Correction to: Development of a Framework for Sustainable Outsourcing: Analytic Balanced Scorecard Method (A-BSC) (Sustainability, (2015), 7, 7, (8399-8419), 10.3390/su7078399);Development of a framework for sustainable outsourcing: Analytic balanced scorecard method (A-BSC)

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 8399-8419

  De Felice, Fabio ^a   Petrillo, Antonella ^b   Autorino, Claudio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CASSINO AND SOUTHERN LAZIO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES PARTHENOPE   (Italy)

Author keywords

AHP; BSC; Outsorcing; Performance analysis; Supply chain management; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; COST ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; OUTSOURCING; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84943279821     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su151310174     Document Type: Erratum

References (53)

1. Shokravi, S.; Kurnia, S. A Step towards Developing a Sustainability Performance Measure within Industrial Networks. Sustainability 2014, 6, 2201-2222.
2. Kang, M.; Wu, X.; Hong, P. Strategic outsourcing practices of multi-national corporations (MNCs) in China. Strateg. Outsourcing Int. J. 2009, 2, 240-256.
3. Shafiee, M.; Lotfi, F.H.; Saleh, H. Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Appl. Math. Model. 2014, 38, 5092-5112.
4. Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. HarvardBus 2006, 84, 76-92.
5. Hollos, D.; Blome, C.; Foerstl, K. Does sustainable supplier co-operation affect performance? Examining implications for the triple bottom line. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2012, 50, 2968-2986.
6. Brandenburg, M.; Rebs, T. Sustainable supply chain management: A modeling perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 2015, 229, 213-252.
7. Reefke, H.; Trocchi, M. Balanced scorecard for sustainable supply chains: Design and development guidelines. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manag. 2013, 62, 805-826.
8. Chen, I.J.; Paulraj, A. Understanding supply chain management: Critical research and a theoretical framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2004, 42, 131-163.
9. De Felice, F.; Petrillo, A. Key success factors for organizational innovation in the fashion industry. Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag. 2013, 5, 47-57.
10. Tseng, M.; Lim, M.; Wong, W.P. Sustainable supply chain management: A closed-loop network hierarchical approach. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2015, 115, 436-461.
11. Sainaghi, R.; Phillips, P.; Corti, V. Measuring hotel performance: Using a balanced scorecard perspectives' approach. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 34, 150-159.
12. Kaplan, R.; Norton, D. The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment; Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2001.
13. Varma, S.; Wadhwa, S.; Deshmukh, S.G. Evaluating petroleum supply chain performance. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist 2008, 20, 343-356.
14. Banker, R.D.; Chang, H.; Janakiraman, S.N.; Konstans, C. A balanced scorecard analysis of performance metrics. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 154, 423-436.
15. Kanga, J.-S.; Chiangb, C.-F.; Huangthanapanc, K.; Downing, S. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability balanced scorecard: The case study of family-owned hotels. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 48, 124-134.
16. Singh, S.; Olugu, E.U.; Musa, S.N.; Mahat, A.B. Fuzzy-based sustainability evaluation method for manufacturing SMEs using balanced scorecard framework. J. Intell. Manuf. 2015, doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1081-1.
17. Rabbani, A.; Zamani, M.; Yazdani-Chamzini, A.; Zavadskas, E.K. Proposing a new integrated model based on sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC) and MCDM approaches by using linguistic variables for the performance evaluation of oil producing companies. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 7316-7327.
18. Bhattacharya, A.; Mohapatra, P.; Kumar, V.; Dey, P.K.; Brady, M.; Tiwari, M.K.; Nudurupati, S.S. Green supply chain performance measurement using fuzzy ANP-based balanced scorecard: A collaborative decision-making approach. Prod. Plan. Control 2014, 25, 698-714.
19. Stankeviciene, J. Multi-attribute value measurement approach to assess business sustainability. Available online: http://www.linknovate.com/publication/multi-attribute-value-measurement-approach-to-assess-business-sustainability-1574262/(accessed on 22 June 2015).
20. Wang, Y. Research on performance evaluation of supply chain based on improved BSC. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineering, TMEE, Changchun, China, 16-18 December 2011; pp. 212-215.
21. De Felice, F.; Petrillo, A. Proposal of a structured methodology for the measure of intangible criteria and for decision making. Int. J. Simul. Process. Model. 2014, 9, 157-166.
22. Veronese Bentes, A.; Carneiro, J.; Ferreira da Silva, J.; Kimura, H. Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1790-1799.
23. Kumar, M.; Bhagwat, R. An integrated BSC-AHP approach for supply chain management evaluation. Meas. Bus. Excell. 2007, 11, 57-68.
24. Leung, L.; Lam, K.; Cao, D. Implementing the Balanced Scorecard using the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analytic Network Process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2006, 57, 682-691.
25. Wua, C.-R.; Lin, C.-T.; Tsai, P.-H. Evaluating business performance of wealth management banks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 207, 971-979.
26. Tjader, Y.; Maya, J.H.; Shang, J.; Vargas, L.G.; Gao, N. Firm-level outsourcing decision making: A balanced scorecard-based analytic Network process model. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014, 147, 614-623.
27. Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980.
28. Guo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Guo, W. The decision analysis evaluation of project investment based on BSC-AHP model. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences, ICCIS, Shiyang, China, 21-23 June 2013; pp. 414-417.
29. Saaty, T.L. Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks; RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2005.
30. Lambert, D.M.; Cooper, M.C. Issues in supply chain management. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2000, 29, 65-84.
31. Christoper, M. Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Services, 2nd ed.; Pitman Publishing: London, UK, 1998.
32. Gunasekaran, A.; Patel, C.; Ronald, E.; McGaughey, R. A framework for supply chain performance measurement. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004, 87, 333-348.
33. Chan, F.T.S.; Qi, H.J. An innovative performance measurement method for supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2003, 8, 209-223.
34. Chan, F.T.S. Performance measurement in a supply chain. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2003, 21, 534-548.
35. Fill, C.; Visser, E. The Outsourcing Dilemma: A Composite Approach to the Make or Buy Decision. Manag. Decis. 2000, 38, 43-50.
36. Costantino, F.; Di Gravio, G.; Nonino, F. Insights from action research: Implementing an innovative lean procurement framework for global sourcing. Int. Bus. Manag. 2015, 9, 416-424.
37. Handfield, R.B.; Nichols, E.L. Introduction to Supply Chain Management; Prentice Hall Inc.: Upper Saddle Riverm, NY, USA, 1999.
38. Costantino, F.; di Gravio, G.; Shaban, A. Multi-criteria logistics distribution network design for mass customization. Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci. 2014, 7, 151-167.
39. McIvor, R. Outsourcing: Insights from the Telecommunications Industry. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2003, 8, 380-394.
40. Mann, N. The Risks and Benefits of Outsourcing Supply Chain Management. Available online: http://www.businessbee.com/resources/operations/supplier-management/the-risks-and-benefits-of-outsourcing-supply-chain-management/(accessed on 22 June 2015).
41. Ishizaka, A.; Blakiston, R. The 18C's model for a successful long-term outsourcing arrangement. Ind. Market. Manag. 2012, 41, 1071-1080.
42. Amer, Y.; Luong, L.; Lee, S.; Wang, Y. A systems approach to order fulfillment using design for six sigma methodology. Int. J. Bus. Syst. Res. 2007, 1, 302-316.
43. Bourne, M.; Mills, J.; Wilcox, M.; Neely, A.; Platts, K. Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2000, 20, 754-771.
44. Ramaa, A.; Rangaswamy, T.; Subramanya, K. A review of literature on performance measurement of supply chain network. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Emerging Trends Engineering Technology, Nagpur, India, 16-18 December 2009; pp. 802-807.
45. Udoncy, E.; Wong, K. Supply chain performance evaluation: Trends and challenges. Am. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2009, 2, 202-211.
46. Kaplan, R.; Norton, D. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1992, 70, 71-79.
47. Kaplan, R.; Norton, D. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1996, 74, 75-85.
48. Saaty, T.L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1990, 48, 9-26.
49. De Felice, F. Editorial Research and applications of AHP/ANP and MCDA for decision making in manufacturing. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2012, 50, 4735-4737.
50. Bhagwat, R.; Sharma, M.K. Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2007, 53, 43-62.
51. Park, J.H.; Lee, J.K.; Yoo, J.S. A framework for designing the balanced supply chain scorecard. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2005, 14, 335-346.
52. Yang, J. A balanced performance measurement scorecard approach for Product Service Systems. In proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering, Beijing, China, 24-26 July 2009; pp.548-551.
53. Subic, A.; Shabani, B.; Hedayati, M.; Crossin, E. Performance Analysis of the Capability Assessment Tool for Sustainable Manufacturing. Sustainability 2013, 5, 3543-3561.