USP15 regulates SMURF2 kinetics through C-lobe mediated deubiquitination

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Iyengar, Prasanna Vasudevan ^a   Jaynes, Patrick ^a   Rodon, Laura ^b   Lama, Dilraj ^c   Law, Kai Pong ^d   Lim, Yoon Pin ^d   Verma, Chandra ^c,e,f   Seoane, Joan ^b   Eichhorn, Pieter Johan Adam ^a,d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b VALL D HEBRON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Spain)

^c BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^e NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^f NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEUBIQUITINASE; LYSINE; SMURF2 PROTEIN, HUMAN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; USP15 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL MOTION; HEK293 CELL LINE; HUMAN; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITINATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL MOVEMENT; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; KINETICS; LYSINE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEOLYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; UBIQUITIN-SPECIFIC PROTEASES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 84943338483     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep14733     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Deshaies, R. J. & Joazeiro, C. A. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annual review of biochemistry 78, 399-434, doi: 10.1146/ annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809 (2009).
2. Scheffner, M., Nuber, U. & Huibregtse, J. M. Protein ubiquitination involving an E1-E2-E3 enzyme ubiquitin thioester cascade. Nature 373, 81-83, doi: 10.1038/373081a0 (1995).
3. Massague, J. TGFbeta in Cancer. Cell 134, 215-230, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.001 (2008).
4. Massague, J., Seoane, J. & Wotton, D. Smad transcription factors. Genes & development 19, 2783-2810, doi: 10.1101/gad.1350705 (2005).
5. Kavsak, P. et al. Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF beta receptor for degradation. Molecular cell 6, 1365-1375 (2000).
6. Ogunjimi, A. A. et al. Regulation of Smurf2 ubiquitin ligase activity by anchoring the E2 to the HECT domain. Molecular cell 19, 297-308, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.028 (2005).
7. Wiesner, S. et al. Autoinhibition of the HECT-Type ubiquitin ligase Smurf2 through its C2 domain. Cell 130, 651-662, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.050 (2007).
8. Zhang, L. et al. USP4 is regulated by AKT phosphorylation and directly deubiquitylates TGF-beta type I receptor. Nature cell biology 14, 717-726, doi: 10.1038/ncb2522 (2012).
9. Eichhorn, P. J. et al. USP15 stabilizes TGF-beta receptor I and promotes oncogenesis through the activation of TGF-beta signaling in glioblastoma. Nature medicine 18, 429-435, doi: 10.1038/nm.2619 (2012).
10. Al-Salihi, M. A., Herhaus, L., Macartney, T. & Sapkota, G. P. USP11 augments TGFbeta signalling by deubiquitylating ALK5. Open biology 2, 120063, doi: 10.1098/rsob.120063 (2012).
11. Wicks, S. J. et al. The deubiquitinating enzyme UCH37 interacts with Smads and regulates TGF-beta signalling. Oncogene 24, 8080-8084, doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208944 (2005).
12. Zhang, L. et al. TRAF4 promotes TGF-beta receptor signaling and drives breast cancer metastasis. Molecular cell 51, 559-572, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.014 (2013).
13. Kamadurai, H. B. et al. Insights into ubiquitin transfer cascades from a structure of a UbcH5B approximately ubiquitin-HECT(NEDD4L) complex. Molecular cell 36, 1095-1102, doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.010 (2009).
14. Ogunjimi, A. A. et al. The ubiquitin binding region of the Smurf HECT domain facilitates polyubiquitylation and binding of ubiquitylated substrates. The Journal of biological chemistry 285, 6308-6315, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.044537 (2010).
15. French, M. E., Kretzmann, B. R. & Hicke, L. Regulation of the RSP5 ubiquitin ligase by an intrinsic ubiquitin-binding site. The Journal of biological chemistry 284, 12071-12079, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M901106200 (2009).
16. Inui, M. et al. USP15 is a deubiquitylating enzyme for receptor-Activated SMADs. Nature cell biology 13, 1368-1375, doi: 10.1038/ ncb2346 (2011).
17. Zhang, Y., Chang, C., Gehling, D. J., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. & Derynck, R. Regulation of Smad degradation and activity by Smurf2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 974-979, doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.974 (2001).
18. Woelk, T. et al. Molecular mechanisms of coupled monoubiquitination. Nature cell biology 8, 1246-1254, doi: 10.1038/ncb1484 (2006).
19. Aragon, E. et al. Structural basis for the versatile interactions of Smad7 with regulator WW domains in TGF-beta Pathways. Structure 20, 1726-1736, doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.07.014 (2012).
20. Li, M. et al. Deubiquitination of p53 by HAUSP is an important pathway for p53 stabilization. Nature 416, 648-653, doi: 10.1038/ nature737 (2002).
21. Li, M., Brooks, C. L., Kon, N. & Gu, W. A dynamic role of HAUSP in the p53-Mdm2 pathway. Molecular cell 13, 879-886 (2004).
22. Zou, Q. et al. USP15 stabilizes MDM2 to mediate cancer-cell survival and inhibit antitumor T cell responses. Nature immunology 15, 562-570, doi: 10.1038/ni.2885 (2014).
23. Blank, M. et al. A tumor suppressor function of Smurf2 associated with controlling chromatin landscape and genome stability through RNF20. Nature medicine 18, 227-234, doi: 10.1038/nm.2596 (2012).
24. Tang, L. Y. et al. Ablation of Smurf2 reveals an inhibition in TGF-beta signalling through multiple mono-ubiquitination of Smad3. The EMBO journal 30, 4777-4789, doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.393 (2011).
25. Nie, J. et al. Smad ubiquitylation regulatory factor 1/2 (Smurf1/2) promotes p53 degradation by stabilizing the E3 ligase MDM2. The Journal of biological chemistry 285, 22818-22830, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.126920 (2010).
26. Long, L. et al. The U4/U6 recycling factor SART3 has histone chaperone activity and associates with USP15 to regulate H2B deubiquitination. The Journal of biological chemistry 289, 8916-8930, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.551754 (2014).
27. Maspero, E. et al. Structure of a ubiquitin-loaded HECT ligase reveals the molecular basis for catalytic priming. Nature structural & molecular biology 20, 696-701, doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2566 (2013).
28. Kamadurai, H. B. et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin ligation and lysine prioritization by a HECT E3. eLife 2, e00828, doi: 10.7554/ eLife.00828 (2013).
29. Smith, M. P. et al. Effect of SMURF2 targeting on susceptibility to MEK inhibitors in melanoma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 105, 33-46, doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs471 (2013).
30. Penengo, L. et al. Crystal structure of the ubiquitin binding domains of rabex-5 reveals two modes of interaction with ubiquitin. Cell 124, 1183-1195, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.020 (2006).
31. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826, doi: 10.1126/science.1232033 (2013).
32. Krieger, E., Nabuurs, S. B. & Vriend, G. Homology modeling. Methods of biochemical analysis 44, 509-523 (2003).
33. Sali, A. & Blundell, T. L. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Journal of molecular biology 234, 779-815, doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 (1993).
34. Kuntal, B., Aparoy, P. & Reddanna, P. EasyModeller: A graphical interface to MODELLER. BMC Research Notes 3, 226 (2010).
35. de Vries, S. J., van Dijk, M. & Bonvin, A. M. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nature protocols 5, 883-897, doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.32 (2010).
36. Vanquelef, E. et al. R.E.D. Server: a web service for deriving RESP and ESP charges and building force field libraries for new molecules and molecular fragments. Nucleic acids research 39, W511-517, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr288 (2011).
37. Hornak, V. et al. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins 65, 712-725, doi: 10.1002/prot.21123 (2006).
38. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, W. R. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. Journal of Chemical Physics 79, 926-935 (1983).
39. Loncharich, R. J., Brooks, B. R. & Pastor, R. W. Langevin dynamics of peptides: the frictional dependence of isomerization rates of N-Acetylalanyl-N-methylamide. Biopolymers 32, 523-535, doi: 10.1002/bip.360320508 (1992).
40. Pastor, R. W., Brooks, B. R. & Szabo, A. An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms. Mol. Phys. 65, 1409-1419 (1988).
41. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., Van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. olecular Dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys 81, 3684-3690 (1984).
42. Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald-An Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 9 98, 10089-10092 (1993).
43. Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical Integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: Molecular dynamics of n-Alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327-341 (1977).
44. Shao, J., Tanner, S. W., Thompson, N. & Cheatham, T. E. Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: Characterizing the performance of different clustering algorithms. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 3, 2312-2334 (2007).