. KabeyaY, Mizushima N, Ueno T, Yamamoto A, KirisakoT, Noda T, Kominami E, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T. 2000. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J 19: 5720-5728.
15. Klionsky DJ. 2007. Autophagy: from phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 931-937.
16. Klionsky DJ, Abdalla FC, Abeliovich H, Abraham RT, Acevedo- Arozena A, Adeli K, Agholme L, Agnello M, Agostinis P, Aguirre-Ghiso JA, et al. 2012. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy. Autophagy 8: 445-544.
17. Lamark T, Johansen T. 2012. Aggrephagy: selective disposal of protein aggregates by macroautophagy. Int J Cell Biol 2012: 1-21.
18. Mizushima N. 2004. Methods for monitoring autophagy. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36: 2491-2502.
19. Mizushima N, Yoshimori T. 2007. How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy 3: 542-545.
20. Moscat J, Diaz-Meco MT, Wooten MW. 2007. Signal integration and diversification through the p62 scaffold protein. Trends Biochem Sci 32: 95-100.
21. Murphy ME. 2013. The HSP70 family and cancer. Carcinogenesis 34: 1181-1188.
22. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. 2007. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 379-393.
23. Nimmerjahn F, Milosevic S, Behrends U, Jaffee EM, Pardoll DM, Bornkamm GW, Mautner J. 2003. Major histocompatibility complex class II-restricted presentation of a cytosolic antigen by autophagy. Eur J Immunol 33: 1250-1259.
24. Oromendia AB, Amon A. 2014. Aneuploidy: implications for protein homeostasis and disease. Dis Model Mech 7: 15-20.
25. Oromendia AB, Dodgson SE, Amon A. 2012. Aneuploidy causes proteotoxic stress in yeast. Genes Dev 26: 2696-2708.
26. Pavelka N, Rancati G, Zhu J, Bradford WD, Saraf A, Florens L, Sanderson BW, Hattem GL, Li R. 2010. Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast. Nature 468: 321-325.
27. Santagata S, Mendillo ML, Tang YC, Subramanian A, Perley CC, Roche SP,Wong B, Narayan R, Kwon H, Koeva M, et al. 2013. Tight coordination of protein translation and HSF1 activation supports the anabolic malignant state. Science 341: 1238303.
28. Santaguida S, Amon A. 2015. Short- and long-termeffects of chromosome mis-segregation and aneuploidy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16: 473-485.
29. Santaguida S, Tighe A, D'Alise AM, Taylor SS, Musacchio A. 2010. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J Cell Biol 190: 73-87.
30. Schvartzman J-M, Sotillo R, Benezra R. 2010. Mitotic chromosomal instability and cancer: mouse modelling of the human disease. Nat Rev Cancer 10: 102-115.
31. Settembre C, Di Malta C, Polito VA, Arencibia MG, Vetrini F, Erdin S, Erdin SU, Huynh T, Medina D, Colella P, et al. 2011. TFEB links autophagy to lysosomal biogenesis. Science 332: 1429-1433.
32. Settembre C, Zoncu R, Medina DL, Vetrini F, Erdin S, Erdin S, Huynh T, Ferron M, Karsenty G, Vellard MC, et al. 2012. A lysosome- to-nucleus signalling mechanism senses and regulates the lysosome via mTOR and TFEB. EMBO J 31: 1095-1108.
33. Settembre C, Fraldi A, Medina DL, Ballabio A. 2013. Signals from the lysosome: a control centre for cellular clearance and energy metabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 283-296.
34. Sheltzer JM, Amon A. 2011. The aneuploidy paradox: costs and benefits of an incorrect karyotype. Trends Genet 27: 446-453.
35. Sheltzer JM, Torres EM, Dunham MJ, Amon A. 2012. Transcriptional consequences of aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109: 12644-12649.
36. Siegel JJ, Amon A. 2012. New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28: 189-214.
37. Stingele S, Stoehr G, Peplowska K, Cox J, Mann M, Storchova Z. 2012. Global analysis of genome, transcriptome and proteome reveals the response to aneuploidy in human cells. Mol Syst Biol 8: 608.
38. Stingele S, Stoehr G, Storchova Z. 2013. Activation of autophagy in cells with abnormal karyotype. Autophagy 9: 246-248.
39. Suraweera A, Münch C, Hanssum A, Bertolotti A. 2012. Failure of amino acid homeostasis causes cell death following proteasome inhibition. Mol Cell 48: 242-253.
40. Tang Y-C,Williams BR, Siegel JJ, Amon A. 2011. Identification of aneuploidy-selective antiproliferation compounds. Cell 144: 499-512.
41. Thompson SL, Compton DA. 2010. Proliferation of aneuploid human cells is limited by a p53-dependent mechanism. J Cell Biol 188: 369-381.
42. Thorburn RR, Gonzalez C, Brar GA, Christen S, Carlile TM, IngoliaNT, Sauer U, Weissman JS, AmonA. 2013. Aneuploid yeast strains exhibit defects in cell growth and passage through START. Mol Biol Cell 24: 1274-1289.
43. Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, Chan LY, Boselli M, Dunham MJ, Amon A. 2007. Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317: 916-924.
44. Torres EM, Williams BR, Amon A. 2008. Aneuploidy: cells losing their balance. Genetics 179: 737-746.
45. Torres EM, Dephoure N, Panneerselvam A, Tucker CM, Whittaker CA, Gygi SP, Dunham MJ, AmonA. 2010. Identification of aneuploidy-tolerating mutations. Cell 143: 71-83.
46. Tyedmers J, Mogk A, Bukau B. 2010. Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 777-788.
47. Weaver BAA, Cleveland DW. 2006. Does aneuploidy cause cancer? Curr Opin Cell Biol 18: 658-667.
48. White E. 2012. Deconvoluting the context-dependent role for autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 401-410.
49. Williams BR, Prabhu VR, Hunter KE, Glazier CM, Whittaker CA, Housman DE, Amon A. 2008. Aneuploidy affects proliferation and spontaneous immortalization in mammalian cells. Science 322: 703-709.
50. Xie Z, Klionsky DJ. 2007. Autophagosome formation: core machinery and adaptations. Nat Cell Biol 9: 1102-1109.
51. Zoncu R, Bar-Peled L, Efeyan A, Wang S, Sancak Y, Sabatini DM. 2011. mTORC1 senses lysosomal amino acids through an inside- out mechanism that requires the vacuolar H+-ATPase. Science 334: 678-683.