A step towards developing a sustainability performance measure within industrial networks

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 2201-2222

  Shokravi, Samaneh ^a,b   Kurnia, Sherah ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dyadic level; Industrial process; Performance measure; Supply chain; Sustainability; Triple bottom line

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUSTAINABILITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84899147793     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6042201     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Ashby, A.; Leat, M.; Hudson-Smith, M. Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2012, 17, 497-516.
2. Auramo, J.; Kauremaa, J.; Tanskanen, K. Benefits of IT in supply chain management: An explorative study of progressive companies. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2005, 35, 82-100.
3. Chae, B.; Yen, H.R.; Sheu, C. Information technology and supply chain collaboration: Moderating effects of existing relationships btween partners. Eng. Manag. IEEE Trans. 2005, 52, 440-448.
4. Damsgaard, J. The Diffusion of Electronic Data Interchange: An Institutional and Organizational Analysis of Alternative Diffusion Patterns. PhD Thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark, 1996.
5. Ageron, B.; Gunasekaran, A.; Spalanzani, A. Sustainable supply management: An empirical study. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 168-182.
6. Carter, C.R.; Easton, P.L. Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2011, 41, 46-62.
7. Chien, M.K.; Shih, L.H. An empirical study of the implementation of green supply chain management practices in the electrical and electronic industry and their relation to organizational performances. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 4, 383-394.
8. Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J.; Lai, K.H. Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008, 111, 261-273.
9. Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J.; Lai, K.H. Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2012, 50, 1377-1394.
10. Andersen, M.; Skjoett-Larsen, T. Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2009, 14, 75-86.
11. Capaldi, N. Corporate social responsibility and the bottom line. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2005, 32, 408-423.
12. Soylu, A.; Oruc, C.; Turkay, M.; Fujita, K.; Asakura, T. Synergy analysis of collaborative supply chain management in energy systems using multi-period MILP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 174, 387-403.
13. Styles, D.; Schoenberger, H.; Galvez-Martos, J.L. Environmental improvement of product supply chains: A review of European retailers' performance. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 65, 57-78.
14. Carter, C.R.; Rogers, D.S. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2008, 38, 360-387.
15. Simchi-Levi, E.; Kaminsky, P. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies and Case Studies; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
16. Seuring, S. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 54, 1513-1520.
17. Dekker, R.; Bloemhof, J.; Mallidis, I. Operations Research for green logistics-An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 219, 671-679.
18. Georgiadis, P.; Vlachos, D. The effect of environmental parameters on product recovery. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 157, 449-464.
19. Bai, C.; Sarkis, J.; Wei, X.; Koh, L. Evaluating ecological sustainable performance measures for supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2012, 17, 78-92.
20. Kainuma, Y.; Tawara, N. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. J. Prod. Econ. 2006, 101, 99-108.
21. Georgiadis, P.; Besiou, M. Environmental strategies for electrical and electronic equipment supply chains: which to choose? Sustainability 2009, 1, 722-733.
22. Shokravi, S.; Smith, A.J.R.; Burvill, C.R.; Maheswararajah, S. Industrial Environmental Performance Evaluation-Comparison and Sensitivity Analysis. In Managing Resources of a Limited Planet: Pathways and Visions under Uncertainty, Sixth Biennial Meeting, Proceedings of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs) 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Leipzig, Germany, 1-5 July 2012; Seppelt, R., Voinov, A.A., Lange, S., Bankamp, D., Eds.; pp. 1037-1044.
23. Bernardes, E. The effect of supply Management on aspects of social capital and the impact on performance: A social network Perspective. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2010, 46, 45-56.
24. Hahn, T.; Figge, F.; Pinkse, J.; Preuss, L. Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: You can't have your cake and eat it. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2010, 19, 217-229.
25. Hutchins, M.; Sutherland, J.W. An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1688-1698.
26. Defee, C.; Esper, T.; Mollenkopf, D. Leveraging closed-loop orientation and leadership for environmental sustainability. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2009, 14, 87-98.
27. AS/NZS ISO 14040. Environmental Management-Life cycle assessment-Principles and framework. Available online: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/iso:std:iso:14040:ed-2:v1:en (accessed on 9 April 2014).
28. Finnveden, G.; Hauschild, M.; Ekvall, T.; Guinee, J.; Heijungs, R.; Hellweg, S.; Koehler, A.; Pennington, D.; Suh, S. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 91, 1-21.
29. Pishvaee, M.; Razmi, J. Environmental supply chain network design using multi-objective fuzzy mathematical programming. Appl. Math. Model. 2012, 36, 3433-3446.
30. Shokravi, S. Reviewing environmental impact assessment methods for industrial processes. Traffic Interdiscip. Grad. J. 2013, 13, 175-199.
31. Pineda-Henson, R.; Culaba, A. A diagnostic model for green productivity assessment of manufacturing processes. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2004, 9, 379-386.
32. Bi, Z.; Wang, L. Manufacturing Paradigm Shift Towards Better Sustainability. In Cloud Manufacturing; Springer: London, UK, 2013; pp. 99-119.
33. Sallak, M.; Schon, W.; Aguirre, F. Extended component importance measures considering aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 2013, 62, 49-65.
34. Bai, C.; Sarkis, J. Green supplier development: Analytical evaluation using rough set theory. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 1200-1210.
35. Delai, I.; Takahashi, S. Sustainability measurement system: A reference model proposal. Soc. Responsib. J. 2011, 7, 438-471.
36. Seuring, S.; Muller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1699-1710.
37. Hassini, E.; Surti, C.; Searcy, C. A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 69-82.
38. Rusinko, C.A. Green manufacturing: an evaluation of environmentally sustainabile manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2007, 54, 445-454.
39. Cox, A. Power, value and supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 1999, 4, 167-175.
40. Gunasekaran, A.; Kobu, B. Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: A review of recent literature (1995-2004) for research and applications. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 2819-2840.
41. Olugu, E.; Wong, K.; Shaharoun, A. A comprehensive approach in assessing the performance of an automobile closed-loop supply chain. Sustainability 2010, 2, 871-889.
42. Akyuz, G.A.; Erkan, T. Supply chain peraformance measurement: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2010, 48, 5137-5155.
43. Subic, A.; Shabani, B.; Hedayati, M.; Crossin, E. Performance analysis of the capability assessment tool for sustainable manufacturing. Sustainability 2013, 5, 3543-3561.
44. Miemczyk, J.; Johnsen, T.E.; Macquet, M. Sustainable purchasing and supply management: A structured literature review of definitions and measures at the dyad, chain and network levels. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2012, 17, 478-496.
45. Cachon, G.P.; Lariviere, M.A. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing constracts: Strenght and limitations. Manag. Sci. 2005, 51, 30-44.
46. United Nations. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies; Number 3; The Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
47. Ukidwe, N.; Bakshi, B. Flow of natural versus economic capital in industrial supply networks and its implications to sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 9759-9769.
48. Cachon, G.P. Coordination with Contracts. Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operation; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 229-339.
49. Lockamy, A. Examining supply chain networks using V-A-T material flow analysis. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2008, 13, 343-348.
50. Lummus, R.R.; Krumwiede, D.W.; Vokurka, R.J. The relationship of logistics to supply chain management: Developing a common industry definition. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2001, 101, 426-432.
51. Van Hoek, R.I. "Measuring the unmeasurable"-Measuring and improving performance in the supply chain. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 1998, 3, 187-192.
52. Biegler, L.; Grossmann, I.; Westerberg, A. Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design; Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1997.
53. Perry, R. Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook; McGrow-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2008.
54. Palaniappan, C. Selection of inherently safer process routes: A case study. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2004, 43, 641-647.
55. Jia, X.P.; Han, F.; Tan, X. Integrated environmental performance assessment of chemical process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 29, 5.
56. Shokravi, S. An Environmental and Economic Performance Measure for Industrial Supply Networks. In Proceedings of the 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013) Adapting to Change: The Multiple Roles of Modelling, Adelaide Convention Centre, SA, Australia, 1-6 December 2013.
57. Voinov, A.; Seppelt, R.; Reis, S.; Nabel, J.E.; Shokravi, S. Values in socio-environmental modelling: Persuasion for action or excuse for inaction. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 53, 207-212.
58. Rinderknecht, S.L.; Borsuk, M.E.; Reichert, P. Bridging uncertain and ambiguous knowledge with imprecise probabilities. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 36, 122-130.
59. Kletz, T.A. Accident reports may not tell us everything we need to know. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2009, 22, 753-756.
60. Refsgaard, J.C.; van der Sluijs, J.P.; Hojberg, A.L.; Vanrolleghem, P.A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process-A framework and guidance. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22, 1543-1556.
61. Crowl, D.; Louvar, J.F. Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals With Applications; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2001.
62. Hatakeyama, S.; Akimoto, H.; Washida, N. Effect of temperature on the formation of photochemical ozone in a propene NOx air irradiation system. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1991, 25, 1884-1890.
63. Wesely, M.L. Parameterisation of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmos. Environ. 1989, 23, 1293-1304.
64. Gunasekera, M.; Edwards, D. Estimating the environmental impact of catastrophic chemical releases to the atmosphere an index method for ranking alternative chemical process routes. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 2003, 81, 463-474.
65. Verschueren, K. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals; Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1996.
66. UNDSD. Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. The United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
67. Borgonovo, E. Epistemic uncertainty in the ranking and categorization of probabilistic safety assessment model elements: Issuesand findings. Risk Anal. 2008, 28, 983-1001.
68. Whitmer, C.; Olson, W.; Sutherland, J. Determination of design effort distribution for an environmentally conscious product using a pairwise comparison approach. ASME IMECE-Manuf. Sci. Eng. 1995, MED 2-2, 847-853.
69. Schmidt, I.; Meurer, M.; Saling, P.; Kicherer, A.; Reuter, W.; Gensch, C. SEEbalance: Managing sustainability of products and processes with the socio-eco-efficiency analysis by BASF. Greener Manag. Int. 2004, 45, 79-94.
70. Tatari, O.; Kurmapu, D. Sustainability assessment of highways: A Malmquist index of US states. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST), Chicago, IL, USA, 16-18 May 2011.
71. Weiss, M.; Gmelin, T.; Sun, X.; Dzikus, N. Enhanced Assessment of the Air Transportation System. In Proceedings of the 11th AIAA-ATIO Conference, 20-22 September 2011, German Aerospace Center: Virginia Beach, VA, USA, 2011; Volume 11, p. 13.
72. Shadiya, O.; High, K. Sustainability evaluator: Tool for evaluating process sustainability. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2013, 32, 749-761.
73. Burchart-Korol, D. Application of life cycle sustainability assessment and scocio-eco-efficiency analysis in comprehensive evaluation of sustainable development. J. Ecol. Health 2011, 15, 107-110.
74. Uhlman, B.; Saling, P. Measuring and communicating sustainability through eco-efficiency analysis. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. (AIChE) 2010, 106, 17-26.
75. Li, G.; Yan, H.; Wang, S.; Xia, Y. Comparative analysis on value of information sharing in supply chains. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2005, 10, 34-46.
76. Seuring, S. Assessing the rigor of case study research in supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2008, 13, 128-137.
77. Deng, H. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparison. In Proceedings of the Fuzzy Systems Conference-FUZZ-IEEE'99, IEEE Internation, Seoul, Korea, 22-25 August 1999; Volume 2.