Implementing the balanced scorecard using the analytic hierarchy process & the analytic network process

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 57, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 682-691

  Leung, L C ^a   Lam, K C ^a   Cao, D ^b  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

Author keywords

AHP; ANP; Balanced scorecard; Performance measurement

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; PERFORMANCE; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS (ANP); BALANCED SCORECARD; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT;

FINANCE;

EID: 33745791567     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602040     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Baiman S and Rajan MV (1995). The informational disadvantages of discretionary bonus schemes. Acc Rev 70: 557-579.
2. Banker R and Datar S (1989). Sensitivity, precision and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation. J Acc Res 27: 21-39.
3. Belton V and Gear T (1983). On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies. OMEGA 11: 228-230.
4. Brancato CK (1995). New performance measures - a research report. Report Number 1118-95-RR, Conference Board, New York, NY.
5. Chan YL and Lynn BE (1991). Performance evaluation and AHP. J Mngt Acc Res 3: 57-87.
6. Dyson RG (2000). Strategy, performance and operational research. J Opl Res Soc 51: 5-11.
7. Eccles RG and Pyburn PJ (1992). Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance. Mngt Acc 74: 41-44.
8. Harker PT and Vargas LG (1990). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process - Reply. Mngt Sci 36(3): 269-273.
9. Ittner C and Larcker DF (1998). Innovations in performance measurement: trends and research implications. J Mngt Acc Res 10: 205-238.
10. Kaplan RS and Atkinson AA (1998). Advanced Management Accounting, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall: NJ.
11. Kaplan RS and Norton DP (1992). The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev 70: 71-79.
12. Kaplan RS and Norton DP (1996). The Balanced Scorecard. Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA.
13. Lawson R, Stratton W and Hatch T (2003). Winning ways: implementation strategies balanced scorecard success. CMA Mngt 77: 26-28.
14. Leung LC and Cao D (2001). On the efficacy of modeling multi-attribute decision problems using AHP and Sinarchy. Eur J Opl Res 132: 39-49.
15. Leung LC, Hui YV and Zheng M (2003). Analysis of compatibility between interdependent matrices in ANP. J Opl Res Soc 54: 758-768.
16. Liberatore MJ and Miller T (1998). A framework for integrating activity-based costing and the balanced scorecard into the logistics strategy development and monitoring process. J Bus Logistics 19: 131-154.
17. Maskell BH (1992). Performance measurement for world class manufacturing. Corporate Controller 4: 44-49.
18. Rangone A (1996). An analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departments. Int J Ops Prod Mngt 16: 104-119.
19. Saaty TL (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
20. Saaty TL (1996). The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications: Pittsburgh.
21. Simons R (1999). Performance Measurement & Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. Prentice Hall: NJ.
22. Smith PC and Goddard M (2002). Performance management and operational research: a marriage made in heaven? J Opl Res Soc 53: 247-255.
23. Suwignjo P, Bititci US and Carrie AS (2000). Quantitative models for performance measurement system. Int J Prod Econ 64: 231-241.